Search Publications

[1] INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY AND MULTI DISCIPLINARY STUDIES [IJIMS] 2017[2] POLITICAL THEORY – R C AGARWAL[3]CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA – DR J N PANDEY  [4] WORLD CONSTITUTIONS JUNE L DSOUZA[5] INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY AND MULTI DISCIPLINARY STUDIES [IJIMS]2017 VOLUME4[6] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA – DR J N PANDEY[7] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA – DR J N PANDEY   S R BOMMAI V. UNION OF INDIA 1994 AIR 1918[8] POLITICAL THEORY – R C AGARWAL[9] POLITICAL THEORY R C AGARWALINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES [IJIMS] 2017 VOLUME 4

[1]SUSAN MURCOTT (1991), THE FIRST BUDDHIST WOMEN: TRANSLATIONS AND COMMENTARY ON THERIGHATA 4 (PARALLAX PRESS 1991)[2] Mohammad Ahmad Khan v Shah Bano Begum, AIR 1985 SC 945[3] Daniel Latifi & Anr. vs. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 3958[4] BASABI CHAKRABORTY, WOMEN’S STUDIES: VARIOUS ASPECTS 260 -261 (URBEE PRAKASHAN 2014)[5] WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION, https://who.int (last visited Oct.14,2024)[6] THE NBC, https://www.nbcnews.com/ (last visited Oct.14,2024)[7] Mohammad Ahmad Khan v Shah Bano Begum, AIR 1985 SC 945[8] Vishakha v, State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011[9] Santosh Singh v State of Punjab, (2014) 13 SCC 25[10] BAR AND BENCH, https://www.barandbench.com/ (last visited Oct.14,2024)[11] Parvati Sharma, “Identity of a writer” The Indian Express, Sep.21,2024[12] UN WOMEN. https://www.unwomen.org/ (last visited Oct.15,2024)[13] Narsi Benwal, “Bombay High Court voices concern over rise in trend of women misusing Domestic Violence Act.”, The Bar and Bench (Aug.1,2023 9:29 P.M.) https://www.barandbench.com/news/bombay-high-court-concern-rise-trend-women-misusing-domestic-violence-act[14] Unreported Judgements, 4339 OF 2019, decided on 17 February,2020 (Madras HC)[15] Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273[16] THE TIMES OF INDIA, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ (last visited Oct.15,2024)

[1] The Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S. 10.[2] Syed Mohammad Raza and Ors. v. Abbas Bandi Bibi, 1932 S.C.C. OnLine PC 23.[3] Mohammad Raza and Ors. v. Abbas Bandi Bibi, M.A.N.U./P.R/0015/1932.[4] Raghunath Prasad Singh v. Deputy Commissioner,1929 S.C.C. OnLine PC 283.[5] Supra note 3.[6] Supra note 4.[7] Oudh Laws Act, 1876, S.3.[8] Supra note 1.[9] In re Macleay 1875,(1875) 20 Eq. 186.[10] Gill v. Pearson, (1805) 6 East 173.[11] Waghela Rajsanji v. Shekh Masludin, 56 I.A. 372: 30 LW 619 (P.C.).[12] Rakshit Agarwal, Re-Examining the Interpretation of Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, SCC OnLine (December 23, 2022).[13] Gayasi Ram v Shahabuddin AIR 1935 All 493.[14] K. Muniswamy v. K. Venkataswamy, AIR 2001 Kant. 246.[15] CanBank Financial Services Ltd. V. The Custodian And. Ors, 2004, Supp. 4 S.C.R. 60.[16] Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. V. District Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Urban) (2005) 5 SCC 632 .[17] Debi Dayal v. Ghasita, 1929 SCC OnLine All 409.