ISSN 2581-8503 Double-Blind Peer Review Open Access Monthly Journal Publication Cycle September 2026
Peer-Reviewed · Open Access · Monthly Sep 2026
Research Discovery

Search Publications

Search published legal research by paper title, author, abstract, keywords, DOI, publication year, volume and issue.

Clear Search

Search Results

3,968 publications
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO  GHANA CASE STUDY BY: SRISHTI VARMA
Open Access

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO GHANA CASE STUDY BY: SRISHTI VARMA

Authors: SRISHTI VARMA
Registration ID: 102217 | Published Paper ID: 2217
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 15

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-57827977/HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HU

[1] UNEP & Columbia Law School, Climate Change and Human Rights, UNEP, 1, (2015) [2] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights  [3] INDIA CONST. art. 21 [4] INDIA CONST. art. 21 [5] INDIA CONST. art. 21 [6] Universal Declaration of Human Rights  [7] INDIA CONST. art. 19, § 1, cl. e [8] INDIA CONST. art. 21 [9] Universal Declaration of Human Rights [10] Universal Declaration of Human Rights [11] INDIA CONST. art. 21 [12] Universal Declaration of Human Rights [13] INDIA CONST. art. 300 cl. A [14] United Nations Charter [15] New Patriotic Party vs. Attorney-General S.C.G.L.R. 729 (Sup. Ct. Ghana 1996-97) [16] New Patriotic Party vs. Inspector General of Police [1993-94] 2 G.L.R. 459 (Sup. Ct. Ghana 1993-94) [17] Adjei Ampofo vs. Attorney-General S.C.G.L.R. 676 (Sup. Ct. Ghana 2007-08) [18] SERAC vs. Nigeria (2001) AHRLR 60 (ACHPR 2001) [19] Decision Regarding Communication 155/96 (Social and Economic Rights Action Center/Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria), Case No. ACHPR/COMM/A044/1, para. 52
"UNVEILING CHANGE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR'S - SOCIO-POLITICAL LANDSCAPE BEFORE AND AFTER THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE 370" BY - MOHAMMAD AAWEZ RAJPUT
Open Access

"UNVEILING CHANGE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR'S - SOCIO-POLITICAL LANDSCAPE BEFORE AND AFTER THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE 370" BY - MOHAMMAD AAWEZ RAJPUT

Authors: MOHAMMAD AAWEZ RAJPUT
Registration ID: 102216 | Published Paper ID: 2216
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 26

Doi Link : 

[1] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [2] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [3] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807274 [4] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [5] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [6].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807274 [7] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [8].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807274 [9] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [10] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807274 [11] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [12] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [13] https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ORF-OccasionalPaper-259-Kashmir-Diplomatic.pdf [14] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807274
A CRITICAL STUDY ON EMPOWERING YOUTH AS AGENTS OF PEACE BY - MOHAN KUMAR N.
Open Access

A CRITICAL STUDY ON EMPOWERING YOUTH AS AGENTS OF PEACE BY - MOHAN KUMAR N.

Authors: MOHAN KUMAR N.
Registration ID: 102215 | Published Paper ID: 2215
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 19

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-99774494/A CRITICAL STUDY ON EMPOWERING YOUTH AS AGENTS OF

[1] Dr. S.K. Kapoor, Public International Law, Lucknow, Central Law Agency, 2021) p.100-102. [2] M.P. Tandon, Public International Law, ( Faridabad, Allahabad Law Agency, 2010) p. 320-323. [3] R.C. Hingorani, Modern International Law, (New Delhi, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co, PVT Ltd, 1993) p.398-399. [4] Rupert Maclean- David N. Wilson, International Handbook of Education for the changing world of work, (London, UNEVOC, 2009), p.345-346.
UNRAVELING THE DYNAMICS BETWEEN SECTION 149 & SECTION 34- OFFENCE AND EVIDENCE IN RECENT LEGAL PERSPECTIVES. BY - NANDINI BHAGAT & RIA SINGH
Open Access

UNRAVELING THE DYNAMICS BETWEEN SECTION 149 & SECTION 34- OFFENCE AND EVIDENCE IN RECENT LEGAL PERSPECTIVES. BY - NANDINI BHAGAT & RIA SINGH

Authors: NANDINI BHAGAT & RIA SINGH
Registration ID: 102213 | Published Paper ID: 2213 & 2214
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 22

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-24199358/UNRAVELING THE DYNAMICS BETWEEN SECTION 149 & SECT

[1] Indian Penal Code, 1860, 149, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India). [2] Bhudeo Mandal V. State of Bihar, 1981 AIR 1219 SCR (3) 291. [3] Ram Dhani & Ors. V. State of UP, 1997 CriLJ 2286. [4] Vijay Pandurang Thakre & Ors V. State of Maharashtra AIR 2011 SC 1305. [5] Mohd. Shoaib Ansari & Ors V. State & Anr AIR 2022 SC 862. [6] 72 I.A. 148(P.C.). [7] Barendra Kumar Ghosh V. King Emperor (1925) 27 BOMLR 148. [8] Jaswant Singh v. state of Haryana, AIR 2000 SCR 903. [9] Karnail Singh And Another vs The State of Punjab, AIR 1954 SCR 904. [10] Ram Yadav vs State of Bihar, 1996. [11] Ramaswami Ayyangar v. State of T.N, AIR 1976 SCR 580 SCC (3) 574. [12]Lalji v. State of U.P, AIR 1989 SCR (1) 130 SCC (1) 437. [13] Virendra Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1989 SCR (1) 130 SCC 437. [14] Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor, 1945 47. [15] Mahbub Shah vs Emperor, (Dec. 18, 2023).   [16] Moti Das v. Bihar, AIR 1954 SC 657. [17] UP v. Iftikhar Khan, AIR 1973 SCR 863 SCC 512. [18] Rambilas Singh v. State of Bihar, 1963. [19]ICLR, https://www.iclr.co.uk/knowledge/glossary/mens-rea-and-actus-reus/,(Dec. 18, 2023)    [20] Mohan Singh v State of Punjab, 1970 [21] UP v. Iftikhar Khan, AIR 1973 SCR 863 SCC 512
IS THE RIGHT TO REPAIR MOVEMENT RELEVANT IN INDIA? BY - ABEER SHRIVASTAVA
Open Access

IS THE RIGHT TO REPAIR MOVEMENT RELEVANT IN INDIA? BY - ABEER SHRIVASTAVA

Authors: ABEER SHRIVASTAVA
Registration ID: 102212 | Published Paper ID: 2212
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 13

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-93238985/IS THE RIGHT TO REPAIR MOVEMENT RELEVANT IN INDIA?

[1] Prateek Arora, 'Does India Need a 'Right to Repair' Legislation?' (The Daily Guardian, 13th August) accessed 4 October 2021. [2] Rahil Philipose, 'Explained: What is the ‘right to repair’ movement?' (The Indian Express, 14 July 2021) accessed 4 October 2021. [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] The Hindu Net Desk, 'The Right to Repair Movement' (The Hindu, 4 August 2021) www.thehindu.com/news/international/right-to-repair-movement/article35722520.ece> accessed 4 October 2021. [6] Supra, note 5. [7] Id. [8] Anonymous, 'Should Make in India come with Right to Repair?' (The Times of India, 7 October 2019) accessed 4 October 2021. [9] Jai Vipra, '‘Right to repair’, the legislation India needs to save money, minimize e-waste' (The Federal, 13 March 2021) accessed 4 October 2021. [10] Supra, note 2. [11] Shri Shamsher Kataria v. Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. & Ors., Competition Commission of India, Case No. 03/2011, Date: 27/07/15, < https://www.cci.gov.in/sites/default/files/03201127.pdf > accessed 4 October 2021. 12 [12] Prateek Arora, 'Does India Need a 'Right to Repair' Legislation?' (The Daily Guardian, 13th August) accessed 4 October 2021 [13] Himanshu Arora, '“Right to Repair” vis-à-vis Indian trade mark law: A comparative analysis' [2021] 24(1-2) The Journal of World Intellectual Property   to%20self%2Drepair%20the%20goods> accessed 18 October 2021. [14] Pepsi Co. Inc. v. Hindustan Coca Cola, 2001 PTC 699. [15] Kapil Wadhwa v. Samsung Electronics, 2013 (53) PTC 112 (Del). [16] Supra, note 13. [17] The Trade Marks Act, 1999, Act No. 47 of 1999. [18] Supra, note 14. [19] Supra, note 13. [20] Supra, note 17. [21] Supra, note 13. [22] Id. [23] Id. [24] Anuj Bhatia, 'Explained: What Apple’s decision to allow iPhone repairs means for consumers' (The Indian Express, 19 November 2021)accessed 1 December 2021. [25] Maddie Stone, 'The shareholder fight that forced Apple’s hand on repair rights' (The Verge, 17 November 2021)www.theverge.com/2021/11/17/22787336/apple-right-to-repair-self-service-diy-reason- microsoft>accessed 1 December 2021.
THE ODYSSEY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE WITHIN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK BY - MEHAK REET SODHI
Open Access

THE ODYSSEY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE WITHIN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK BY - MEHAK REET SODHI

Authors: MEHAK REET SODHI
Registration ID: 102210 | Published Paper ID: 2210
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 14

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-33414554/THE ODYSSEY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEPARATION O

[1] Rao, P. Parameshwar. “SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A DEMOCRACY: THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE.” 37 Peace Research, 113-22, (2005), http://www.jstor.org/stable/24469690. [2] Krause, Sharon. “The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” 62 The Review of Politics, 231–65, (2000), http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408037. [3] Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de, 1689-1755. The Spirit of Laws. London. [4] Hansen, Mogens Herman. “THE MIXED CONSTITUTION VERSUS THE SEPARATION OF POWERS: MONARCHICAL AND ARISTOCRATIC ASPECTS OF MODERN DEMOCRACY.” 31 History of Political Thought, 509–31, (2010), http://www.jstor.org/stable/26224146. [5] Bakshi, P. M. “Comparative Law: Separation of Powers in India.” American Bar Association Journal, vol. 42, no. 6, 1956, pp. 553–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25719656. [6] Krishna, Shashank. “Separation of Powers in the Indian Constitution & Why the Supreme Court Was Right in Intervening in the ‘Jharkhand’ Imbroglio.” Student Bar Review, vol. 18, no. 2, 2006, pp. 13–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44306653. [7] Tyagi, Karan. “THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND ITS RELEVANCE IN TIME OF COALITION POLITICS.” The Indian Journal of Political Science, vol. 69, no. 3, 2008, pp. 619–25. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41856450. [8] Moolimani Shamanth Umesh, A Comparative Study of Separation of Powers with India, USA and UK, 5 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2023). [9] Constituent assemble debates (proceedings)- volume VII- Friday, 10th Dec, 1948 [10] Rao, P. Parameshwar. “SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A DEMOCRACY: THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE.” 37 Peace Research, 113-22, (2005), http://www.jstor.org/stable/24469690. [11] Bakshi, P. M. “Comparative Law: Separation of Powers in India.” 42 American Bar Association Journal, 553–95 (1956), http://www.jstor.org/stable/25719656. [12] Syed Umam Fatima Hasan & Mohd Faiz Khan, Separation of Powers, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 2016 (2021). [13] Krishna, Shashank. “Separation of Powers in the Indian Constitution & Why the Supreme Court Was Right in Intervening in the ‘Jharkhand’ Imbroglio.” 18 Student Bar Review, 13-17 (2006), http://www.jstor.org/stable/44306653. [14] India Const. art. 50. [15] India Const. art. 53. [16] India Const. art. 74. [17] India Const. art. 121. [18] India Const. art. 142. [19] Garg, B. L. “Problem of the Separation of Judiciary in India.” 25 The Indian Journal of Political Science, 331–38 (1964), http://www.jstor.org/stable/41854047. [20] Aparna Padmakavi R., Balancing Judicial Interpretation and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers, 4 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2022). [21] Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab,1994 SCC (3) 569. [22] Kesavananda Bharati & ors v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC. [23] IR Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2007 SC 861. [24] Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab (1955) 2 SCR 225. [25] P. Kannadasan v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1975 AIR 865. [26] Golaknath v. State of Punjab, 1967 AIR 1643. [27] Asif Hameed v. State of J&K, AIR 1989 SC 1899. [28] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan & Ors, (1997) 6 SCC 241). [29] Bandhuva Mukti Morch v. Union of India, AIR 1952 SC 332 [30] Constitutional Reforms Act, Section 61, (2005) Government of UK. [31] Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6 as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5, available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html [32] Bakshi, P. M. “Comparative Law: Separation of Powers in India.” 42 American Bar Association Journal, 553–95, (1956) http://www.jstor.org/stable/25719656. [33] The Constitution of United States of America, 1789. [34] Panamma Refining Company v. Ryan 293 US 388 (1935) [35] Marbury v. Madison, 5 USA 137 (1803). [36] Duport Steel Ltd. Sirs and Ors. (1980) 1 WLR 142. [37] Manish Tiwari, “The Supreme Court of India: The Rise of Judicial Power and the Protection of Federalism.” University of Toronto Press, 223-55, (2017), http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt1whm97c.12. [38] Aparna Padmakavi R., Balancing Judicial Interpretation and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers, 4 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2022).
CASE COMMENT ON VASUDHA SETHI V. KIRAN V. BHASKAR [2022 SCC ONLINE SC 43] BY - ANURAG AGARWAL
Open Access

CASE COMMENT ON VASUDHA SETHI V. KIRAN V. BHASKAR [2022 SCC ONLINE SC 43] BY - ANURAG AGARWAL

Authors: ANURAG AGARWAL 
Registration ID: 102209 | Published Paper ID: 2209
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 15

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-23577356/CASE COMMENT ON VASUDHA SETHI V. KIRAN V. BHASKAR

[1] Law Clerk – cum – Research Associate, Supreme Court of India [2] Asha Bajpai, Child Rights in India: Law, Policy, and Practice (Oxford India Paperbacks 2006). [3] James Stewart, The Child Custody Book: How to Protect Your Children and Win Your Case (Impact Publishers 2000). [4] Enakshi Ganguly Thukral, Every Right for Every Child: Governance and Accountability (Routledge India 2011) [5] (2020) 3 SCC 67 [6] (1984) 3 SCC 698  [7] (1987) 1 SCC 42 [8] (2019) 7 SCC 311 [9] (2018) 2 SCC 309 [10] (2017) 8 SCC 454 [11] (2018) 9 SCC 578 [12] (2017) 10 SCC 1
CASE ANALYSIS: RAJENDRA SINGH RANA V. SWAMI PRASAD MAURYA AND OTHERS, (2007) 4 SCC 270 BY - ASTHA BHUMISH SHAH
Open Access

CASE ANALYSIS: RAJENDRA SINGH RANA V. SWAMI PRASAD MAURYA AND OTHERS, (2007) 4 SCC 270 BY - ASTHA BHUMISH SHAH

Authors: ASTHA BHUMISH SHAH
Registration ID: 102208 | Published Paper ID: 2208
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 10

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-12184426/CASE ANALYSIS: RAJENDRA SINGH RANA V. SWAMI PRASAD

[1] Rajendra Singh Rana v. Swami Prasad Maurya and Others, (2007) 4 SCC 270 (India), p. 17. [2] Id. p.4 [3] Id. [4] Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu and Others, (1992) SCR (1) 686 (India). [5] Supra n.1, p.15 [6] Jagjit Singh v. State of Haryana, (2006) 11 SCC 1 (India). [7] Supra n.1, p.19 [8] Ravi S. Naik v. Union of India, (1994) 1 SCR 754.
DIGITAL COPYRIGHT WARS: PROTECTING KNOWLEDGE IN THE AGE OF INFRINGEMENT BY - MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR
Open Access

DIGITAL COPYRIGHT WARS: PROTECTING KNOWLEDGE IN THE AGE OF INFRINGEMENT BY - MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR

Authors: MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR
Registration ID: 102207 | Published Paper ID: 2207
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 14

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2024-99477527/DIGITAL COPYRIGHT WARS: PROTECTING KNOWLEDGE IN TH

[1] Ahmad, T., & Ghosh, I. (2011). Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1839353 [2] Astrachan, J. (2008). De Minimus Copyright Infringement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1625037 [3] Id [4] Carpenter, C. (2012). Copyright Infringement and the Second Generation of Social Media Websites: Why Pinterest Users Should Be Protected from Copyright Infringement by the Fair Use Defense. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2131483 [5] Id [6] Jainemo (P) Ltd. v. Rahul Shah, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6136 [7] The Copyright Act, 1957. Act No. 14 of 19571, Section 2(o), 2(f) [8] Chancellor v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6713 [9] The Copyright Act, 1957. Act No. 14 of 19571, Section 52(1) [10] Neetu Singh v. Telegram FZ LLC, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2637