ISSN 2581-8503 Double-Blind Peer Review Open Access Monthly Journal Publication Cycle September 2026
Peer-Reviewed · Open Access · Monthly Sep 2026
Research Discovery

Search Publications

Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.

Clear Search

Search Results

3,971 publications
Critical Analysis of Problem of Non- Performing Assets in the Indian Banking Industry BY - Shreya Raj & Ujjwal Kumar Singh
Open Access

Critical Analysis of Problem of Non- Performing Assets in the Indian Banking Industry BY - Shreya Raj & Ujjwal Kumar Singh

Authors: Shreya Raj & Ujjwal Kumar Singh
Registration ID: 102861 | Published Paper ID: 2861 & 2862
Year : May -2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link: https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/critical-analysis-of-problem-of-non--performing-assets-in-the-indian-banking-industry-by---shreya-raj-ujjwal-kumar-singh

[i] Reserve Bank of India,  https://www.rbi.org.in/commonperson/English/scripts/Notification.aspx?Id=889 (last visited  April 4, 2024)   [ii] Subhamoy Das, Commercial Banks and Industrial Finance in India: The Pre Liberalization Scenario,   XXXV & XXXVI,  BUSINESS STUDIES, 1, 8 & 9, (2014 & 2015)   [iii] State Bank of India v. Rajesh Agarwal, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 342 [iv] Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, S. 13, No. 54, Acts if Parliament, 2002 (India) [v] Santosh Kumar Das, Two Phases of NPAs in India’s Banks, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development,1, 2 (2021),  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://isid.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/WP240.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjss7qbtsyFAxUNd2wGHWRnCkEQFnoECBMQBg&usg=AOvVaw1k5Q2H3pZE7VMScxHGbvHX   [vi] Sulagna Das and Abhijit Dutta, A Study on NPA of Public Sector Banks in India, 16, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 75,  77 (2014)  [vii] Waseem Ahmad, Non – Performing Assets In The Banks: Causes, Stress and Remedies, 4, Review of Professional Management, 70, 71 (2006)  [viii] Legal History before passing SARFAESI Act , https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/legal-history-before-passing-sarfaesi-act-4688.asp (last visited April 15, 2024)   [ix]  The Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, No. 54, Acts of Parliament  2002 (India)   [x] Press Information Bureau, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1990752#:~:text=EASE%20was%20conceptualized%20to%20improve,HR%20transformation%20and%20Governance%20etc (last visited  April 17, 2024)   [xi] Amit Kumar Singh and Renuka Prasad, A Trend Analysis of NPAs of Banks in India for 2008-2018,  Business Analyst, 23, 30 (2020)
"Market Competition and Innovation: The Effect of Patent Law on Antitrust Laws" BY - KESHAV GARG & VANSHIKA KHANDELWAL
Open Access

"Market Competition and Innovation: The Effect of Patent Law on Antitrust Laws" BY - KESHAV GARG & VANSHIKA KHANDELWAL

Authors: KESHAV GARG & VANSHIKA KHANDELWAL
Registration ID: 102859 | Published Paper ID: 2859 & 2860
Year : May -2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link: https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/%22market-competition-and-innovation-the-effect-of-patent-law-on-antitrust-laws%22-by---keshav-garg

FASHION AND IP BY - DR. RAJU NARAYANA SWAMY IAS
Open Access

FASHION AND IP BY - DR. RAJU NARAYANA SWAMY IAS

Authors: DR. RAJU NARAYANA SWAMY IAS
Registration ID: 102858 | Published Paper ID: 2858
Year : May -2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-41126637/FASHION AND IP

[i] Ralph Lauren, Good Reads, https://www.good reads.com/quotes/538638 – fashion-is-not-necessarily-about-labels-it-is-not-about-brands [ii] Microfibres Inc Vs Giridhar & Co.2006 (32) PTC 157(Del) [iii] Case No.CS(OS)1446 of 2011 decided on 15.5.2013 [iv] Some authors add two more to this list-diffusion and bridge. [v] Nicole Giambarrese, The Look for Less: A survey of intellectual property protections in the Fashion Industry, 26 Tourol.Rev.243(2010) [vi] Philip Liu, An Open Shield:Antitrust Arguments against Extending copyright protection to Fashion Designs, 23 INFO.&COMM.TECH.L.,159 (2014)  [vii] Philip Liu, An Open Shield: Antitrust Arguments against Extending Copyright Protection to Fashion Desings, 23 INFO&COMM.TECH.L.159(2014) [viii] Kimberly A. Harchuck, Fashion Design Protection. The Eternal Plight of the soft sculpture, 4 AKRON INTELLPROP-073 (2010).  [ix] Manaswini Raj, Flashing Badges and Design-copyright: A case comment, 22 NATL, Sch.India, Rev.199(2010).  [x] Susanna Monseau, “ European Design Right : A Model for the Protection of All Designers from Piracy”, American Business Law Journal, Vol 46, Issue 1, Spring 2011. [xi] Case C-345/13, CJEU, June 19,2014. [xii] Tribunal de commerce, Paris, May 18,1994, E.C.C.1994, 512(Fr) [xiii] Legge 22 aprile 1941, n.633 in G.U, Jul.7,1941,n.166,art 2(10) (lt.) available at http://wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=10311. [xiv] Mario Franzosi, Design Protection Italian Style, 1 J. Intellectual Property Law & Prac.599,602 (2006).
Constitutional Safeguards Against Preventive Detention In India- A Legal Analysis BY - DR. K. LATHA
Open Access

Constitutional Safeguards Against Preventive Detention In India- A Legal Analysis BY - DR. K. LATHA

Authors: DR. K. LATHA
Registration ID: 102852 | Published Paper ID: 2852
Year : May -2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link : https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/constitutional-safeguards-against-preventive-detention-in-india--a-legal-analysis-by---dr-k-latha

[1] Principal (FAC), Government Law College, Tirunelveli. [2]Constituent Assembly Debates, 30th July 18th Sept 1949. Vol. IX, pp. 1447-98 [3]Article 21 reads: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. [4]Maneka Gandhi Vs Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597 [5]Clause (1) of Article 22 No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds, for such arrest nor shall be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice. [6]"Clause (2) of Article 22: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate. [7]Clause 3(1) & (b) of Article 22; Nothing in clauses (1) and (2) shall apply –(a) to any person who for the time being is an enemy alien. b) to any person who is arrested or detained under any law or providing for preventive detention [8]By constitution (forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 Sub-clause(a) of clause (7) has been omitted and sub-clause(b) and (c) re-lettered as sub-clauses (a) and (b). But this Amendment has not come into force so far. [9]Purazlal Lakhanpal Vs Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 163. [10]Ujagar Singh Vs Punjab, AIR 1952 SC 350 [11]Madhab Roy Vs West Bengal, AIR 1975 SC 225 [12]AIR 1975 SC 255. [13]Jain, M.P: 'Indian Constitutional Law, N.M. Tripathi Private ltd. Third Edition, 1978, pp 507-508. [14]Bombay Vs Vaidya, AIR 1951 SC 157. [15]AIR 1952 SC 350, AIR 1951 SC 174. [16]Raj Kishore Prasad Vs State of Bihar, AIR 1983 SC 320 [17]Maneka Gandhi Vs Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597. Kamla Vs State of Maharashtra AIR 1981 SC 814 [18]Punkaj Kumar Vs. State of West Bengal A.IR. 1979 SC 97. [19]K.B. Abdulla Kunhi Vs Union of India, (1991) I SCC 476. [20]AIR 1981 SC 814. [21]The (44th Amendment) Act, 1978. [22]A.K. Roy Vs Union of India AIR 198 CSC 710 p.15. [23]A.K. Roy Vs Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 710 p.715. [24]Puranlal lakhanpal Vs Union of India. (1958) SCR 460 p.475 [25]AIR 1950 SC 27 [26]AIR 1973 SC 1425. [27]Section 9, COFFPOSA: Section 14A, NSA: Section 10, PITNDPS [28]S.10. COFEPOSA: S.13 PREBLACT & NSA and S.11 PITNDPS. [29]S.8(c)(d)(e), COFEPOSA: S.11 PREBLACT & NSA and S.9 (c)(d)(e), PITNDPS [30]West Bengal Vs Ashok Dey, AIR 1972 SC 1660. [31]AIR 1974 SC 613.
NATIONAL LEGAL FRAME WORK TO COMBAT CUSTODIAL VIOLENCE IN INDIA-AN ANALYSIS BY - DR. K. LATHA
Open Access

NATIONAL LEGAL FRAME WORK TO COMBAT CUSTODIAL VIOLENCE IN INDIA-AN ANALYSIS BY - DR. K. LATHA

Authors: DR. K. LATHA
Registration ID: 102851 | Published Paper ID: 2851
Year : May -2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link : https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/national-legal-frame-work-to-combat-custodial-violence-in-india-an-analysis-by---dr-k-latha

[1] Principal (FAC), Government Law College, Tirunelveli. [2] AIR 2002 SC 556 [3] AIR 2017 SC 4161. [4] AIR 1963 SC 1295. [5]Domestic Implementation of Human Rights by KaushikDhar (NALSAR) University Feb 19,2012 [6] Custodial death and Anti Torture Law by AyushVerma [7]AIR 1973 SC 1461 [8] AIR 2000 SC 988. [9] (1997) 3 SCC 433. [10]AIR 1997 SC 3011. [11]AIR 1999 SC 625