ISSN 2581-8503 Double-Blind Peer Review Open Access Monthly Journal Publication Cycle September 2026
whiteblacklegal@gmail.com Public Submission No Login Required +91 9990670288
Public Submission Track Paper Verify Certificate
White Black Legal International Law Journal White Black Legal
International Law Journal ISSN 2581-8503
Peer-Reviewed · Open Access · Monthly Sep 2026
Research Discovery

Search Publications

Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.

Clear Search

Search Results

3,971 publications
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DOCTRINE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION BY – POOJA
Open Access

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DOCTRINE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION BY – POOJA

Authors: POOJA
Registration ID: 102991 | Published Paper ID: WBL2991
Year : July-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-54928323/COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DOCTRINE OF LEGITIMATE EX

[1] Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation, AIR 1994 SC 988 (India). [2] Findlay v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, (1984) AC 318 (India). [3] P.T.R Exports (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 3461 (India). [4] Schmidt v. Secretary of State for Home Affairs, (1969) 1 ALL ER 904. [5] Attorney General for Hong Kong v. Ng Yuen Shin, (1983) 2 All ER 346. [6] LEWIS, CLIVE, Judicial remedies in public law, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004. [7] R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ruddock, (1987) 1 WLR 1482. [8] R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khan, [1985] 1 All ER 40. [9] TREVOR ZEYL, Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law, 49 ALTA. L. REV. 203 (2011). [10] R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hargreaves, [1997] 1 WLR 906. [11] Kioa v. West, (1985) 159 CLR 583. [12] R v. Secretary of State for Health, ex parte United States tobacco, (1992) QB 353. [13] State of Kerala v. K.G. Madhavan Pillai, AIR 1989 SC 49 (India). [14] IP MASSEY, Administrative Law (9th ed., 2005). [15] Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation, (1993) 3 SCC 499 (India). [16] Food Corporation of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, (1993) 1 SCC 71 (India). [17] Navjyoti Corporation Group Housing Society v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 155 (India). [18] Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation, AIR 1990 SC 1031 (India). [19] Suseela v. University Grants Commission, (2015) 8 SCC 129 (India). [20] Madras City Wine Merchants Association v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 5 SCC 509 (India). [21] Bajaj Hindustan Limited v. Sir Shadi Lal Enterprise Private Limited, (2011) 1 SCC 640 (India). [22] State of Haryana v. Jagdish, (2010) 4 SCC 216. [23] Perry v. Sindermann, [1972] 408 U.S. 593. [24] Shaball v. State Compensation Ins. Auth., 799 P.2d 399. [25] JAYANTA CHAKRABORTY, Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation - A Comparative Study of UK, USA & India, 5 INDIAN J.L. & PUB. POL'y 21 (2018). [26] CAROL HARLOW, Fault Liability in French and English Public Law, The Modern Law Review, 516-541, (1976). [27] CHESTER BROWN, The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a 'General Principle of Law': Some Preliminary Thoughts, Transnational Dispute Management (2009). [28] JOE TOMLINSON, Do we need a theory of legitimate expectations? Legal Studies, 286-300 (2020). [29] MARTA VICENTE, Property Rights and Legitimate Expectations Under United States Constitutional Law and The European Convention on Human Rights: Abstract Some Comparative Remarks (2022). [30] Entreprise Transports Freymuth TA Strasbourg, [1995] PL 657. [31] REBECCA WILLIAMS, Unjust Enrichment and Public Law: A Comparative Study of England, France and the EU, Oxford Hart Publishing (2010). [32] ALEXANDER BROWN, Justifying Compensation for Frustrated Legitimate Expectations, Law and PHILOSOPHY, 30, 699–728 (2011).
View Article PDF Google Scholar
Navigating Intellectual Property Rights: The Legal Battle Over Captain Marvel's Trademark And Copyright by - Shruti Gattani
Open Access

Navigating Intellectual Property Rights: The Legal Battle Over Captain Marvel's Trademark And Copyright by - Shruti Gattani

Authors:Shruti Gattani
Registration ID: 102989 | Published Paper ID: WBL2989
Year : July-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India

DOI Link :

[i]  “ C o p y r i g h t i n G e n e r a l ” (Copyright) < h t t p s : / / www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html> accessed November 19, 2020 [ii] “Trademark Basics” (United States Patent and Trademark Office - An Agency of the Department of CommerceSeptember 25, 2020) accessed November 19, 2020 [iii] National Comics Publications, Inc v Fawcett Publications, Inc et al, 191 F2d 594 (2d Cir 1951) (US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ) [iv] Lee N, “How a $4 Million Lawsuit Created 'Shazam!' and 'Captain Marvel' as We Know Them Today” (Business InsiderApril 5, 2019) accessed November 19, 2020. [v] Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt Ltd. v. RGV Productions Pvt. Ltd [2015] [CS (OS) 1892/2006] [vi] Arbaaz Khan v. Northstar Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (Suit (L) No. 301 of 2016)
View Article PDF Google Scholar