ISSN 2581-8503 Double-Blind Peer Review Open Access Monthly Journal Publication Cycle November 2026
Peer-Reviewed · Open Access · Monthly Nov 2026
Research Discovery

Search Publications

Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.

Clear Search

Search Results

4,146 publications
LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL: JUDICIAL TRENDS IN INDIA
Open Access

LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL: JUDICIAL TRENDS IN INDIA

Authors: VIPIN KUMAR & DR. RAJU KUMAR BHAGAT
Registration ID: 107117 | Published Paper ID: WBL7117 & WBL7118
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India 
Page No.: 1016-1029
Vol. Volume 4 Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 September 2026 Pages 1016 – 1029
[1] Research Scholar, Department of Law, Netaji Subhas University, jmshedpur, Jharkhand.[2] Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Netaji Subhas University, jmshedpur, Jharkhand[3] Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 (HL).[4] Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 (HL).[5] Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 (HL)[6] Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] Ch 935; Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832.[7] Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 (HL).[8] Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013][9] The Companies Act of 2013[10] The Income Tax Act, 1961[11] Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961[12] The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002[13] Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999[14] State of UP v. Renusagar Power Co. (1988) 4 SCC 59 (India).[15] LIC of India v. Escorts Ltd. (1986) 1 SCC 264 (India).[16] Delhi Dev. Auth. v. Skipper Constr. Co., (1996) 4 SCC 622 (India)[17] Gilford Motor Co. Ltd. v. Horne [1933] Ch 935 (CA) (Eng.).[18] Balwant Rai Saluja v. Air India Ltd., (2014) 9 SCC 407 (India)[19] Vodafone Int'l Holdings B.V. v. Union of India, (2012) 6 SCC 613 (India).
STRENGTHENIG PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN INDIA THROUGH MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND CAPACITY BUILDING: A PUBLIC POLICY PERSPECTIVE
Open Access

STRENGTHENIG PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN INDIA THROUGH MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND CAPACITY BUILDING: A PUBLIC POLICY PERSPECTIVE

Authors: UBAD HASSAN & VISHNU PRASAD
Registration ID: 107115 | Published Paper ID: WBL7115 & WBL7116
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India 
Page No.: 997-1015
Vol. Volume 4 Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 September 2026 Pages 997 – 1015
[1]ALFONSO B. VASQEZ III MPA I, Capacity Building in Public Administration, available at: https://www.scribd.com/presentation/841193410/MPA-605-PRINCIPLES-IN-PUBLIC-ADMIN-CAPACITY-BUILDING (last visited on Sep 15, 2026).[2] Stuart S. Nagel, “Political Science and Public Administration as Key Elements in Policy Analysis,” In Improving Policy Analysis, 28-34 (SAGE Publications, 1980).[3] IV Al-Atti, “Public administration:  essence and definition” 6(8), Interregional Academy of Personnel Management 35–41 (2018).[4] O. Ziboreva, “Concepts and signs of public administration” 64 Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law, 220–223 (2021).[5] Id. at 5.[6] J. Vrba, “Path to Vietnam’s welfare system sustainability” 8(1) International Journal of Public Administration Management and Economic Development 130–137 (2023).[7] Q. Huynh, “Street vendors in Vietnam:  Short cultural and economic insight” 1(2) International Journal of Culture and Education 13–17 (2023).[8] S. Panja, “Challenges and opportunities for public sector administration in India” 1(3) Journal of Management and Administration Provision 60–64 (2021).[9] R. Kumar, “Crisis of introduction of public administration as a discipline in Indian colleges and universities: A Study of Himachal Pradesh” 5(5) International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (2023).[10] S. Kühl, “Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations” 40(3) Development and Change 551-577 (2009).[11] Katherine Bersch, Sergio Praca, et.al. (eds.), State Capacity and Bureaucratic Autonomy Within National States: Mapping the Archipelago of Excellence (Cambridge University Press, Brazil, 2013).[12]Ministry of Commerce and Industry, “Ease of Doing Business: Strengthening India’s Business Framework,” Press Information Bureau, June 7, 2026, available at: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseDetail.aspx?PRID=2269961&reg=1&lang=1 (last visited on Sep 15, 2026).[13]Supra note 1 at 2.[14]Ministry of Commerce and Industry, “Sadhana Saptah 2026 Strengthening Capacity Building for Citizen Centric Governance,” Press Information Bureau, April 04, 2026, available at: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2248940&reg=3&lang=2 (last visited on Sep, 14, 2026).[15]Id. at 5.[16]Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, “Empowering India's Skill Ecosystem Government's Initiatives from Classroom to Enterprise,” Press Information Bureau, July 15, 2026, available at: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2284941&reg=48&lang=2 (last visited Sep 12, 2026).[17]Capacity Building Commission, “Global Digital Capacity Building Alliance,” available at: https://cbc.gov.in/global-digital-capacity-building-alliance (last visited Sep 15, 2026).[18]Supra note 2 at 4.[19]Indian School of Public Policy, “Strengthening Public Policy and Governance Through Government Ministries,” available at: https://www.ispp.org.in/strengthening-public-policy-and-governance-through-government-ministries/ (last visited Sep 15, 2026).[20]Id at 9.[21]PolSci. Institute, “Understanding Public Policy: Definitions and Key Concepts,” Aug 8, 2025, available at: https://polsci.institute/public-policy-administration-india/understanding-public-policy-key-concepts/.[22]Id at 11.[23]Supra note 12 at 8.
IMPACT OF MEDIA IN BLASPHEMY: FROM THE PRINT PUBLIC SPHERE TO THE PLATFORM ECONOMY IN INDIA
Open Access

IMPACT OF MEDIA IN BLASPHEMY: FROM THE PRINT PUBLIC SPHERE TO THE PLATFORM ECONOMY IN INDIA

Authors: ANJU R V
Registration ID: 107114 | Published Paper ID: WBL7114
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India 
Page No.: 987-996
Vol. Volume 4 Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 September 2026 Pages 987 – 996
[1] Raj Pal v. King-Emperor AIR 1927 Lah. 590[2] Sharma, A., & Waseem. (2024). BLASPHEMY LEGISLATION IN INDIA: SPOTLIGHT ON PUNJAB’S NEW LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies., 9(2).[3] Nash, D. B. (2020). Blasphemy through British (post) colonial eyes. The Indian Criminal Code (pp. 66–82)[4] Nupur Sharma v. Union of India 2022 SCC 1553[5] Sharma, A., & Waseem. (2024). BLASPHEMY LEGISLATION IN INDIA: SPOTLIGHT ON PUNJAB’S NEW LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies., 9(2).[6] Aditya Singh Deshwal v. Union of India & Ors. W.P.(CRL) No. 43/2022[7] Shreya Singhal v. Union of India is (2015) 5 SCC 1[8] ibid[9] 2025 INSC 410[10] Thakkar, R. (2025). Legal Responses to Online Hate Speech in India: Evaluating Section 66A and the Supreme Court’s Judgment in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. Studies in Law and Justice, 4(3), 26–30[11] Sundar, S. S., Molina, M. D., & Cho, E. (2021). Seeing Is Believing: Is Video Modality More Powerful in Spreading Fake News via Online Messaging Apps? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(6), 301–319
Rethinking Deterrence in Indian Rape Laws: Beyond Harsher Punishments.
Open Access

Rethinking Deterrence in Indian Rape Laws: Beyond Harsher Punishments.

Authors: MS. GAYATRI HEDAOO & DR. RUTUJA PUROHIT
Registration ID: 107112 | Published Paper ID: WBL7112 & WBL7113
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India 
Page No.: 971-986
Vol. Volume 4 Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 September 2026 Pages 971 – 986
[1] Dr. Rutuja Purohit, Assistant Professor of Law at Shankarrao Chavan Law College and Ms. Gayatri Hedaoo, Student of Shankarrao Chavan Law College.[2] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2022 (2023); National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2023 (2024); National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2024 (2025)[3] Shaunak Sharma & Apporva Singh, Shifting Paradigm: An Analysis of Evolution of Rape Laws in India, 6(3) Int’l       J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 3690, 3693 (2023).[4] s Kumar & Tanaya Kamlakar, Deconstructing Anomalies: Rethinking Rape Laws Through Lens of Evolving Jurisprudence on Gender and Sexuality in India, ILI L. Rev. (Summer 2024)[5] Id.[6] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, § 63 (India).[7] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 2023, § 63 (India)[8] Dube, supra note, at 18-22[9] Dipa Dube, Rape Laws in India (LexisNexis Butterworths 2008).[10] Tejashwini Mallick, An Extensive Study of Rape Laws in India, Manupatra (2021).[11] Soyonika Gogoi, Consent Matters: A Comparative Study of Rape Laws in India, UK and Canada, 5 (1) IJLMH Page 1395 - 1405 (2022), DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.112670.[12] Basu Roy, S., & Ghosh Dastidar, S. (2018). Why do men rape? Understanding the determinants of rapes in India. Third World Quarterly, 39(8), 1435–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1460200[13] Gopi Shanker v. State of Rajasthan, 1966 S.C.R. 152 (Raj. H.C.)[14] Tukaram & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra, (1979) 2 S.C.C. 143[15] Mallick, supra note.[16] Sharma & Singh, supra note 12, at 3697.[17] Mukesh & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2017) 6 SCC 1 (India).[18] Dube, supra note 1[19] Swati Kaushal & Harish Kumar Tiwari, Exploring the Relevance of Deterrence Punishment and Its Implications to Social Stability and Legal Sanction, 11 Russian L.J. 2023.[20] Ayush Tazi, Rape, Capital Punishment and Deterrence: An Analysis of India’s Penal Approach, 5 Burnished L.J. 1 (2024)[21] Swati Kaushal & Harish Kumar Tiwari, Exploring the Relevance of Deterrence Punishment and Its Implications to Social Stability and Legal Sanction[22] Prabal Kumar Sinha, Rape: An Assertion of Male Power, Authority and Dominant Over the Opposite Sex, IJRAR, June 2017, at 205–10[23] Ayush Tazi, Rape, Capital Punishment and Deterrence: An Analysis of India’s Penal Approach, 5 Burnished L.J. 1 (2024)[24] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2022 (2023); National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2023 (2024); National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2024 (2025).[25] Ayush Tazi, Rape, Capital Punishment and Deterrence: An Analysis of India’s Penal Approach, 5 Burnished L.J. 1 (2024)[26] Sudip Bhattacharya & Amarjeet Singh, Guardians of Consent: Enhancing Rape Prevention Through Social Control Mechanisms, 13 Dec. 2024, 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1487451, Frontiers in Sociology.[27] Chinmay Gaikwad, Four-Year-Old Girl Raped and Killed in Pune Village; Accused Held, The Hindu (May 2, 2026). Source: The Hindu https://share.google/iNynrDMe3ZNYd8KPT[28] Alim Shaikh, Pune Rape-Murder Case: Accused Acquitted Twice in Past for Similar Assaults, The Times of India (May 4, 2026). Pune rape-murder case: Accused acquitted twice in past for similar assaults | Pune News - The Times of India https://share.google/Os7h6LuuDViBjVdTt[29] Daniyal Zameer, Mohd Saifullah Khan & Zubair, A Critical Analysis of Indian Anti-Rape Laws in Brief Nexus to the Global Perspective, 4 Indian J. Legal Rev. 304, 306 (2024).[30] Id[31] Gogoi, supra note (2022), DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.112670[32] Zameer et al., supra note 1, at 306[33] Gogoi, supra note, at 1395.[34] Daniyal Zameer, Mohd Saifullah Khan & Zubair, A Critical Analysis of Indian Anti-Rape Laws in Brief Nexus to the Global Perspective, 4 Indian J. Legal Rev. 304, 306 (2024).[35] Stefano Bergman & Sophia Thunberg, Rethinking Rape Laws Emphasizes the Central Role of Consent in Shaping Both Legl Frameworks and Public Understanding, 7 Int’l J. L. & Pub. Policy 55 (2025). https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0702.822[36] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India (2010–2020), tbls.13A.1 & 6A.1, Ministry of Home Affairs, Gov’t of India, https://ncrb.gov.in[37] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India (annual reports for 2013–2023), Government of India, available at https://ncrb.gov.in.[38] Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1982 SC 1325(India).[39] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India (2010), tbl.13A.2 & Crime in India (2023), tbl.6A.2, Ministry of Home Affairs, Gov’t of India, https://ncrb.gov.in.[40] Daniyal Zameer, Mohd Saifullah Khan & Zubair, A Critical Analysis of Indian Anti-Rape Laws in Brief Nexus to the Global Perspective, 4 Indian J. Legal Rev. 304, 306 (2024).[41] Ayush Tazi, Rape, Capital Punishment and Deterrence: An Analysis of India’s Penal Approach, 5 Burnished L.J. 1 (2024)
THE SENTINEL ON THE WATCHTOWER: JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA BETWEEN ACTIVISM AND RESTRAINT
Open Access

THE SENTINEL ON THE WATCHTOWER: JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA BETWEEN ACTIVISM AND RESTRAINT

Authors: NAYELA RAIES & MOHD SHAGIL ANSARI Registration ID: 107110 | Published Paper ID: WBL7110 Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India Page No.: 952-970
Vol. Volume 4 Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 September 2026 Pages 952 – 970
[1] Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) 3 SCC 625.[2] AIR 1967 SC 1643.[3] AIR 1973 SC 1461.[4] (1978) 1 SCC 248.[5] James Bryce, I Modern Democracies 272 (The Macmillan Company, New York, 1921).[6] AIR 1973 SC 1461.[7] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.[8] M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law 177 (LexisNexis, New Delhi, 8th edn., 2018).[9] Information Technology Act 2000, India, available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org (last visited on May 11, 2026).[10] D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India 118 (LexisNexis, New Delhi, 23rd edn., 2015).[11] Dr. J.N. Pandey, Constitutional Law of India 74 (Central Law Agency, Allahabad, 58th edn., 2021).[12] Ibid.[13] Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) 3 SCC 625.[14] Jahnavi Sindhu, “A Responsive Theory of Judicial Review-A View from India” 34 National Law School of India Review 72 (2023).[15] Supra note 8 at 177.[16] 5 U.S. 137 (1803).[17] Dr. Sanjay Ambekar, “The Doctrine of Judicial Review: A Critical Examination” 9 IRE Journals 414 (2025).[18] Supra note 17 at 414.[19] Id. at 415.[20] AIR 1950 SC 27.[21] AIR 1951 SC 226.[22] AIR 1967 SC 1643.[23] AIR 1973 SC 1461.[24] Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) 3 SCC 625.[25] (1978) 1 SCC 248.[26] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.[27] H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India 133 (Universal Law Publishing, Nagpur, 4th edn., 2015).[28] The Constitution of India, art. 13(1).[29] Information Technology Act 2000, India, available at: scribd.com (last visited on May 11, 2026).[30] The Constitution of India, art. 32(2).[31] Justice Dr. B S Chauhan, “Judicial Review” available at: https://nja.gov.in (last visited on May 11, 2026).[32] The Constitution of India, art. 226(1).[33] K. Shiv Sidharth, “Judicial Governance in India and its implications for Social Justice, Change and Development” 3 CLR 87 (2022).[34] M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law 180 (LexisNexis, New Delhi, 8th edn., 2018).[35] Dr. Banamali Barik, “Judicial Review in India: An analysis of the Constitutionality of Laws” available at: voiceoflaw.in (last visited on May 11, 2026).[36] AIR 1950 SC 27.[37] Bhikaji Narayan v. State of M.P., AIR 1955 SC 781.[38] Muthiah M. Ct. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1955 SC 146.[39]Shubhangi Upmanya and Gautam Badlani, “Article 13 of the Indian Constitution” available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in (last visited on May 12, 2026).[40] K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1953 SC 375.[41] State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara, AIR 1951 SC 318.[42] AIR 1973 SC 1461.[43] (1978) 1 SCC 248.[44] (1997) 6 SCC 241.[45] (1994) 2 SCR 644.[46] AIR 2018 SC 4321.[47] Dr. Sanjay Ambekar, “The Doctrine of Judicial Review: A Critical Examination” 9 IRE Journals 416 (2025).[48] AIR 1976 SC 1207.[49] (1978) 1 SCC 248.[50] Rajeev Suri v. Delhi Development Authority (2021) SCC Online SC 7.[51] AIR 2020 SC 1308.[52] Supra note 47 at 416.[53] Ibid.[54] Id. at 417.[55] M. Asad Malik, “Changing Dimensions of Federalism in India: An Appraisal” 2 ILI Law Review 89 (2019).[56] D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India 122 (LexisNexis, New Delhi, 23rd edn., 2015).[57] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461.[58] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248.[59] Information Technology Act 2000, India, available at: https://www.acton.org (last visited on May 12, 2026). 
ARREST UNDER THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023: BALANCING POLICE POWERS, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY AND CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS
Open Access

ARREST UNDER THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023: BALANCING POLICE POWERS, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY AND CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS

Authors: KAMAKSHI GANESHKUMAR
Registration ID: 107109 | Published Paper ID: WBL7109
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India 
Page No.: 913-951
Vol. Volume 4 Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 September 2026 Pages 913 – 951
[1]Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023 [hereinafter BNSS], § 35 (India); Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 (India).[2] Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1994) 4 SCC 260 (India); Arnesh Kumar, (2014) 8 SCC 273.[3] BNSS, commencement notification (bringing the Sanhita into force on July 1, 2024).[4] BNSS, § 35(1)(b).[5] Id. § 35(1)(b)(i)–(v).[6] Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51 (India).[7] BNSS, § 35(3).[8] Id. § 35(4)–(6).[9] Joginder Kumar, (1994) 4 SCC 260.[10]D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, (1997) 1 SCC 416 (India).[11] Arnesh Kumar, (2014) 8 SCC 273.[12] Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2022) 1 SCC 676 (India).[13] Satender Kumar Antil, (2022) 10 SCC 51.[14] Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, (2024) 7 SCC 576 (India).[15] Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2024) 7 SCC 576 (India).[16] Constitution of India 1950, art 14; E P Royappa v State of Tamil Nadu (1974) 4 SCC 3 (India).[17] Constitution of India 1950, art 21.[18] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248 (India).[19] Constitution of India 1950, art 22(1)–(2).[20] D.K. Basu, (1997) 1 SCC 416.[21] BNSS, §§ 47–49, 53, 56.[22] Code of Criminal Procedure, No. 2 of 1974, §§ 41, 41A (India); BNSS, § 35.