[1] Rao, P. Parameshwar. “SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A DEMOCRACY: THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE.” 37 Peace Research, 113-22, (2005), http://www.jstor.org/stable/24469690.

[2] Krause, Sharon. “The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” 62 The Review of Politics, 231–65, (2000), http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408037.

[3] Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de, 1689-1755. The Spirit of Laws. London.

[4] Hansen, Mogens Herman. “THE MIXED CONSTITUTION VERSUS THE SEPARATION OF POWERS: MONARCHICAL AND ARISTOCRATIC ASPECTS OF MODERN DEMOCRACY.” 31 History of Political Thought, 509–31, (2010), http://www.jstor.org/stable/26224146.

[5] Bakshi, P. M. “Comparative Law: Separation of Powers in India.” American Bar Association Journal, vol. 42, no. 6, 1956, pp. 553–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25719656.

[6] Krishna, Shashank. “Separation of Powers in the Indian Constitution & Why the Supreme Court Was Right in Intervening in the ‘Jharkhand’ Imbroglio.” Student Bar Review, vol. 18, no. 2, 2006, pp. 13–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44306653.

[7] Tyagi, Karan. “THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND ITS RELEVANCE IN TIME OF COALITION POLITICS.” The Indian Journal of Political Science, vol. 69, no. 3, 2008, pp. 619–25. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41856450.

[8] Moolimani Shamanth Umesh, A Comparative Study of Separation of Powers with India, USA and UK, 5 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2023).

[9] Constituent assemble debates (proceedings)- volume VII- Friday, 10th Dec, 1948

[10] Rao, P. Parameshwar. “SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A DEMOCRACY: THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE.” 37 Peace Research, 113-22, (2005), http://www.jstor.org/stable/24469690.

[11] Bakshi, P. M. “Comparative Law: Separation of Powers in India.” 42 American Bar Association Journal, 553–95 (1956), http://www.jstor.org/stable/25719656.

[12] Syed Umam Fatima Hasan & Mohd Faiz Khan, Separation of Powers, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 2016 (2021).

[13] Krishna, Shashank. “Separation of Powers in the Indian Constitution & Why the Supreme Court Was Right in Intervening in the ‘Jharkhand’ Imbroglio.” 18 Student Bar Review, 13-17 (2006), http://www.jstor.org/stable/44306653.

[14] India Const. art. 50.

[15] India Const. art. 53.

[16] India Const. art. 74.

[17] India Const. art. 121.

[18] India Const. art. 142.

[19] Garg, B. L. “Problem of the Separation of Judiciary in India.” 25 The Indian Journal of Political Science, 331–38 (1964), http://www.jstor.org/stable/41854047.

[20] Aparna Padmakavi R., Balancing Judicial Interpretation and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers, 4 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2022).

[21] Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab,1994 SCC (3) 569.

[22] Kesavananda Bharati & ors v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC.

[23] IR Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2007 SC 861.

[24] Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab (1955) 2 SCR 225.

[25] P. Kannadasan v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1975 AIR 865.

[26] Golaknath v. State of Punjab, 1967 AIR 1643.

[27] Asif Hameed v. State of J&K, AIR 1989 SC 1899.

[28] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan & Ors, (1997) 6 SCC 241).

[29] Bandhuva Mukti Morch v. Union of India, AIR 1952 SC 332

[30] Constitutional Reforms Act, Section 61, (2005) Government of UK.

[31] Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6 as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5, available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html

[32] Bakshi, P. M. “Comparative Law: Separation of Powers in India.” 42 American Bar Association Journal, 553–95, (1956) http://www.jstor.org/stable/25719656.

[33] The Constitution of United States of America, 1789.

[34] Panamma Refining Company v. Ryan 293 US 388 (1935)

[35] Marbury v. Madison, 5 USA 137 (1803).

[36] Duport Steel Ltd. Sirs and Ors. (1980) 1 WLR 142.

[37] Manish Tiwari, “The Supreme Court of India: The Rise of Judicial Power and the Protection of Federalism.” University of Toronto Press, 223-55, (2017), http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt1whm97c.12.

[38] Aparna Padmakavi R., Balancing Judicial Interpretation and the Doctrine of Separation of Powers, 4 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2022).