Search Publications

[1] ANIRBAN SARMA, “A Pandemic of abuse: How India is protecting its children online.” Read this article at <https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/how-india-is-protecting-its-children-online/>

[2] Obi N.I. Ebbe and Dilip K. Das, Criminal Abuse of Women and Children: An International Perspective, Page56-57.

[3] Kelsey Becker and Catherine D. Marcum, “Sexual Victimization Online”, Sexual Victimization Then and Now, Tara N. Richards and Catherine D. Marcum, Sage Publications, California, Page 141-142.

[4] Supra Note 1.

[5] Supra Note 1

[1] ANIRBAN SARMA, “A Pandemic of abuse: How India is protecting its children online.” Read this article at <https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/how-india-is-protecting-its-children-online/>

[2] Obi N.I. Ebbe and Dilip K. Das, Criminal Abuse of Women and Children: An International Perspective, Page56-57.

[3] Kelsey Becker and Catherine D. Marcum, “Sexual Victimization Online”, Sexual Victimization Then and Now, Tara N. Richards and Catherine D. Marcum, Sage Publications, California, Page 141-142.

[4] Supra Note 1.

[5] Supra Note 1

[1] The Indian Contract Act, 1872 § 2(h), No. 9 of 1872, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India)

[2] Black’s Law Dictionary,9th Edition, p.365

[3] Black Law dictionary, 1573 ( 8th edn)

[4] C.K. Thakkar, Enclopediac Law Lexicon, Justice Volume 4 Ashoka Law House

[5] (1760) 2 Burr 1005 at 1012

[6] (1799) 8 Term Rep 308

[7] (1841) 9 M &W 54

[8] 1831) 5 C & P 58: 1 Moo & S 51

[9] Whaton’s Law of Lexicon rep. edn. (1976) at p. 877.

[10] AIR 1936 ALL 172

[11] AIR 1921 Oudh 14

[12] AIR 1950 PC 99

[13] 1893 21 Cal 142

[14] AIR 1971 Cal 150

[15] AIR 1974 Raj 4.

[16] (1915) 31 TLR 209

[17] (1988) 1 Andh LT 930

[18] AIR 1987 Kant 236.

[19] N. Purkayastha  v. Union of India, AIR 1953 Assam 33

[20] Nihal Singh  v.  Rambai, AIR 1987 MP 126.

[21] (1903) ILR 30 Cal 539

[22] Law Commission of India 13th Report (contract Act, 1872), 1958

[23] Bankay Behari Prasad  v.  Mahendra Prasad, AIR 1940 Pat. 324

[24] AIR 1928 Lahore 609

[25] AIR 1937 All 610

[26] (1914) 3 KB. 607

[27] 9th Report, Specific Relief Act, (1877), at p. 46: 13th Report, Indian Contract Act, (1872), at p.20.

[1] (2020) 9 SCC 1.

[2] Mrs. Sujata Sharma v. Shri Manu Gupta, (2016) 226 DLT 647.

[3] (2020) 9 SCC 1.

[4] Prakash & Ors. v. Phulavati & Ors. (2016) 2 SCC 36

[5] (2018) 15 SCC 662

[6] (2018) 3 SCC 343.

[7] State of Travancore Cochin & Ors. v. Shanmugha Vilas Cashew Nut Factory & Ors., (1954) SCR 53

[8] Chinthamani Ammal v. Nandgopal Gounder, (2007) 4 SCC 163

[9] Bhagwani v. Mohan Singh AIR 1925 PC 132

[10] Digambar Patil v. Devram, AIR 1995 SC 1728

[1] https://blog.ipleaders.in/an-overview-of-challenges-in-adr-mechanism-in-india/

[2] https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/alternative-dispute-resolution/

[3] https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/problems-and-benefits-using-alternative-dispute-resolution

[4] https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/commercial-law/alternative-methods-of-dispute-resolution-commercial-law-essay.php#:~:text=In%20conclusion%2C%20Alternative%20Dispute%20Resolution,formality%20involved%20and%20less%20adversarial.

[1] 77 Eng. Rep. 638

[2] 5 U.S. 137 (1803). 

[3] https://www.latestlaws.com/articles/doctrine-of-judicial-review-in-india-a-judicial-perspective-by-fayaz-ahmed-bhat#:~:text=The%20Doctrine%20of%20Judicial%20Review,LEd.

[4] Emperor v. Burah, ILR, Calcutta, 63 (1877)

[5] https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-3597-judicial-review.html

[6] AIR 1980 SC 1789

[7] AIR 1965 SC 845

[8] AIR 1967 SC 1643

[9] AIR 19773 SC 1416

[10] AIR 1975 SC 865

[11] AIR 1980 SC 1789

[12] AIR 2007 SC 861

[13] https://blog.ipleaders.in/all-about-judicial-review/#Judicial_review_of_Ordinances

[14] https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/essay/judicial-review-in-india-meaning-features-and-other-details/40369

[1] C.K TAKWANI, LECTURES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 20, (EBC 2019).

[2]  WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT, https://www.worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/ (last visited July 07, 2021)

[3]  KRISHAN KESHAV, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 19 (Singhal Law Publishing 2019).

[4] TRATIVE LAW 19 (Singhal Law Publishing 2019).

[5]  INDIA CONST. art. 21.

[6] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461.

[7] Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Raj Narain AIR 1975 SC 2299

[8]  Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621

[9] BERNARD SCHWARTZ, THE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT 19 (2nd ed., The Macmillan Company, 1963)

[10] Gobitiz 310 U.S. 586, 600 (1940).

[11] United States vs. Tale Todd, 77 U.S. 617, 12 (1794

[12] Hylton vs. United States, 3 U.S. 171, 32 (1796).

[13] Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 12 (1803)

[14]Nicola Laver, The rule of law in the UK, INBRIEF (July 07, 2021), https://www.inbrief.co.uk/legal-system/therule-of

[15] Varsha, Rule of India &UK, LEGAL SERVICE INDIA (July 07, 2021), http://www.legalserviceindia.com/article/l457-Rule-of-Law-in-India-&-UK.html.

[16] R v. Secretary of State for Transport, 2 A.C. 85, 34 (1990).

[17] Les Verts vs. European Parliament, 1 E.C.R 1339 (1986).