---

[1] John C. Coates IV, “Fair Value” as an Avoidable Rule of Corporate Law: Minority Discounts in Conflict Transactions, 147 U. Pa. L. Rev 1251, 1274 (1999)

[2] Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Marcel Kahan, The “Lemons Effect” in Corporate Freeze-outs, NBER Working Paper 6938 (1999) 2,  <http://ssrn.com/abstract=226397> accessed on 15th July 2023.

[3] Richard A. Booth, Management Buyouts, Shareholder Welfare, and the Limits of  Fiduciary Duty, 60 N.Y.U. L. REV. 630 (1985);

[4] SJ Grossman and OD Hart, ‘Takeover bids, the free-rider problem and the theory of the corporation’ [1980] The Bell Journal of Economics 42.

[5] LA Bebchuk and OD Hart, ‘Takeover bids vs. proxy fights in contests for corporate control’ (2001).

[6] Y Amihud, M Kahan and RK Sundaram, ‘The foundation of freeze-out laws in takeovers’ [2004] The Journal of Finance 1325.

[7] Sandvik Asia Limited vs. Bharat Kumar Padamsi and Ors,  Appeal No. 308 of 2004 in Company Petition No. 478 of 2003 in Company Application No. 290 of 2003, as decided on April 4, 2009 <https://www.nishithdesai.com/corporate-update/2009/Minority%20Shareholder%20judgments.pdf> accessed on 11th August 2023.

[8] Utkarsh Mani Tripathi, ‘Evaluating Freezeout Mergers and Burden of Proof in Indian Corporate Law’, <https://www.irccl.in/post/winning-entry-evaluating-freezeout-mergers-and-burden-of-proof-in-indian-corporate-law> accessed on 11th August 2023.

[9] AIG (Mauritius) LLC v. Tata Televentures (Holdings) Limited, 2003 IIAD Delhi 672, 103 (2003) DLT 250.

[10] Hindustan Lever Employees' Union v. Hindustan Lever Ltd, (1999) IILLJ 804 Bom.

[11] Ninad Shah, ‘"FREEZE OUT": TAKEOVER AND ACQUISITION OF MINORITY INTEREST’,< https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/freeze-out-takeover-acquisition-minority-interest-ninad-shah> accessed on 11th July 2023.

[12] Rho, Hyeok-Joon, New Squeeze out Devices as a Part of Corporate Law Reform in Korea: What Type of Device is Required for a Developing Economy?. Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 29, p. 41, 2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2217488. Page 44.

[13] Croci, Ettore and Ehrhardt, Olaf and Nowak, Eric, ‘The Corporate Governance Endgame – An Economic Analysis of Minority Squeeze-Out Regulation in Germany’ <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2080745, 2013> accessed on 14th July 2023.

[14] Subramanian, Guhan . «Post-Siliconix Freeze-Outs: Theory & Evidence.» The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series. Discussion Paper No. 472 (2004) <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=530284> accessed on 14th July 2023.

[15] Cumming, Matthew ‘Take-over Bid vs Plan of Arrangement: Top 10 Considerations’, Canadian M&A Perspectives. McCarthy Tetrault. (2011) <http://www.canadianmergersacquisitions.com/2011/12/14/take-over-bid-vs-plan-of-arrangementtop-10-considerations/> accessed on 14th July 2023.

[16] Coates, IV, John C, ‘Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring: Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice’, Forthcoming in Oxford Handbook on Corporate Law and Governance.» The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series. Discussion Paper No. 781. (2014) <http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/Coates_781.pdf> accessed on 14th July 2023.

[17] Khanna, Vikramaditya S Varottil, Umakanth,  ‘Regulating Squeeze Outs in India: A Comparative Perspective’, American Journal of Comparative Law, Forthcoming; NUS Law Working Paper No. 2014/009 (2014) <http://law.nus.edu.sg/wps/pdfs/009_2014_Umakanth%20Varottil.pdf> accessed on 16th July 2023.

[18] ALLEN, KRAAKMAN & SUBRAMANIAN, supra note 11, at 497 – 98; Subramanian, supra note 16, at 8 – 11.

[19] Guhan Subramanian, ‘Fixing Freezeouts’, 115 YALE L.J. 2, 30 – 48 (2005).