Research Discovery
Search Publications
Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.
Search Results
3,971 publications
Open Access
Case study- Foss v Harbottle by - SINDHUJA R
Open Access
Can India Become The Hub For International Arbitration? by - SHASHWAT BHARDWAJ
[1] Shashwat Bhardwaj, 3rd Year, B.A. LLB, Delhi Metropolitan Education, GGSIPU, New Delhi, E-Mail ID – shashwatbhardwaj23@gmail.com
[2] Amarchand Lalit Kumar vs Shri Ambica Mills Ltd., 1966 AIR 1036, 1963 SCR (2) 953.
[3] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act 26 of 1996), s.10.
[4] United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958), art. II
[5] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act 26 of 1996) s.2(1)(f)
[6] TDM Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ue Development India Pvt. Ltd., Arbitration Application No. 2 Of 2008
[7] The Quest for making India as the Hub of International Arbitration, available at: https://www.pmindia.gov.in/en/news_updates/the-quest-for-making-india-as-the-hub-of-international-arbitration/
Open Access
Rights Of Arrested And Detained Persons: An Empirical Study In Delhi by - Dipanshu
[1] Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State of West Bengal, State Of U.P" SCC Online.
[2] Criminal Justice system.
[3] Legal News and Views" volume 20, May 5, 2006.
[4] Indian Constitutional law (6th Edition, 2010).
[5] Human Rights Protection and the Provisions of Human Rights under Constitution, Indian Bar Review (1983).
[6] Indian Viewpoint on the Human rights of Accused People (BBPM Law Associates, New Delhi, 2001).
[7] Human rights of adolescent offenders and accused: delinquents in legal trouble (Kalpaz Publications, 2005).
[8] Human Rights and Inhuman Wrongs (B.R. Publishing Company, New Delhi, 1990).
[9] The principle against ex-post facto laws.
[10] A.K Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR, 1950 SC 27.
[11] Halsbury’s, Laws Of England, Vol X, 1955, p.405-406.
[12] Constitution of India, Art.22 (1) “No one who is arrested may be held in detention without being promptly informed of the reasons for their detention, nor may they be refused the opportunity to speak with and be represented by a lawyer of their choosing..
[13] Section 50, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973..
[14] S. P. Dwivedi, Procedural Privileges of the Accused 10, Indian Advocate, 1970, p.75.
[15] Criminal Procedure Code, sec.56, 57.
16 Bengali Supreme Court and Archivist of Legal Affairs V. Zahir Ali, 37 Cr. L.J. 1070, 63 CAL 189.
17 The accused: A comparative analysis, by J.A. Coults, British Institute of Global International Law.
[18] Iqbal Kaur Kwatra v. Director General of Police, Jaipur, 1996 CrLJ 2600 (AI’-DB); see also Carbon Ali v. Intelligence Officer, Air Intelligence Unit, NIPt Salor, 1996 CrLJ 2420 (Born).
[19] 1978 Cri.L.J. 1062 (Pat.) See also observations in Shyam Dattaray beturkar v. Special Executive Magistrate, Kalyan, 1999 Cri.L.J. 2676 (Bom.H C )
[20] 1989 Cri.L.J. 383 (H. P.)
Open Access
THE ETHICS OF INHERITENCE: CAN A MURDERER LEGALLY INHERIT FROM THEIR VICTIM? bY - SHIBANI ROUT AND RUTUSHREE SAHU
[1] Eureka Forbes Limited vs. Allahabad Bank and Ors. MANU/SC/0322 (2010)
[2] The Hindu Succession Act,1956, Section 25, No. 30, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).
[3] Kenchava Sanyellappa Hosmani vs Girimalappa Channappa Somasagar, AIR Privy Council 209 (1924)
[4] Ibid
[5] M. Nagarajan v. V. M. Nagammal (2011) SCC ONLINE MAD 2547
[6]M. Nagarajan v. V. M. Nagammal(2011) SCC ONLINE MAD 2547)
[7] Smt. Janak Rani Chadha v. State (NCT of Delhi) AIR 2007 DELHI 107
[8] Mohinder Kaur & Ors. V. Wassan Singh & Ors., 1968 SCC OnLine P&H 67
[9] Vellikannu v. R. Singaperumal & Anr, (2005) 6 SCC 622
[10] Gangu vs. Chandrabhagabai (1908) 32 Bom. 275
[11] MANU/SC/0287/1966
[12] MANU/SC/0772/2013