Open Access Research Article
White Black Legal – International Law Journal · ISSN 2581-8503
TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE E-WASTE MANAGEMENT IN INDIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE
Read the Full Research Paper
Access the complete open-access article in PDF format. No login is required.
Abstract
TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE E-WASTE MANAGEMENT IN INDIA: CHALLENGES
AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE
AUTHORED
BY - DR. SEJAL RUSHI, Assistant Professor
and
CO-AUTHOR
- DR. NIRGUN RUSHI, Assistant Professor
Parul
Institute of Law,
Parul
University
Abstract
The rapid growth of the electronics sector has made electronic
waste (e-waste) one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally, and India
faces serious challenges in ensuring its environmentally sound management. This
article examines the issues and challenges posed by e-waste in India, including
the environmental and public-health hazards of improper disposal and recycling,
and analyses the legal and regulatory framework governing e-waste —
specifically the E-Waste Rules of 2011, 2016, and 2022, and the Battery Waste
Management Rules, 2022, which now regulate end-of-life lithium-ion batteries
from electric vehicles. It critically evaluates the Extended Producer
Responsibility regime, whose implementation has been constrained by
infrastructural gaps, the dominance of the informal sector, and illegal trade,
and assesses the enforcement roles of the Central and State Pollution Control
Boards and the National Green Tribunal. The article identifies opportunities
for sustainable e-waste management — including circular-economy integration and
formalisation of informal recyclers — while cautioning that urban mining must
be evaluated through life cycle assessment. It concludes that the e-waste
challenge can be converted into an opportunity for environmental sustainability
and resource conservation only through effective implementation, accountable
enforcement, and LCA-informed policy.
Keywords: E-Waste; E-Waste
Management; Extended Producer Responsibility; Lithium-ion Batteries; National
Green Tribunal; Life Cycle Assessment.
Introduction
E-waste is one of the rapidly proliferating waste streams
globally, adversely affecting the environment and posing health and ecological
hazards (Ghulam & Abushammala, 2023) . Every electronic product has a stipulated life; millions
of electronic devices are discarded every year as products break or become
obsolete. Once any electronic product reaches the end of its useful life, it
becomes e-waste (Canavati, Toweh, Simon, & Arbic, 2022, p. 100435) .
Rapid technological advancement in the electrical and electronic
sector, combined with the reduced lifespan of equipment (Santhanam, Samuel, & Chidambaram, 2014, p. 36) and increased consumption, has generated large quantities
of e-waste in a short period. However, the infrastructure and processes to
manage this waste have not developed at the same pace: India produced 1.6
million tonnes of e-waste in fiscal 2021–22, ranking third in the world, yet
only about half a million tonnes (0.5 million tonnes) was gathered and treated
(M. B., & -, R. N. 2024). Estimates suggest that
India will generate over 161 million tonnes of e-waste by 2050 (Sengupta, Ilankoon, Kang, & Chong, 2022) . In this regard, urban mining of materials through
recycling holds significant economic value and offers employment opportunities;
for example, mobile phone printed circuit boards contain precious metals such
as gold in far higher concentrations than primary ores (Gómez, Grimes, Qian, Feng, & Fowler, 2023) .
Discarded devices threaten health and the environment if not
disposed of and recycled appropriately, owing to the toxic elements and
pollutants they contain, which can leach into soil and water or be emitted into
the air (Ghulam & Abushammala, 2023) . Under the E-Waste Rules, 2022, which came into effect on
1 April 2023 and introduced a new EPR system for recycling e-waste (M.
B., & -, R. N. 2024), the definition of e-waste
spans the electrical and electronic equipment listed in Schedule I of the Rules
— including information technology and telecommunication devices, consumer
electrical products, lamps, and medical equipment. More broadly, electronic
waste includes a wide range of discarded electrical and electronic equipment
that has reached the end of its useful life (Perkins, Drisse, Nxele, & Sly, 2014, p. 286) , ranging from household appliances such as refrigerators,
washing machines, and air conditioners to ICT equipment such as computers,
laptops, printers, and mobile phones, as well as consumer electronics, lighting
equipment, electrical tools, and medical devices (Wath, Dutt, & Chakrabarti, E-waste scenario in India, its management
and implications, 2010, p. 249) . The diversity and increasing volume of these products
make their collection, recycling, and environmentally sound disposal a
significant challenge for regulatory authorities and stakeholders (Perkins, Drisse, Nxele, & Sly, 2014, p. 286) .
Globally, rules and regulations govern the import and export of
waste, yet policy frameworks intended to protect populations from inappropriate
e-waste recycling exist but are not effectively applied (Perkins, Drisse, Nxele, & Sly, 2014, p. 286) . One reason for the limited response is that the
electronics industry is regarded as the engine of communications and economic
growth; devices are intentionally designed with short working lifetimes to
sustain demand for the "next big thing" (Canavati, Toweh, Simon, & Arbic, 2022, p. 100435) .
Legal and Regulatory Framework for E-Waste
Management
Globally, mounting e-waste piles have forced many countries to
draft laws and regulations for effective implementation and sustainable e-waste
management. The journey of e-waste regulation in India began with the
notification of the E-Waste Rules, 2011, by the Ministry of Environment, Forest
and Climate Change (Singh, Dasgupta, & Routroy, 2021, p. 10590) . These rules were the first of their kind in South Asia
and aimed to provide a structured approach to e-waste management.
India has developed a comprehensive legal framework for regulating
electronic waste with the objective of ensuring environmentally sound
collection, recycling, and disposal of discarded equipment. The principal
legislation governing environmental protection in India is the Environment Act,
1986, enacted in the aftermath of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy (Manomaivibool, Extended producer responsibility in a non-OECD context:
The management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in India, 2008, p.
173) . The Act empowers the Central Government to take measures
for protecting and improving environmental quality and serves as the parent
legislation for various waste management rules, including those relating to
electronic waste.
The E-Waste Rules, 2011, which came into force in 2012,
constituted the first dedicated regulatory framework for e-waste management in
the country, imposing responsibilities on producers, consumers, collection
centres, dismantlers, and recyclers. Owing to implementation challenges, they
were replaced by the E-Waste Rules, 2016, which expanded the scope of covered
products, introduced staged collection targets (rising from 30% in the first
two years to 70% from the seventh year), and formally incorporated the concept
of Extended Producer Responsibility (Rizvee, 2020, p. 292) . Subsequently, the Government notified the E-Waste Rules,
2022, effective 1 April 2023, marking the beginning of a new EPR system for
recycling e-waste, with digitised compliance mechanisms, online registration of
manufacturers, producers, refurbishers, and recyclers, and generation of EPR
certificates by authorised recyclers (M. B., & -, R. N. 2024)
A significant feature of India's e-waste regulatory regime is EPR,
under which producers must ensure the collection, recycling, and
environmentally sound management of products after the end of their useful
life, thereby shifting responsibility from consumers and local authorities to
producers and promoting resource efficiency and the circular economy (Herat, 2021, p. 49) .
Implementation and monitoring are entrusted primarily to the Central Pollution
Control Board and State Pollution Control Boards, which are responsible for
registration, authorisation, monitoring, and random inspections, and together
constitute the backbone of India's regulatory framework for sustainable e-waste
management (Singh, Dasgupta, & Routroy, 2021, p. 10591) .
Extending the framework: end-of-life lithium-ion batteries
and the Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022
India's green governance strategy now extends producer
responsibility beyond conventional e-waste to the batteries powering its
electric mobility transition. End-of-life lithium-ion batteries from electric
vehicles pose critical risks to ecosystems through toxic heavy metals and
improper disposal, and their regulation intersects environmental law,
biodiversity risk, and circular-economy policy (Rakshit, et al., 2025) . The Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022, mandate EPR for
battery manufacturers, aim for a minimum of 90% material recovery by 2027, and
require 5% recycled content in new batteries by 2027, rising to 20% by 2030–31 (Sathyan, Pandi, Deepa, & Sulthan, 2024, p. 84) . The scale of the challenge is substantial: projections
estimate annual end-of-life battery waste of 37–80 GWh by 2030, growing
sevenfold by 2040 and tenfold by 2050, even as recovered materials could supply
28–43% of India's critical battery material needs between 2030 and 2050 (Bhattacharya, Nair, Ali, Verma, & Singh, 2025) . Yet formal recycling remains embryonic — under 5% of
end-of-life batteries are formally recycled, while nearly 90% are processed
informally through hazardous methods, amid enforcement lapses in EPR and
infrastructural voids (Mehta, 2025) . Battery recycling nonetheless represents a market
estimated at $3.5 billion, with recovered materials offering cost savings of up
to 40% (Mehta, 2025) ; realising this potential depends on formal–informal
integration, digital tracking mechanisms, and return-based incentives (Mehta, 2025; Jayaraman, 2024) .
Challenges in Effective E-Waste Management
Despite a comprehensive regulatory framework, India faces
persistent challenges in e-waste management. One of the most noteworthy is the
informal recycling sector, which processes e-waste through rudimentary and
uncontrolled methods — such as open burning of cables and acid-bath treatment
of waste — endangering environmental quality and public health (Manomaivibool, Extended producer responsibility in a non-OECD context:
The management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in India, 2008, p.
147) . Lack of awareness among consumers regarding proper
disposal practices often results in e-waste being discarded along with
municipal waste, while implementation has been hindered by weak enforcement and
inadequate compliance monitoring. The country also suffers from insufficient
collection centres and limited formal recycling infrastructure, and from the
illegal import of hazardous electronic waste contrary to national regulations
and international obligations under the Basel Convention (Jeyaraj, 2021, p. 212) .
The implementation record of Extended Producer
Responsibility
EPR has been celebrated as the centrepiece of India's e-waste
regime, yet its implementation record qualifies this optimism. Formal recycling
processes account for less than half of total e-waste management in India, and
studies document persistent compliance gaps (Newar & Deka, 2025) . Two structural obstacles undermine the EPR mechanism from
the outset: large grey markets for electronic products, and illegal imports of
WEEE, which sustain an informal sector that competes directly with the formal
recycling chain (Manomaivibool, Lindhqvist, & Tojo, Extended Producer Responsibility
in a non-OECD Context: The management of waste electrical and electronic
equipment in India, 2007) . Consumer
behaviour compounds the difficulty — because Indian consumers expect monetary
returns when disposing of e-waste, the EPR model as practised in developed
economies is prone to failure in the country (Borthakur & Govind, How well are we managing E-waste in India:
evidences from the city of Bangalore, 2017, p. 226) . The informal sector's robust collection logistics further
complicate the achievement of EPR goals, and partially dismantled products
frequently end up landfilled (George & Cekuls, 2024, p. 301) . Infrastructural hurdles — limited collection centres, the
high cost of advanced recycling technology, and a formal sector that largely
performs only pre-processing before exporting precious-metal-bearing fractions
for smelting abroad (Jeyaraj, 2021, p. 212) — mean that EPR targets cannot be met through registration
and certificate generation alone.
Opportunities for Sustainable E-Waste Management
The growing volume of e-waste, although posing significant
environmental and regulatory challenges, also presents considerable
opportunities for sustainable development. Sustainable e-waste management not
only facilitates environmental protection but also contributes to resource
efficiency, employment generation, and the development of a circular economy.
One of the most promising opportunities lies in the circular
economy model, which emphasises reducing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing, and
recycling electronic products. Electronic waste contains precious metals such
as gold, silver, copper, palladium, and rare earth elements that can be
extracted and reintroduced into the production cycle (Vidyadhar, 2016, p. 30) . Efficient resource recovery reduces dependence on virgin
raw materials, conserves natural resources, and minimises environmental
degradation associated with mining (Zeng, Mathews, & Li, 2018) . A further opportunity lies in the formalisation of the
recycling sector: integrating informal workers into the formal system through
training, licensing, and institutional support can improve recycling efficiency
while ensuring occupational safety and social security, and would facilitate
better compliance with the EPR framework (Manomaivibool, Extended producer responsibility in a non-OECD context:
The management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in India, 2008, p.
147) .
Sustainable e-waste management also offers substantial economic
and employment opportunities, since recycling businesses provide employment to
urban low-skilled workers (Borthakur & Govind, Management of the challenges of electronic waste
in India: an analysis, 2018) . Organised collection centres, dismantling facilities,
refurbishing units, and recycling plants can generate green jobs; refurbishment
and repair can extend the useful life of products and promote affordable access
to technology. Technological innovations have further expanded the
possibilities for effective management: modern recycling technologies enable
the safe extraction of valuable metals, and urban mining has gained prominence
as a sustainable alternative to conventional mining (Shahabuddin, et al., 2022, p. 4518) . Advances in artificial intelligence, automation, and
digital tracking can improve the efficiency and transparency of collection and
processing. Public–private partnerships — such as collaborative models
involving households, corporate funders, NGOs, and civic authorities — can
mobilise investment in infrastructure and awareness (Bhat & Patil, 2021, p. 62114) , while active consumer participation through take-back
programmes, recycling initiatives, and responsible consumption is essential to
the success of the EPR regime (Islam, et al., 2021, p. 128298) .
Urban mining under a life cycle assessment lens
The sustainability claims of urban mining, however, must be
subjected to life cycle assessment rather than assumed. Recycling processes are
themselves energy- and chemical-intensive: life cycle assessments of formal
printed wiring board recycling chains identify metal leaching in the refining
stage as the critical process posing most of the environmental impact, with
global warming potential the most significant impact category, and show that
variations in the power source and chemical reagent consumption most strongly
influence environmental performance (Xue, Kendall, Xu, & Schoenung, 2014) . Hydrometallurgical treatment of e-waste — the dominant
route for recovering precious metals — has accordingly been evaluated through
ISO 14040/14044-compliant, cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment to quantify its
environmental burdens (Zubiani, et al., 2016, p. 1210) . Comparative tools such as ESCAPE, which measure carbon
footprint and embodied energy, have been developed to benchmark emerging
recovery technologies against primary production before they are scaled (Francini, et al., 2025) . The policy implication is not that urban mining should be
abandoned — recycling demonstrably saves primary resources, with desktop and
laptop recycling consuming 80% and 87% less natural resources respectively than
landfilling (Eygen, Meester, Tran, & Dewulf, 2016) — but that its environmental benefit is conditional on
process design, energy mix, and reagent chemistry (Xue, Kendall, Xu, & Schoenung, 2014) . LCA-informed technology standards should therefore
complement EPR targets so that recovery grows in environmental performance as
well as in volume.
Thus, the transition towards sustainable e-waste management in
India should not be viewed merely as a regulatory necessity but as an
opportunity to promote resource efficiency, economic growth, environmental
protection, and social inclusion (Nigam, 2026) .
Judicial Perspective and Environmental Principles
The Indian judiciary has played a pivotal role in the evolution of
environmental jurisprudence by incorporating internationally recognised
environmental principles into domestic law (Nisha, 2025) . Through judicial activism, the Supreme Court has
interpreted Article 21 of the Constitution to include the right to a clean and
healthy environment and has consistently emphasised the importance of
sustainable development and environmental protection.
(i) Vellore Citizens' Welfare
Forum v. Union of India
This landmark case arose from
the environmental degradation caused by tanneries in Tamil Nadu, which
discharged untreated effluents into agricultural lands and water bodies,
thereby affecting public health and the livelihood of local communities. The
Supreme Court recognized that environmental protection and economic development
are not mutually exclusive and adopted the concept of Sustainable Development
as an integral part of Indian environmental law. The Court also expressly
incorporated the Precautionary Principle and the Polluter Pays Principle into
Indian jurisprudence, holding that industries causing environmental harm are
liable to compensate affected persons and bear the cost of restoring ecological
balance. The judgment significantly strengthened environmental governance and
established the principle that developmental activities must be pursued in a
manner consistent with environmental sustainability.
(ii) Indian Council for
Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India
In this case, several chemical
industries in Rajasthan had discharged toxic sludge and untreated waste,
causing severe contamination of soil and groundwater in surrounding villages.
The Supreme Court held the polluting industries absolutely liable for the
environmental damage caused by their activities. The Court emphasized the
Polluter Pays Principle, stating that the responsibility for remedying
environmental degradation rests upon those who create the pollution. The
industries were directed to bear the expenses incurred in cleaning the
contaminated area and compensating affected persons. This judgment reinforced
the accountability of industries and established that environmental costs
cannot be shifted to society at large.
(iii) Research Foundation for
Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy v. Union of India
This case concerned the import
of hazardous waste into India and the improper disposal of toxic materials,
raising concerns regarding compliance with international environmental
obligations. The Supreme Court examined India's commitments under the Basel Convention
on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their
Disposal and emphasized the need for strict regulation of hazardous waste
imports. The Court directed the authorities to establish appropriate mechanisms
for monitoring, treatment, and environmentally sound disposal of hazardous
waste. The decision underscored the importance of preventive environmental
measures and strengthened the regulatory framework governing hazardous and
electronic waste management in India.
These judicial pronouncements
have significantly contributed to the development of Indian environmental
jurisprudence by reinforcing the principles of sustainable development,
precaution, and polluter responsibility. Although these cases primarily dealt with
industrial and hazardous waste, the principles laid down therein are equally
relevant to the contemporary challenges posed by electronic waste management
and provide a strong legal foundation for promoting environmentally sound and
sustainable disposal practices.
(iv) The National Green
Tribunal and day-to-day enforcement
Beyond the Supreme Court's constitutional jurisprudence,
day-to-day enforcement of environmental standards in India is driven by the
National Green Tribunal, established in 2010 as the world's third specialised
environmental court (Biju, 2025) . The Tribunal has transformed India's environmental
adjudication landscape through expeditious case disposal, innovative
application of the precautionary and polluter-pays principles, and enhanced
access to environmental justice, while its efficacy remains constrained by
structural limitations including enforcement challenges, jurisdictional
ambiguities, and resource constraints (Biju, 2025) . Its significance for e-waste governance lies in its
continuous, order-by-order supervision of regulatory authorities — Tribunal
rulings on pollution and illegal disposal direct compliance, compensation, and
remediation. Analyses of India's regulatory processes, however, caution that
enforcement mechanisms themselves can create impediments to accountability,
underscoring that judicial supervision cannot substitute for administrative
enforcement capacity (Shery, 2025) . Even as the Tribunal's contribution is recognised,
enforcement gaps, delays, and accessibility issues continue to limit its
effectiveness (Nisha, 2025) . Strengthening the NGT — through specialised benches,
monitoring of compliance with its orders, and clearer jurisdictional boundaries
— is therefore as important to sustainable e-waste management as the substance
of the rules themselves (Biju, 2025) .
Recommendations and Conclusion
The growing challenge of e-waste and end-of-life battery waste in
India necessitates a comprehensive and sustainable approach that balances
technological advancement with environmental protection. Although India has
established a robust legal framework through the E-Waste Rules, 2022, and the
Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022, effective implementation remains the key
to environmentally sound waste management. EPR should be strengthened through
stricter compliance measures, improved traceability, and greater accountability
of producers, while recognising that EPR alone cannot neutralise grey markets,
illegal imports, or informal-sector competition (Manomaivibool, Lindhqvist, & Tojo, Extended Producer Responsibility
in a non-OECD Context: The management of waste electrical and electronic
equipment in India, 2007) . Since a
substantial portion of e-waste and end-of-life batteries is processed by the
informal sector (Mehta, 2025) , efforts should be made to integrate informal workers into
the formal recycling framework through training, financial support, and
institutional recognition. For batteries specifically, policy should prioritise
second-life applications, minimum recycled-content mandates, and digital
traceability from sale to recycling, in line with the recovery targets of the
2022 Rules (Sathyan, Pandi, Deepa, & Sulthan, 2024;
Bhattacharya, Nair, Ali, Verma, & Singh, 2025, p. 84) .
Enhancing public awareness and promoting consumer responsibility
are essential for proper segregation and disposal (Islam, et al., 2021, p. 128334) ; awareness campaigns, take-back programmes, and
educational initiatives can encourage responsible consumption (Jabbour, Colasante, D’Adamo, Rosa, & Sassanelli, 2023, p. 139263) . Regulatory authorities should strengthen monitoring and
enforcement to prevent illegal disposal and non-compliance (Wath, Vaidya, Dutt, & Chakrabarti, 2010, p. 26) . Investment in collection centres, recycling
infrastructure, and technological innovation would further enhance efficiency (Newar & Deka, 2025) , and LCA-based technology standards should guide such
investment so that recovery processes themselves become environmentally sound (Xue, Kendall, Xu, & Schoenung, 2014) . The National Green Tribunal's supervisory role should be
supported through effective compliance monitoring of its orders (Biju, 2025) . Promoting a culture of repair, reuse, refurbishment, and
recycling, in accordance with circular-economy principles, can significantly
reduce pressure on natural resources (Islam, et al., 2021, p. 128298) .
In conclusion, sustainable e-waste management is not merely an
environmental necessity but an essential component of responsible governance
and sustainable development. As India continues to experience rapid
technological growth and digital transformation — including the electrification
of mobility — it is imperative that economic progress does not come at the cost
of ecological balance and public health. A collaborative approach involving the
government, producers, recyclers, consumers, and civil society is indispensable
for transforming the growing e-waste and battery-waste challenge into an
opportunity for resource conservation, green employment, and sustainable
development.
References
iii.
Bhattacharya, P., Nair, K., Ali, S., Verma, R., &
Singh, A. (2025). Projection of end-of-life
electric vehicle batteries in India considering net-zero targets: a step
towards circularity. Environmental Research Letters, 20(11),
114031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae03d9
vii.
Chhangani, M. K. S., Hussain, S.,
Mandot, V., Khan, I., Bhaskar, C., & Kumar. (2023). Establishing Principles of
Sustainable Development: A Comprehensive Analysis of Environmental
Jurisprudence. International Research Journal of Modernization in
Engineering Technology and Science. https://doi.org/10.56726/irjmets44318
viii.
Eygen, E. V., Meester, S. D., Tran, H.
P., & Dewulf, J. (2016). Resource savings by urban
mining: The case of desktop and laptop computers in Belgium. Resources
Conservation and Recycling, 107, 53–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.032
ix.
Francini, A., Cornelio, A., Bontempi,
E., Serpe, A., Ferrari, A. M., Neri, P., & Rosa, R. (2025). Environmental assessment of noble
metals recovery from e-waste: an ESCAPE and LCA-based comparative analysis
towards design for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 534,
147016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147016
xi.
Ghulam, S. T., & Abushammala, H. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities in the
Management of Electronic Waste and Its Impact on Human Health and Environment. Sustainability,
15(3), 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031837
xv.
Jabbour, C. J. C., Colasante, A.,
D’Adamo, I., Rosa, P., & Sassanelli, C. (2023). Comprehending e-waste limited
collection and recycling issues in Europe: A comparison of causes. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 427, 139257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139257
xx.
Mehta, M. (2025). India’s Battery Recycling Infrastructure
Gap: A Critical Review for a Circular Economy. 469–476.
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug374
xxi.
Newar, S. D., & Deka, Prof. S.
(2025). From Toxic Trash to Green
Governance: Legal and Policy Dimensions of E-Waste Regulation in India. International
Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11, 418–424.
https://doi.org/10.64252/45c5r670
xxvii.
ROLE OF AI IN E-WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RECYCLING. (n.d.).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18608803
xxviii.
Santhanam, N., Samuel, M. S., &
Chidambaram, R. (2014). Electronic waste – an
emerging threat to the environment of urban India. Journal of Environmental
Health Science and Engineering, 12(1), 36.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336x-12-36
xxx.
Sengupta, D., Ilankoon, I. M. S. K.,
Kang, K., & Chong, M. N. (2022). Circular economy and
household e-waste management in India: Integration of formal and informal
sectors. Minerals Engineering, 184, 107661.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107661
How to Cite This Article
DR. SEJAL RUSHI, DR. NIRGUN RUSHI, TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE E-WASTE MANAGEMENT IN INDIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE., White Black Legal – International Law Journal, ISSN: 2581-8503, Vol. Volume 4, Issue VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, October 2026, pp. 995-1011. Available at: https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/towards-sustainable-e-waste-management-in-india-challenges-and-opportunities-for-environmental-governance
Author & Publication Record
Authors: DR. SEJAL RUSHI & DR. NIRGUN RUSHI
Registration ID: 107184 | Published Paper ID: WBL7184 & WBL7185
Year: Oct- 2026 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 2
Approved ISSN: 2581-8503 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 995-1011
Full Text Preview
Open in New Tab
Copied