ISSN 2581-8503 Double-Blind Peer Review Open Access Monthly Journal Publication Cycle November 2026
Peer-Reviewed · Open Access · Monthly Nov 2026
Research Discovery

Search Publications

Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.

Clear Search

Search Results

4,146 publications
GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE: A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IN INDIA
Open Access

GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE: A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IN INDIA

Authors: DR. PRADEEP KACHCHAWA
Registration ID: 107078 | Published Paper ID: WBL7078
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 541-554
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, MGSU, Bikaner[2] INDIA CONST. pmbl.[3] INDIA CONST. art. 14, 15(1), 15(3), 16, 39(a), 39(d), 42.[4] Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, Dec. 18, 1979, 1249 U.N.T.S. 13.[5] Equal Remuneration Act, No. 25 of 1976 (India); Code on Wages, No. 29 of 2019 (India).[6] Maternity Benefit Act, No. 53 of 1961 (India).[7] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, No. 14 of 2013 (India). Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, No. 40 of 2019 (India).[8] C.B. Muthamma v. Union of India, (1979) 4 S.C.C. 260 (India).[9] Air India v. Nargesh Meerza, (1981) 4 S.C.C. 335 (India).[10] Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Ltd. v. Audrey D’Costa, (1987) 2 S.C.C. 469 (India).[11] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India).[12] Charu Khurana v. Union of India, (2015) 1 S.C.C. 192 (India).[13] Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa, (2023) 2 S.C.C. 1 (India).[14] World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2023.[15] ILO Convention No. 111, Discrimination (Employment and Occupation), June 25, 1958.[16] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, No. 14 of 2013 (India).[17] E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 4 S.C.C. 3 (India).[18] State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan, A.I.R. 1951 S.C. 226 (India).[19] Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, (1992) Supp. (3) S.C.C. 217 (India).[20] C.B. Muthamma v. Union of India, (1979) 4 S.C.C. 260 (India).[21] Air India v. Nargesh Meerza, (1981) 4 S.C.C. 335 (India).[22] Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, Dec. 18, 1979, 1249 U.N.T.S. 13.[23] Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, India’s Ratification of CEDAW (1993).[24] CEDAW art. 11.[25] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India).[26] Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra, (1999) 1 S.C.C. 759 (India).[27] International Labour Organization, Equal Remuneration Convention, No. 100, June 29, 1951.[28] International Labour Organization, Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, No. 111, June 25, 1958.[29] World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2023.[30] Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e.[31] Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Title VII Enforcement Guidelines.[32] Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986).[33] Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020).[34] Equality Act 2010, c. 15 (U.K.).[35] Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, July 5, 2006.[36] Directive (EU) 2024/1500, Strengthening Equality Bodies, Apr. 2024.
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-86349287/GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE: A LEGAL PE
OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OF AN UNBORN CHILD IN PROPERTY: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF LEGALITY WITH REFERENCE TO SECTION 13 OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
Open Access

OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OF AN UNBORN CHILD IN PROPERTY: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF LEGALITY WITH REFERENCE TO SECTION 13 OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882

Authors: DR. KAPTAN CHAND
Registration ID: 107077 | Published Paper ID: WBL7077
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 527-540
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Associate Professor of Law, Tantia University, Sri Ganganagar.[2]  Digest of Justinian, Book I, Title V.[3] Transfer of Property Act, No. 4 of 1882, § 13 (India).[4] M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law 112 (8th ed. 2018).[5] Kusum v. State of Maharashtra, (2000) 6 SCC 129.[6] B.B. Mitra, The Transfer of Property Act 221 (12th ed. 2015).[7]  Tagore v. Tagore, (1872) 9 Beng LR 377 (PC).[8] J.H. Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History 312 (5th ed. 2019).[9] Code Civil [C. civ.] art. 725 (Fr.); Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [BGB] § 1923 (Ger.).[10] Restatement (Third) of Property: Wills and Other Donative Transfers § 25 (Am. Law Inst. 2003).[11] P. Ishwara Bhat, Property Law in India 145 (2016).[12] Avtar Singh, Law of Property 98 (2017).[13] R.K. Sinha, Transfer of Property Act 134 (2019).[14] Transfer of Property Act, No. 4 of 1882, § 13 (India).[15] M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law 112 (8th ed. 2018).[16] J.H. Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History 312 (5th ed. 2019).[17] Digest of Justinian, Book I, Title V.[18] Avtar Singh, Law of Property 98 (2017).[19] Tagore v. Tagore, (1872) 9 Beng LR 377 (PC).[20] Raja Bajrang Bahadur Singh v. Thakurain Bakhtraj Kuer, AIR 1953 SC 7.[21] B.B. Mitra, The Transfer of Property Act 221 (12th ed. 2015).[22] P. Ishwara Bhat, Property Law in India 145 (2016).[23] S. Krishnan, “Unborn Rights and Reproductive Technologies,” 42 Indian Bar Review 67 (2021).[24] Transfer of Property Act, No. 4 of 1882, § 13 (India).[25] Id. § 5.[26] Avtar Singh, Law of Property 98 (2017).[27] R.K. Sinha, Transfer of Property Act 134 (2019).[28] Raja Bajrang Bahadur Singh v. Thakurain Bakhtraj Kuer, AIR 1953 SC 7.[29] Gourishankar v. Shantibai, AIR 1959 MP 240.[30] B.B. Mitra, The Transfer of Property Act 221 (12th ed. 2015).[31] P. Ishwara Bhat, Property Law in India 145 (2016).[32] Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [BGB] § 1923 (Ger.).[33] Tagore v. Tagore, (1872) 9 Beng LR 377 (PC).[34] S. Krishnan, “Unborn Rights and Reproductive Technologies,” 42 Indian Bar Review 67, 72 (2021).
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-69873974/OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OF AN UNBORN CHILD IN PROPERTY: A
“FROM PUNISHMENT TO REHABILITATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF REFORMATIVE PENOLOGY UNDER THE NEW CRIMINAL LAWS IN INDIA”
Open Access

“FROM PUNISHMENT TO REHABILITATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF REFORMATIVE PENOLOGY UNDER THE NEW CRIMINAL LAWS IN INDIA”

Authors: DAYA PRAJAPATI
Registration ID: 107076 | Published Paper ID: WBL7076
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 507-526
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner[2] Probation of Offenders Act, No. 20 of 1958, India Code (1958).[3] Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1977 SC 1926, (1977) 3 SCC 287.[4] Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1978 SC 1675, (1978) 4 SCC 494; see also Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (II), AIR 1980 SC 1579, (1980) 3 SCC 488.[5] State of Gujarat v. High Court of Gujarat, (1998) 7 SCC 392.[6] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[7] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[8] G.A. Res. 70/175, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules) (Dec. 17, 2015).[9] National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics India 2023 (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2025).[10] Indian Penal Code, No. 45 of 1860, India Code (1860).[11] Code of Criminal Procedure, No. 5 of 1898, India Code (1898).[12] Indian Evidence Act, No. 1 of 1872, India Code (1872).[13] Abhyuday Ram Tripathi & Dr. Sheeba Khalid, Evolution of the Criminal Justice System in India: Colonial Legacy and Reforms, Indian J. Legal Rev., Vol. 6, Issue 2, 727–738 (2026).[14] Police Act, No. 5 of 1861, India Code (1861).[15] Mahek Thacker, Reforms in the Indian Criminal Justice System: Colonial Legacies, New Legislation, and Ongoing Challenges, Indian J. Res. L. & Mgmt., Vol. III, Issue 9 (2026).[16] Probation of Offenders Act, No. 20 of 1958, India Code (1958).[17] Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab, AIR 1965 SC 444.[18] Juvenile Justice Act, No. 53 of 1986, India Code (1986).[19] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, No. 56 of 2000, India Code (2000).[20] Convention on the Rights of the Child, Nov. 20, 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3 (India ratified Dec. 11, 1992).[21] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, No. 2 of 2016, India Code (2016).[22] Salil Bali v. Union of India, (2013) 7 SCC 705.[23] Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Report of the All India Committee on Jail Reforms (Mulla Committee Report) (1980–83).[24] Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1978 SC 1675; see also Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (II), AIR 1980 SC 1579.[25] National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics India 2023 (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2025).[26] G.A. Res. 70/175, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules) (Dec. 17, 2015).[27] Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments (1764).[28] Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789).[29] Indian Penal Code, No. 45 of 1860, India Code (1860).[30] Roger Hopkins Burke, An Introduction to Criminological Theory (5th ed. 2018).[31] Probation of Offenders Act, No. 20 of 1958, India Code (1958).[32] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, No. 56 of 2000, India Code (2000); Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, No. 2 of 2016, India Code (2016).[33] Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab, AIR 1965 SC 444.[34] Salil Bali v. Union of India, (2013) 7 SCC 705.[35] Swati Saurabh, Reformative Theory of Punishment in the Modern Era: A Myth or Reality?, The LaWWay with Lawyers J., Vol. 30, Issue 30 (Dec. 11, 2025).[36] Vaibhav Singh Kirsali & Vatsal Chaudhary, Criminological Evaluation of Reformative Justice and Its Role in Preventing Repeat Offences, Indian J. Legal Rev., Vol. 6, Issue 1 (2026).[37] Mohd. Giasuddin v. State of A.P., AIR 1977 SC 1926.[38] Probation of Offenders Act, No. 20 of 1958, India Code (1958).[39] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, No. 56 of 2000, India Code (2000).[40] Preeti Bhagat, From Punishment to Rehabilitation: A Human Rights Analysis of the Reformative System, Legal Service India (Mar. 24, 2026).[41] G.A. Res. 70/175, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules) (Dec. 17, 2015); Convention on the Rights of the Child, Nov. 20, 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3.[42] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[43] Parvatkar Krishna Rishikesh & Sunil Kulhare, Reformative Outlook on Criminal Justice and Major Legal Codes: An Analysis of India’s Transformative Criminal Law Reforms, MJAP J., Vol. 1, Issue 2 (2025).[44] Abhilash Sontake, The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: A Paradigm Shift in Indian Criminal Jurisprudence, Abhilash Sontake & Associates (Apr. 18, 2026).[45] Id.[46] Mohd. Giasuddin v. State of A.P., AIR 1977 SC 1926.[47] Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1978 SC 1675.[48] Roger Hopkins Burke, An Introduction to Criminological Theory (5th ed. 2018).[49] National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics India 2023 (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2025).[50] G.A. Res. 70/175, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules) (Dec. 17, 2015).[51] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[52] Id. § 479.[53] National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics India 2023 (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2025).[54] Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1369.[55] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[56] Id. §§ 173, 530.[57] Id. § 530(2).[58] Id. § 530(3).[59] Roger Hopkins Burke, An Introduction to Criminological Theory (5th ed. 2018).[60] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.[61] Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, No. 47 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[62] Id. § 65B.[63] Id. § 114A.[64] Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 4 SCC 158.[65] Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, No. 47 of 2023, Gazette of India (Dec. 25, 2023).[66] Id. §§ 5–11.[67] Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 803(6), U.S. Code (2023).[68] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-46754573/“FROM PUNISHMENT TO REHABILITATION: A CRITICAL A
CLIMATE LITIGATION AND PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE: LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN HUMAN-INDUCED DISASTERS
Open Access

CLIMATE LITIGATION AND PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE: LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN HUMAN-INDUCED DISASTERS

Authors: PROF. DR. MEENAKUMARY S & DANNY VARGHESE
Registration ID: 107075 | Published Paper ID: WBL7074 & WBL7075
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 496-506
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Mishra, Praveen. ‘Joshimath Subsidence Linked to Human Activity’. The Secretariat, The Secretariat, 3 November 2023. https://thesecretariat.in/article/five-reasons-why-joshimath-subsidence-is-a-man-made-tragedy-not-a-natural-disaster.[2] Pandey, Kiran. ‘Wayanad District Is Highly Vulnerable to Disaster — Data and History Are Testament’. Down To Earth, Down To Earth, 2 August 2024. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/natural-disasters/wayanad-district-is-highly-vulnerable-to-disaster-data-and-history-are-testament.[3] LawBhoomi. M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1996). https://lawbhoomi.com/m-c-mehta-vs-kamal-nath-and-others/[4] Heri, Corina. ‘Leghari v. Pakistan’. Climate and Human Rights Litigation Database, 25 January 2018. https://climaterightsdatabase.com/2018/01/25/leghari-v-pakistan/.[5] Duke.Edu. 2026. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=delpf.[6] Duke.Edu. 2026. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=delpf.[7] Chung, Jeanie. ‘Precedent Setting’. The University of Chicago Magazine, 2020. https://mag.uchicago.edu/law-policy-society/precedent-setting.[8] Mishra, Praveen. ‘Joshimath Subsidence Linked to Human Activity’. The Secretariat, The Secretariat, 3 November 2023. https://thesecretariat.in/article/five-reasons-why-joshimath-subsidence-is-a-man-made-tragedy-not-a-natural-disaster.[9] Pandey, Kiran. ‘Wayanad District Is Highly Vulnerable to Disaster — Data and History Are Testament’. Down To Earth, Down To Earth, 2 August 2024. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/natural-disasters/wayanad-district-is-highly-vulnerable-to-disaster-data-and-history-are-testament.[10] Verma, Ayush. ‘Public Trust Doctrine in India’. iPleaders, 22 August 2023. https://blog.ipleaders.in/public-trust-doctrine-india/.[11] Ghosh, Shibani. Indian Environmental Law Key Concepts and Principles. Orient BlackSwan, 2019. https://www.orientblackswan.com/pdfs/opaccess/html/9789352875795/chapter6/chapter6.html.[12] IndianRepublic.in. ‘Enforcement vs Law — The Indian Governance Gap’. Writesaket, Blogger, 14 May 2026. https://www.indianrepublic.in/2026/05/enforcement-vs-law-indian-governance-gap.html.[13] Reddy, Jyothi. (2026). Climate Law and Environmental Governance in India: Emerging Judicial Trends. Indian JournalofLaw.4.35-52.10.36676/ijl.v4.i1.154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400121601_Climate_Law_and_Environmental_Governance_in_India_Emerging_Judicial_Trends[14] Reddy, Jyothi. (2026). Climate Law and Environmental Governance in India: Emerging Judicial Trends. Indian JournalofLaw.4.35-52.10.36676/ijl.v4.i1.154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400121601_Climate_Law_and_Environmental_Governance_in_India_Emerging_Judicial_Trends[15] IndianRepublic.in. ‘Why Enforcement Is the Weak Link in Rule of Law’. Writesaket, Blogger, 20 May 2026. https://www.indianrepublic.in/2026/05/why-enforcement-weak-link-rule-of-law-india.html.[16] Saba. ‘Uttaranchal High Court’s Order Declaring Ganga, Yamuna as Living Entities Stayed’. SCC Times, 8 July 2017. https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2017/07/08/uttaranchal-high-courts-order-declaring-ganga-yamuna-as-living-entities-stayed/.[17] Heri, Corina. ‘Leghari v. Pakistan’. Climate and Human Rights Litigation Database, 25 January 2018. https://climaterightsdatabase.com/2018/01/25/leghari-v-pakistan/.
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-93662776/CLIMATE LITIGATION AND PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE: LEGA
DRUG ABUSE AMONG YOUTH: IS THE NDPS ACT SUFFICIENT OR SHOULD INDIA SHIFT TOWARDS A PUBLIC HEALTH MODEL?
Open Access

DRUG ABUSE AMONG YOUTH: IS THE NDPS ACT SUFFICIENT OR SHOULD INDIA SHIFT TOWARDS A PUBLIC HEALTH MODEL?

Authors: Prakhar Jaiswal
Registration ID: 107073 | Published Paper ID: WBL7073
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 479-495
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] United Nations Office on Drugs & Crime, World Drug Report 2025: Methodological Annex, at 19 (2025), UNODC World Drug Report (last visited Aug. 5, 2026). (unodc.org)[2] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, No. 61 of 1985, pmbl. (India), India Code (last visited Aug. 6, 2026). (indiacode.nic.in)[3] Id. § 4.[4] Id. § 7A.[5] Ministry of Soc. Just. & Empowerment, Gov't of India, National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction, NAPDDR (last visited Aug. 7, 2026). (socialjustice.gov.in)[6] Id.; Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Soc. Just. & Empowerment, Gov't of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment Has Launched the National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction (Aug. 1, 2023), PIB (last visited Aug. 8, 2026). (pib.gov.in)[7] Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Gov't of India, Measures to Prevent Drug Abuse and Combat Illegal Drug Trade (Mar. 18, 2025), PIB (last visited Aug. 9, 2026). (pib.gov.in)[8] Ministry of Soc. Just. & Empowerment, Gov't of India, National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction, supra note 6.[9] INDIA CONST. art. 21.[10] State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh, (1999) 6 SCC 172.[11] Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, No. 61 of 1985, §§ 27, 64A (India).[12] Gaunter Edwin Kircher v. State of Goa, (1993) 3 SCC 145.[13] P.P. Beeran v. State of Kerala (2001).[14] Basheer @ N.P. Basheet v. State of Kerala (2004).[15] Ayub Khan v. State of Rajasthan (2002).[16] Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora, Crim. App. No. 1319 of 2013 (S.C. Apr. 17, 2025).[17] Rijesh Ravindran v. Union of India (Karn. H.C. July 28, 2021).[18] Baldev Singh, (1999) 6 SCC 172.[19] State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh, (1994) 3 SCC 299; Baldev Singh, (1999) 6 SCC 172.[20] Union of India v. Mohanlal, (2016) 3 SCC 379.[21] Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, No. 61 of 1985, §§ 64A, 71 (India).[22] Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Gov't of India, National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction.[23] Press Information Bureau, Gov't of India, Measures to Prevent Drug Abuse and Combat Illegal Drug Trade (Mar. 18, 2025).[24] Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, No. 61 of 1985, § 64A (India).
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-77435294/DRUG ABUSE AMONG YOUTH: IS THE NDPS ACT SUFFICIENT
The Role of Bloom's Taxonomy in Legal  Education
Open Access

The Role of Bloom's Taxonomy in Legal Education

Authors: V.R.KALYANI
Registration ID: 107072 | Published Paper ID: WBL7072
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 463-478
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
V R KALYANI. “The Role of Bloom's Taxonomy in Legal Education.” White Black Legal – International Law Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-41499896/The Role of Blooms Taxonomy in Legal Education
The Interface between International Refugee Protection Standards and Domestic Public Policy in India: A Global Justice Perspective
Open Access

The Interface between International Refugee Protection Standards and Domestic Public Policy in India: A Global Justice Perspective

Authors: SHEIK SHINY HANEEFA
Registration ID: 107071 | Published Paper ID: WBL7071
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 449-462
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Marconi Debbarma, ‘Refugees Experience and the Host Communities: Critical Analyses on Absence of Refugee Law in India’ (2025) 60 Journal of Asian and African Studies 3204 available at: <https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096241228804> accessed 28 August 2026.[2] Erika Feller, ‘The Evolution of the International Refugee Protection Regime’ (2001) 5 Journal of Law & Policy.[3] Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954) 189 UNTS 137 (Refugee Convention).[4] UN General Assembly, Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 31 January 1967, United Nations, Treaty Series, 606 UNTS 267.[5] Guy S Goodwin-gill, ‘The Dynamic of International Refugee Law’ (2014) 25 International Journal of Refugee Law 651 available at: <https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeu003> accessed 30 August 2026.[6] Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, ‘International Refugee Law and Refugee Policy: The Case of Deterrence Policies’ [2014] Journal of Refugee Studies available at: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2487087> accessed 26 August 2026.[7] Refugee Convention (n 1) art 1A (2).[8] David W Kennedy and David Kennedy, ‘International Refugee Protection, 8 Hum’, vol 1 (1986) available at <http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16082842> accessed 28 August 2026.[9] Feller (n 2).[10] Refugee Convention (n 2) art 33.[11]International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), art. 7, (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171.[12] Arun Sagar and Farrah Ahmed, ‘The Model Law for Refugees: An Important Step Forward?’, vol 17 (2005) available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/44290310> accessed 28 August 2026.[13] Registration of Foreigners Act 1939, S 2.[14] Sanjay S Bang, ‘The Status of Refugee in India: Need for a Domestic Legislation for Protection of Their Human Rights’ (2012) 1.[15] Prabodh Saxena, ‘Creating Legal Space for Refugees in India: The Milestones Crossed and the Roadmap for the Future’ (2007) 19 International Journal of Refugee Law 246 available at: <https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eem007> accessed 28 August 2026.[16] ‘77th Meeting of the Standing Committee - Update on Budgets and Funding (2019, 2020-2021) | UNHCR’ available at: <https://www.unhcr.org/media/77th-meeting-standing-committee-update-budgets-and-funding-2019-2020-2021> accessed 28 August 2026.[17] David W Kennedy and David Kennedy, ‘International Refugee Protection, 8 Hum’, vol 1 (1986) available at: <http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16082842> accessed 30 August 2026.[18] Ibid.[19] The Constitution of India 1950, art 51(A).[20] Vishaka & Ors vs State of Rajasthan & Ors, (1997) 6 SCC 241.[21] The Constitution of India 1950, art 51(c).[22] Ibid art 253.[23] V/O Tractor Export, Moscow v. M/S Tarapore & Co, 1969 SCC (3) 562.[24] Mr. Louis De Raedt & Ors vs Union of India and Ors, 1991 AIR 1886.[25] State of Arunachal Pradesh v Khudiram Chakma, AIR 1994 SC 1461[26] Dr Malavika Karlekar v Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No 583 of 1992 Supreme Court of India.[27] Mohammad Salimullah v Union of India, AIR 2021 SC (Civil) 1753.[28] Union of India v Nandita Haksar Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No(s) 2184/2022.[29] Zothansangpui v. State of Manipur, C.R No.981 of 1989.[30] Nuang Maung Mye Nyant v. Govt. of India, CWP No. 5120/94.[31] Shar Aung v. Govt. Of India, GI.WP NO.110 of 1998.[32] Seyed Ata Mohammadi v. Union of India and Others, A.D. No. 1458 of 1994[33] Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency, 1955 SCR (1)1284.[34] Ktaer Abbas Habib Al Qutaifi v. Union of India, 1999 CriLJ 919.[35] Aswathy Madhukumar, ‘Internatıonal Law in India: Analyzing the Legal and Policy Framework Through International and Refugee Laws’ (2023) 2 IUS LAW JOURNAL.[36] Ambika Verma and Fellow Jindal Global, ‘Global Compact on Refugees: Bridging the Gap Between International and Domestic Refugee Regime in India’, available at <https://ssrn.com/abstract=4450953> accessed 28 August 2026.[37] Aishwarya Birla, ‘Evaluating the Indian Refugee Law Regime: How Has the Judiciary Responded to Refugee Claims in Light of International Law Obligations, and How Can It Do Better?’ (2023) 35 International Journal of Refugee Law 81, available at <https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eead013> accessed 28 August 2026.[38] V Suryanarayan, 'Humanitarian Concerns and Security Needs: Sri Lankan Refugees in Tamil Nadu' in P Chari and others (eds), Refugees in India (Manak Publications 2003) 55–56.[39]Rajeev Dhavan, On the Model Law for Refugees: A Response to the National Human Rights Commission(2003), available at: <http://www.pilsarc.org/aow/ 64.pdf> accessed 28 August 2026.
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-96863284/The Interface between International Refugee Protec
Reconceptualizing the Dialectical Relationship Between Law and Society: A Socio-Legal Inquiry
Open Access

Reconceptualizing the Dialectical Relationship Between Law and Society: A Socio-Legal Inquiry

Authors: SHRUTI YADAV
Registration ID: 107070 | Published Paper ID: WBL7070
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 426-448
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] “Interrelationship Of Law And Society,” available at: https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-3334-interrelationship-of-law-and-society.html (last visited May 9, 2026).[2] Pratik Tiwari, “Cooling‑Off And Committees: New Path For Section 85 BNS Reform” Live Law, 10 August 2025.[3] Bhumika Indulia, “Electronic Evidence in Focus: Navigating Legal Shifts in the Law on Electronic Evidence under the BSA, 2023” SCC Times, 2024 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/10/23/electronic-evidence-in-focus-navigating-legal-shifts-in-the-law-on-electronic-evidence-under-the-bsa-2023/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[4] Editor, “Law on Domestic Violence [Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005]” SCC Times, 2020 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2020/07/27/law-on-domestic-violence-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[5] Editor, “Section 173(3) BNSS Explained: FIR, Preliminary Enquiry & Legislative Intent” SCC Times, 2026 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2026/01/17/section-173-3-bnss-statutory-interpretation-fir-registration/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[6] Marc Galanter, “Introduction: The Study of the Indian Legal Profession” 3(2/3) Law & Society Review 201–218 (1968–1969). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3052998[7] Marc Galanter, “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change” 9(1) Law & Society Review 95–160 (1974). Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-society-review/article/why-the-haves-come-out-ahead-speculations-on-the-limits-of-legal-change/8A16E3B6212A1A61E196841F092CF428[8] Marc Galanter, “The Displacement of Traditional Law in Modern India” 24(4) Journal of Social Issues 65–91 (1968). Available at: https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/item/30867[9] Upendra Baxi, “Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India” 4 Third World Legal Studies 107–132 (1985). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol4/iss1/6/[10] S. P. Sathe, “Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience” 6 Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29–46 (2001). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol6/iss1/3/[11] Rajeev Dhavan, “Promises, Promises…: Human Rights in India” 39 Journal of the Indian Law Institute 149–183 (1997). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43953266[12] Rajeev Dhavan, “The Press and the Constitutional Guarantee of Free Speech and Expression” 28 Journal of the Indian Law Institute 299–335 (1986). Available at: https://www.rajeevdhavan.com/articles/[13] Rajeev Dhavan, “Means, Motives and Opportunities: Reflecting on Legal Research in India” 50(6) The Modern Law Review 725–749 (1987). Available at: https://www.rajeevdhavan.com/articles/[14] Nick Robinson, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Indian Supreme Court’s Workload” 10(3) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 570–601 (2013). Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v10y2013i3p570-601.html[15] Daniela Berti, “Hostile Witnesses, Judicial Interactions and Out-of-Court Narratives in a North Indian District Court” 44(3) Contributions to Indian Sociology 235–263 (2010). Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/006996671004400302[16] Cynthia Farid, “Perceiving law without colonialism: Revisiting courts and constitutionalism in South Asia,” 19 International Journal of Law in Context 278–95.[17] Ibid.[18] Editor, “Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Archives” SCC Times available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/tag/hindu-marriage-act-1955/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[19] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK, “Legal Protections For Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes: Understanding The Framework” Live Law, 16 April 2025.[20] “Constitutional Law of India - Chapter 8,” Right to freedom available at: http://student.manupatra.com/Academic/Abk/Constitutional-Law-of-India/CHAPTER-8.htm (last visited May 9, 2026).[21] Ibid.[22] Editor, “Section 173(3) BNSS Explained: FIR, Preliminary Enquiry & Legislative Intent” SCC Times, 2026 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2026/01/17/section-173-3-bnss-statutory-interpretation-fir-registration/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[23] Malika Bhola, “right to information Archives” SCC Times available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/tag/right_to_information/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[24] Md Muneeb Hussain, “The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act: Ensuring Justice And Equality For Marginalized Communities” Live Law, 2 July 2024.[25] Bhumika Indulia, “Electronic Evidence in Focus: Navigating Legal Shifts in the Law on Electronic Evidence under the BSA, 2023” SCC Times, 2024 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/10/23/electronic-evidence-in-focus-navigating-legal-shifts-in-the-law-on-electronic-evidence-under-the-bsa-2023/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[26] Ritu, “Article 25 Archives” SCC Times available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/tag/article-25/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[27] “Constitutionality of the FRA,” Supreme Court Observer, 2021 available at: https://www.scobserver.in/cases/constitutionality-of-the-frawildlife-first-v-ministry-of-forest-and-environment-eviction-of-forest-dwellers-background/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[28] Shailesh Gandhi & Sandeep Jalan, “Supreme Court Judgments On Right To Information Act 2005: Wither Transparency?” Live Law, 6 July 2018.[29] Editor, “Section 173(3) BNSS Explained: FIR, Preliminary Enquiry & Legislative Intent” SCC Times, 2026 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2026/01/17/section-173-3-bnss-statutory-interpretation-fir-registration/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[30] Gaurav Wahie and Vasudha Luniya, “The Legality And Admissibility Of Electronic Signatures In The Modern World– A Look At The Laws In India” Live Law, 10 May 2019.[31] Editor, “Digital Personal Data Protection Rules 2025: Key Highlights” SCC Times, 2025 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/12/26/digital-personal-data-protection-rules-2025-key-highlights/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[32] Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461[33] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248; AIR 1978 SC 597[34] Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 Supp (3) SCC 217; AIR 1993 SC 477[35] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241; AIR 1997 SC 3011[36] Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, (1985) 3 SCC 545; AIR 1986 SC 180[37] Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1; AIR 2015 SC 1523[38] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1[39] Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1[40] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1[41] Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India, (2018) 5 SCC 1[42] Bhumika Indulia, “Juxtaposition between Development and Tribal Rights: A Story of Determined Struggle of Niyamgiri Tribes” SCC Times, 2019 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2019/08/09/juxtaposition-between-development-and-tribal-rights-a-story-of-determined-struggle-of-niyamgiri-tribes/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[43] Rahul G, “Access To Justice For Rural People And Entrepreneurs: Challenges & Legal Reforms” Live Law, 15 May 2025.[44] Bhumika Indulia, “Electronic Evidence in Focus: Navigating Legal Shifts in the Law on Electronic Evidence under the BSA, 2023” SCC Times, 2024 available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/10/23/electronic-evidence-in-focus-navigating-legal-shifts-in-the-law-on-electronic-evidence-under-the-bsa-2023/ (last visited May 9, 2026).[45] Abhiraj Jayant, “How To Fulfill Requirements Of Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence Under Bhartiya Sakshay Adhiniyam,...” Live Law, 26 June 2024.
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-51393921/Reconceptualizing the Dialectical Relationship Bet
The Anders Breivik Attacks – Lone-Wolf Terrorism, Ideological Crime and Penal Response
Open Access

The Anders Breivik Attacks – Lone-Wolf Terrorism, Ideological Crime and Penal Response

Authors: GARIMA KUMARI & MOHIT SINGH
Registration ID: 107068 | Published Paper ID: WBL7068 & WBL7069
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 411-425
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Norwegian Police Service, Report on the 22 July Terror Attacks (2012)[2] 2011 Norway Attacks: Government of Norway Official Report (2012).[3] Anders Behring Breivik, 2083: A European Declaration of Independence (2011).[4] Norwegian Ministry of Justice & Public Security, White Paper on Terrorism Response (2013).[5] Andrew Silke, Terrorists, Victims and Society (John Wiley & Sons 2003).[6] Jerrold M. Post, The Mind of the Terrorist (2007).[7] Marc Sageman, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century (Univ. Pa. Press 2008).[8] European Commission, Radicalisation Awareness Network Report (2016).[9] Robert K. Merton, Social Structure and Anomie, 3 Am. Soc. Rev. (1938).[10] The People v. Anders Behring Breivik (Nor. 2012).[11] Travis Hirschi, Causes of Delinquency (1969).[12] Lawrence E. Cohen & Marcus Felson, Social Change and Crime Rate Trends, [volume] Am. Soc. Rev. (1979).[13]Robert K. Merton, Social Structure and Anomie, 3 Am. Soc. Rev. (1938).[14] Paul Gill, Lone-Actor Terrorists (Routledge 2015).[15] Norway Attacks: Breivik Sentenced to Preventive Detention, BBC News (2012).[16] United Nations Office on Drugs & Crime, Handbook on Criminal Justice Responses to Terrorism (2017).[17] Europol, European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) (2017).[18] Stuart Hall, The Work of Representation (1997).[19] Yvonne Jewkes, Media and Crime (2015).[20] Human Rights Watch, Norway: Justice Response to Terrorism (2013).
DOI: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-62981939/The Anders Breivik Attacks – Lone-Wolf Terrorism
THE ANDERS BREIVIK ATTACKS – LONE-WOLF TERRORISM, IDEOLOGICAL CRIME AND PENAL RESPONSE BY - GARIMA KUMARI & MOHIT SINGH
Open Access

THE ANDERS BREIVIK ATTACKS – LONE-WOLF TERRORISM, IDEOLOGICAL CRIME AND PENAL RESPONSE BY - GARIMA KUMARI & MOHIT SINGH

Authors: GARIMA KUMARI & MOHIT SINGH
Registration ID: 107068 | Published Paper ID: WBL7068 & WBL7069
Year: Sep- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 411-425
Vol. 4 Issue 1 September 2026
[1] Norwegian Police Service, Report on the 22 July Terror Attacks (2012)[2] 2011 Norway Attacks: Government of Norway Official Report (2012).[3] Anders Behring Breivik, 2083: A European Declaration of Independence (2011).[4] Norwegian Ministry of Justice & Public Security, White Paper on Terrorism Response (2013).[5] Andrew Silke, Terrorists, Victims and Society (John Wiley & Sons 2003).[6] Jerrold M. Post, The Mind of the Terrorist (2007).[7] Marc Sageman, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century (Univ. Pa. Press 2008).[8] European Commission, Radicalisation Awareness Network Report (2016).[9] Robert K. Merton, Social Structure and Anomie, 3 Am. Soc. Rev. (1938).[10] The People v. Anders Behring Breivik (Nor. 2012).[11] Travis Hirschi, Causes of Delinquency (1969).[12] Lawrence E. Cohen & Marcus Felson, Social Change and Crime Rate Trends, [volume] Am. Soc. Rev. (1979).[13]Robert K. Merton, Social Structure and Anomie, 3 Am. Soc. Rev. (1938).[14] Paul Gill, Lone-Actor Terrorists (Routledge 2015).[15] Norway Attacks: Breivik Sentenced to Preventive Detention, BBC News (2012).[16] United Nations Office on Drugs & Crime, Handbook on Criminal Justice Responses to Terrorism (2017).[17] Europol, European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) (2017).[18] Stuart Hall, The Work of Representation (1997).[19] Yvonne Jewkes, Media and Crime (2015).[20] Human Rights Watch, Norway: Justice Response to Terrorism (2013).