EXAMINING THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE GOVERNANCE AND HINDU TEMPLES IN INDIA: A CALL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CLARITY BY: MS. TANVI MALPANI
Read the Full Research Paper
Access the complete open-access article in PDF format. No login is required.
Abstract
[1] Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Policy Note 2022-23, www.tn.gov.in, 2022, https://www.tn.gov.in/documents/dept/32.
[2] Hindu Temples and Mutts form part of Hindu Religious Endowments.
[3] The Department is headed by a Commissioner appointed by the Government. The Commissioner is generally a person belonging to the State Judicial Services or other Services (Section 9 of the Tamil Nadu Act) and acts as a servant of the Government (Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Act)
[4] Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, § 7(1)(a), No.22 Act of Tamil Nadu, 1959 (India).
[5] Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, § 92 (1), No.22 Act of Tamil Nadu, 1959 (India).
[6] Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, § 92 (2), No.22 Act of Tamil Nadu, 1959 (India).
[7] The Karnataka Hindu Religious Institution and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997
[8] Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987
[9] Kerala has four legislations: the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950; the Koodalmanickam Devaswom Act, 1971; the Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2008
[10] Appointed under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950
[11] The Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951
[12] The Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1969
[13] Constituted under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959
[14] Under the Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act of 1950
[15] Commissioner Hindu Religious Endowments v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt (A.I.R. 1954 SC 282)
[16] Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. The State of Bombay and Others, 1954 SCR 1035.
[17] A.I.R. 1958 SC 255
[18] A.I.R. 1963 SC 1638
[19] A.I.R. 1966 SC 1119
[20] A.I.R. 1984 SC 51
[21] 2018 (8) SCJ 609
[22] During the 2018 Shabarimala Case, Justice Chandrachud was not the Chief Justice of India
How to Cite This Article
MS. TANVI MALPANI, EXAMINING THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE GOVERNANCE AND HINDU TEMPLES IN INDIA: A CALL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CLARITY BY: MS. TANVI MALPANI., White Black Legal – International Law Journal, ISSN: 2581-8503, Vol. 2, Issue 15, September 2023, pp. 11, DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-81157597/EXAMINING%20THE%20COMPLEX%20RELATIONSHIP. Available at: https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/examining-the-complex-relationship-between-state-governance-and-hindu-temples-in-india-a-call-for-constitutional-clarity-by-ms-tanvi-malpani
Author & Publication Record
Authors: MS. TANVI MALPANI
Registration ID: 101867 | Published Paper ID: 1867
Year : Sep -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 15
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 11
Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-81157597/EXAMINING THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP