Research Discovery
Search Publications
Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.
Search Results
3,971 publications
Open Access
[1] “Jyh-An Lee & Reto Hilry & Kung- Chung Liu, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press (1st ed. 2021).”
[2] Raquel Acosta, Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Rights, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 2012. Available at: https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/artificial-intelligence-and-authorship-rights.
[3] “Joel Feldman, The art of artificial intelligence: a recent copyright law development, Attorney Analysis from Westlaw Today, a part of Thomson Reuters (2022), available at https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/art- artificial-intelligence-recent-copyright-law-development-2022-04-22/"
[4] “Shabbi S. Khan, Nikhil T. Pradhan, How to Overcome the Two Biggest Challenges of Patenting AI Technologies, Foley and Lardner LLP publications (2020), available at https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2020/02/how-overcome-challenges-patenting-ai-technologies/"
[5] “Jaliz Maldonado, Legal Ethics: The Ethical Dilemma of Artificial Intelligence, The National Law Review, Volume XIV, Number 50 (2024), available at https://www.natlawreview.com/article/legal-ethics-ethical- dilemma-artificial-intelligence"
[6] “John McCarthy, Basic Questions, What isArtificial Intelligence?, Stanford University, available at http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/index.html"
[7] “Himadri Pandya, Grishma Nair, Technical Advance and Economic Significance of Artificial Intelligence, IPR NEWSLETTER "Intellectual property isthe fuel that drives innovation & creativity... protect it fiercely." April - May, 2023, available at https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/Images/pdf/Final_CG_News_Letter_.pdf"
[8] “Raquel Acosta, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Rights', [ February, 2012] , Harvard Journal of Law and Technology , available at https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/artificial-intelligence-and-authorship-rights.”
[9] Supra note 2
[10] Supra note 2
[11] “M.C. Nwadiugwu, 'Neural Network, Artificial Intelligence and the Computational Brain', [2015], 3, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281374291"
[12] “Gil Appel, Juliana Neelbauer, and David A. Schweidel, Generative AI Has an Intellectual Property Problem, Harvard Business Review, 2023, available at https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property- problem”
[13] “Stephen Thaler v. Shira Perlmu er, Register of Copyrights and Director of the United States Copyright Office, et al. Civil Ac on No. 22-1564 (BAH).”
[14] Supra note 4
[15] “Copyright and Artificial Intelligence U.S. Copyright Office, https://copyright.gov/ai/”
[16] “Copyright Office Issues Notice of Inquiry on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Issue No. 1017 - August 30, 2023, U.S. Copyright Office, available at https://copyright.gov/newsnet/2023/1017.html"
[17] “Copyright Office Launches New Artificial Intelligence Initiative, Issue No. 1004 - March 16, 2023, U.S. Copyright Office, available at https://copyright.gov/newsnet/2023/1004.html"
[18] “avid De Cremer, Nicola Morini Bianzino, and Ben Falk, How Generative AI Could Disrupt Creative Work, Harvard Business Review, 2023, available at https://hbr.org/2023/04/how-generative-ai-could-disrupt-creative- work."
[19] “Burrow Gilles Lithographic v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884).”
[20] “Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239 (1903).”
[21] “Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc., 191 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1951).”
[22] “Navigators Logistics Ltd. vs Kashif Qureshi & Ors, AIRONLINE 2018 DEL 1483”
[23] “Katarina Foss-Solbrekk, Three routes to protecting AI systems and their algorithms under IP law: The good, the bad and the ugly, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 16, Issue 3, 2021, Pages 247– 258, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab033."
[24] Supra note 5
[25] “Ahmed Elmallah, Artificial Intelligence Patenting: Top Challenges and Key Considerations, Bennet Jones Blogs, 2022, available at https://www.bennettjones.com/Blogs-Section/Artificial-Intelligence-Patenting-Top- Challenges-and-Key-Considerations.”
[26] “Liz Gray, Patenting the AI pipeline: intellectual property for AI before standardisation, I AM Innovation & Invention Yearbook, 2022, available at https://www.iam-media.com/global-guide/innovation-invention- yearbook/2022/article/patenting-the-ai-pipeline-intellectual-property-ai- standardisation#:~:text=AI%20standardisation%20of%20some%20form,with%20a%20specific%20technical%2 0standard.”
[27] “Rob Srebrovic, Jay Yonamine, How AI, and specifically BERT, helps the patent industry, Google Cloud Blog, 2020, available at https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/how-ai-improves-patent- analysis.”
[28] “Douglas R. Nemec, Laura M. Rann, AI and Patent Law: Balancing Innovation and Inventorship, Skedden publications, 2023, available at https://www.skadden.com/-/media/files/publications/2023/04/quarterly- insights/ai_and_patent_law_balancing_innovation_and_inventorship.pdf?rev=4bf3d044b5244043961e0ae9bf7c 34eb#:~:text=The%20issue%20of%20inventorship%20in,competitive%20edge%20in%20the%20marketplace.”
[29] Supra note 28
Open Access
An Inquiry Into Public Opinion On Hoarding Edible Items And Its Impact On Market Prices In Chennai BY - S.Divya
[1] Student; Saveetha School Of Law; Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Sciences(SIMATS);Chennai 600077;Email id:divyasenthil2404@gmail.com
Open Access
E
Open Access
LANDMARK JUDGMENTS IN THE COPYRIGHT LANDSCAPE: AN OVERVIEW BY - DR. RAJU NARAYANA SWAMY IAS
[i] AIR 1997 SC 3011: (1997) 5 SCALE 453
[ii] Lucas film Ltd Vs Ainswowrth(2011)UKSC39
[iii] (1866-67) LR2 Ch App 307
[iv] AIR 1940 PC 55:1940 AC 112
[v] AIR 2014 Mad 25: 2013 (5) LW 429
[vi] 2019(78) PTC 375 (Del) [CS(COMM:) 724/2017]
[vii] 2013 (54) PTC 419 (Del) (CS(OS) 1213 (2011))
[viii] (1937)3 ALL ER 503
[ix] (1900) AC 539
[x] 74 IPR 205
Open Access
LANDMARK JUDGMENTS IN THE COPYRIGHT LANDSCAPE: AN OVERVIEW BY - DR. RAJU NARAYANA SWAMY IAS
[i] AIR 1997 SC 3011: (1997) 5 SCALE 453
[ii] Lucas film Ltd Vs Ainswowrth(2011)UKSC39
[iii] (1866-67) LR2 Ch App 307
[iv] AIR 1940 PC 55:1940 AC 112
[v] AIR 2014 Mad 25: 2013 (5) LW 429
[vi] 2019(78) PTC 375 (Del) [CS(COMM:) 724/2017]
[vii] 2013 (54) PTC 419 (Del) (CS(OS) 1213 (2011))
[viii] (1937)3 ALL ER 503
[ix] (1900) AC 539
[x] 74 IPR 205
Open Access
ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN REDUCING GENDER DISPARITY AND PROMOTING UNIFORM CIVIL CODE-AN ANALYSIS BY - MRS. S. PRASANNA
[1] Assistant Professor, Government Law College, Tirunelveli.
[2] AIR 1952 Bom 84
[3] AIR 1985 SC 945
[4] (2001) 7 SCC 740
[5] Ibid.
[6] AIR 1985 SC 935
[7] AIR 2003 SC 2902
[8] Ibid.
[9] AIR 2017 9 SCC 1 (SC)
[10] (2000) 8 SCC 587
[11] 1983 (1) Bom CR 395
[12] AIR 1985 SC 945
[13] AIR 1995 SC 1531
[14] AIR 2003 SC 2902
Open Access
JUDICIAL PROCESS -DOCTRINE OF HARMONIOUS CONSTRUCTION BY - ARRTHI M
[1] Author: Arrthi M B.Sc., LL.B Hons., LL.M (IPR)- 2nd Year, School of Law, Pondicherry University, Kalapet - 605014.
[2] School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar
[3] Guest Faculty, Faculty of Law, Delhi University, Delhi
[4] The Central Provinces and Berar Vidya Mandir Act, 1939
[5] AIR 1951 SC 458
[6] AIR 1951 SC 318
[7] (1973) 4 SCC 225
[8] (2003) 3 SCC 57
[9] A.G. Varadarajulu v. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1998 SC 1388.
[10] Castrige v. Page, (1853) 138 ER 1278; Eastbourne Corporation v. Fortes Ltd., (1959) 2 All ER 102 CA; King v. Dominion Engineering Co. Ltd., AIR 1947 PV 94.
[11] 2003 (2) BLJR972
[12] The Constitution of India, art. 253
[13] ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
[14] Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel Vs. Union of India & ANR (1969) INSC 4
[15] Gramaphone Company of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey and Ors 1984 AIR 667
[16] Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011
[17] Safai Karmachari Andolan v. Union of India 2014 LAB IC 1949
[18] Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1
[19] Shayara bano vs Union of India AIR 2017 9 SCC 1 (SC)
[20] (1984) 2 SCALE 214
[21] Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India & Ors (1996) 5 SCC 647
[22] Mohammad Salimullah vs Union of India AIR 2021 SC 1789
Open Access
EMPOWERMENT OR ENTRAPMENT? LEGALISATION OF SEX WORKERS BY - MEGHNA SINGH & SAARAH KHAN
[1] UNAIDS. Guidance Note on HIV and Sex Work. UNAIDS, 2012. Accessed 25 June 2024.
[2] Bernstein, Elizabeth. "Temporarily Yours: Intimacy, Authenticity, and the Commerce of Sex." University of Chicago Press, 2007.
[3] World Health Organization. Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Public Health Surveillance. WHO, 2017. Accessed 25 June 2024
[4] Altman, Dennis. "Global Sex." University of Chicago Press, 2001.
[5] International Labour Organization. Convention No. 189 on Domestic Workers. ILO, 2011. Accessed 25 June 2024
[6] Sex Workers’ Rights Advocacy Network (SWAN). Report on Human Rights Violations Against Sex Workers in Europe. SWAN, 2020. Accessed 25 June 2024.
[7] Aggleton, Peter, and Richard Parker. "World AIDS Campaign: A Universal Precautionary Approach to Sex Work and HIV."
[8] Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Government of India. 1956.
[9] Bhootalingam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, 1996. Supreme Court of India, 15 Apr. 1996
[10] Budhadev Kisanlal Chaudhary v. State of Maharashtra, 2011. Supreme Court of India, 13 Apr. 2011.
[11] Durbar Sawh v. Bhikhaji, 2014. Supreme Court of India, 22 Sept. 2014.
[12] In Re: Vijay Mundlik, 2022. Supreme Court of India, 7 Feb. 2022.
[13] Carrabine, Eamonn, et al. "Criminology: A Sociological Introduction." 3rd ed., Routledge, 2017.
[14] Ditmore, Melissa Hope. "Sex Work Matters: Exploring Money, Power, and Intimacy in the Sex Industry." Zed Books, 2010.
[15] Enloe, Cynthia H. "Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics." University of California Press, 2014.
[16] Hamann, Heiko. "Institutional Change and Legislative Deliberation in India: A Look at the India of the Early 2000s." Routledge, 2018.
Open Access