Search Publications

[1] Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation, AIR 1994 SC 988 (India).

[2] Findlay v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, (1984) AC 318 (India).

[3] P.T.R Exports (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 3461 (India).

[4] Schmidt v. Secretary of State for Home Affairs, (1969) 1 ALL ER 904.

[5] Attorney General for Hong Kong v. Ng Yuen Shin, (1983) 2 All ER 346.

[6] LEWIS, CLIVE, Judicial remedies in public law, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.

[7] R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ruddock, (1987) 1 WLR 1482.

[8] R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khan, [1985] 1 All ER 40.

[9] TREVOR ZEYL, Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law, 49 ALTA. L. REV. 203 (2011).

[10] R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hargreaves, [1997] 1 WLR 906.

[11] Kioa v. West, (1985) 159 CLR 583.

[12] R v. Secretary of State for Health, ex parte United States tobacco, (1992) QB 353.

[13] State of Kerala v. K.G. Madhavan Pillai, AIR 1989 SC 49 (India).

[14] IP MASSEY, Administrative Law (9th ed., 2005).

[15] Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation, (1993) 3 SCC 499 (India).

[16] Food Corporation of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, (1993) 1 SCC 71 (India).

[17] Navjyoti Corporation Group Housing Society v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 155 (India).

[18] Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation, AIR 1990 SC 1031 (India).

[19] Suseela v. University Grants Commission, (2015) 8 SCC 129 (India).

[20] Madras City Wine Merchants Association v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 5 SCC 509 (India).

[21] Bajaj Hindustan Limited v. Sir Shadi Lal Enterprise Private Limited, (2011) 1 SCC 640 (India).

[22] State of Haryana v. Jagdish, (2010) 4 SCC 216.

[23] Perry v. Sindermann, [1972] 408 U.S. 593.

[24] Shaball v. State Compensation Ins. Auth., 799 P.2d 399.

[25] JAYANTA CHAKRABORTY, Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation - A Comparative Study of UK, USA & India, 5 INDIAN J.L. & PUB. POL'y 21 (2018).

[26] CAROL HARLOW, Fault Liability in French and English Public Law, The Modern Law Review, 516-541, (1976).

[27] CHESTER BROWN, The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a 'General Principle of Law': Some

Preliminary Thoughts, Transnational Dispute Management (2009).

[28] JOE TOMLINSON, Do we need a theory of legitimate expectations? Legal Studies, 286-300 (2020).

[29] MARTA VICENTE, Property Rights and Legitimate Expectations Under United States Constitutional Law and The European Convention on Human Rights: Abstract Some Comparative Remarks (2022).

[30] Entreprise Transports Freymuth TA Strasbourg, [1995] PL 657.

[31] REBECCA WILLIAMS, Unjust Enrichment and Public Law: A Comparative Study of England, France and the EU, Oxford Hart Publishing (2010).

[32] ALEXANDER BROWN, Justifying Compensation for Frustrated Legitimate Expectations, Law and PHILOSOPHY, 30, 699–728 (2011).

[i]  “ C o p y r i g h t i n G e n e r a l ” (Copyright) < h t t p s : / / www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html> accessed November 19, 2020

[ii] “Trademark Basics” (United States Patent and Trademark Office - An Agency of the Department of CommerceSeptember 25, 2020) accessed November 19, 2020

[iii] National Comics Publications, Inc v Fawcett Publications, Inc et al, 191 F2d 594 (2d Cir 1951) (US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit )

[iv] Lee N, “How a $4 Million Lawsuit Created 'Shazam!' and 'Captain Marvel' as We Know Them Today” (Business InsiderApril 5, 2019) accessed November 19, 2020.

[v] Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt Ltd. v. RGV Productions Pvt. Ltd [2015] [CS (OS) 1892/2006]

[vi] Arbaaz Khan v. Northstar Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (Suit (L) No. 301 of 2016)

[1] “Jyh-An Lee & Reto Hilry & Kung- Chung Liu, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press (1st ed. 2021).”

[2] Raquel Acosta, Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Rights, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 2012. Available at: https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/artificial-intelligence-and-authorship-rights.

[3] “Joel Feldman, The art of artificial intelligence: a recent copyright law development, Attorney Analysis from Westlaw Today, a part of Thomson Reuters (2022), available at https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/art- artificial-intelligence-recent-copyright-law-development-2022-04-22/"

[4] “Shabbi S. Khan, Nikhil T. Pradhan, How to Overcome the Two Biggest Challenges of Patenting AI Technologies, Foley and Lardner LLP publications (2020), available at https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2020/02/how-overcome-challenges-patenting-ai-technologies/"

[5] “Jaliz Maldonado, Legal Ethics: The Ethical Dilemma of Artificial Intelligence, The National Law Review, Volume XIV, Number 50 (2024), available at https://www.natlawreview.com/article/legal-ethics-ethical- dilemma-artificial-intelligence"

[6] “John McCarthy, Basic Questions, What isArtificial Intelligence?, Stanford University, available at http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/index.html"

[7] “Himadri Pandya, Grishma Nair, Technical Advance and Economic Significance of Artificial Intelligence, IPR NEWSLETTER "Intellectual property isthe fuel that drives innovation & creativity... protect it fiercely." April - May, 2023, available at https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/Images/pdf/Final_CG_News_Letter_.pdf"

[8] “Raquel Acosta, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Rights', [ February, 2012] , Harvard Journal of Law and Technology , available at https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/artificial-intelligence-and-authorship-rights.”

[9] Supra note 2

[10] Supra note 2

[11] “M.C. Nwadiugwu, 'Neural Network, Artificial Intelligence and the Computational Brain', [2015], 3, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281374291"

[12] “Gil Appel, Juliana Neelbauer, and David A. Schweidel, Generative AI Has an Intellectual Property Problem, Harvard Business Review, 2023, available at https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property- problem”

[13] “Stephen Thaler v. Shira Perlmu er, Register of Copyrights and Director of the United States Copyright Office, et al. Civil Ac on No. 22-1564 (BAH).”

[14] Supra note 4

[15] “Copyright and Artificial Intelligence U.S. Copyright Office, https://copyright.gov/ai/”

[16] “Copyright Office Issues Notice of Inquiry on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Issue No. 1017 - August 30, 2023, U.S. Copyright Office, available at https://copyright.gov/newsnet/2023/1017.html"

[17] “Copyright Office Launches New Artificial Intelligence Initiative, Issue No. 1004 - March 16, 2023, U.S. Copyright Office, available at https://copyright.gov/newsnet/2023/1004.html"

[18] “avid De Cremer, Nicola Morini Bianzino, and Ben Falk, How Generative AI Could Disrupt Creative Work, Harvard Business Review, 2023, available at https://hbr.org/2023/04/how-generative-ai-could-disrupt-creative- work."

[19] “Burrow Gilles Lithographic v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884).”

[20] “Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239 (1903).”

[21] “Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc., 191 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1951).”

[22] “Navigators Logistics Ltd. vs Kashif Qureshi & Ors, AIRONLINE 2018 DEL 1483”

[23] “Katarina Foss-Solbrekk, Three routes to protecting AI systems and their algorithms under IP law: The good, the bad and the ugly, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 16, Issue 3, 2021, Pages 247– 258, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab033."

[24] Supra note 5

[25] “Ahmed Elmallah, Artificial Intelligence Patenting: Top Challenges and Key Considerations, Bennet Jones Blogs, 2022, available at https://www.bennettjones.com/Blogs-Section/Artificial-Intelligence-Patenting-Top- Challenges-and-Key-Considerations.”

[26] “Liz Gray, Patenting the AI pipeline: intellectual property for AI before standardisation, I AM Innovation & Invention Yearbook, 2022, available at https://www.iam-media.com/global-guide/innovation-invention- yearbook/2022/article/patenting-the-ai-pipeline-intellectual-property-ai- standardisation#:~:text=AI%20standardisation%20of%20some%20form,with%20a%20specific%20technical%2 0standard.”

[27] “Rob Srebrovic, Jay Yonamine, How AI, and specifically BERT, helps the patent industry, Google Cloud Blog, 2020, available at https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/how-ai-improves-patent- analysis.”

[28] “Douglas R. Nemec, Laura M. Rann, AI and Patent Law: Balancing Innovation and Inventorship, Skedden publications, 2023, available at https://www.skadden.com/-/media/files/publications/2023/04/quarterly- insights/ai_and_patent_law_balancing_innovation_and_inventorship.pdf?rev=4bf3d044b5244043961e0ae9bf7c 34eb#:~:text=The%20issue%20of%20inventorship%20in,competitive%20edge%20in%20the%20marketplace.”

[29] Supra note 28

[1] Student; Saveetha School Of Law; Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Sciences(SIMATS);Chennai 600077;Email id:divyasenthil2404@gmail.com