White Black Legal – International Law Journal

[1] D. Sergio, “Organisation Mondiale du Commerce” (2008).

[2] D. Chirstian, “WTO / WTO Pol. 4470” (2006).

[3] G. Jacques, “For sustainable development in West Africa: Food sovereignty” (2006).

[4] D. Sandrine D, “Les relations entre les règles des accords multilateraux sur l'environnement et celles de l'OMC” (2003).

[5] B. Julien, “Effectiveness Of Dispute Settlement Mechanism Of The Wto: Towards A Better The Multilateral Trading System Predictability” (2005).

[6] L. Olivier, “GATT (Geneva), an instrument for multilateral negotiations, Mr. LONG delivered the text of the speech before an audience gathered at the Pakistan Institute of International Affairs (Karachi)” (1976).

[1] International Committee of Red Cross, ‘Command Responsibility and failure to act’ (Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, ICRC, 2014) <https://www.icrc.org/en/download/file/1087/command-responsibility-icrc-eng.pdf> accessed 31 March 2024

[2] Jamie Allan Williamson, ‘Some considerations on command responsibility and criminal liability’ (2008) 90(870) International Review of the Red Cross <https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/irrc-870_williamson.pdf> accessed 31 March 2024

[3] Sherrie L. Russell-Brown, ‘The Last Line of Defense: the Doctrine of Command Responsibility and Gender Crimes in Armed Conflict’ (2012) 22(1) WILJ <https://wilj.law.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1270/2012/02/russell-brown.pdf> accessed 31 March 2024

[4] American Red Cross, ‘Summary of  the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols’ (ARC, 2011) <https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PDF_s/International_Services/International_Humanitarian_Law/IHL_SummaryGenevaConv.pdf> accessed 31 March 2024

[5] James G. Stewart, ‘The Future of the Grave Breaches Regime: Segregate, Assimilate or Abandon?’ (2009) 7(4) JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/7/4/855/857193> accessed 31 March 2024

[6] Sandesh Sivakumaran, ‘Re-envisaging the International Law of Internal Armed Conflict’ (2011) 22(1) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/22/1/219/436546> accessed 31 March 2024

[7] Vladyslav Lanovoy, ‘The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct’ (2017) 28(2) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/28/2/563/3933332> accessed 31 March 2024

[8] Cedric Ryngaert, Anneleen Van de Meulebroucke, ‘Enhancing and Enforcing Compliance with International Humanitarian Law by Non-State Armed Groups: an Inquiry into some Mechanisms’ (2012) 16(3) JCSL < https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/16/3/443/777786> accessed 31 March 2024

[9] Tilmann Altwicker, ‘Transnationalizing Rights: International Human Rights Law in Cross Border Context’ (2018) 29(2) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/29/2/581/5057069> accessed 31 March 2024

[10] Anton O. Petrov, ‘Non-State Actors and Law of Armed Conflict Revisited: Enforcing International Law through Domestic Engagement’ (2014) 19(2) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/19/2/279/797954> accessed 31 March 2024

[11] Darryl Robinson, ‘Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court’ (2003) (14(3) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/14/3/481/440578> accessed 31 March 2024

[12] Chile Eboe-Osuji, ‘Grace Breaches’ as War Crimes: Much Ado about Serious Violations?’ (ICC) <https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/827EE9EC-5095-48C0-AB04-E38686EE9A80/283279/GRAVEBREACHESMUCHADOABOUTSERIOUSVIOLATIONS.pdf> accessed 31 March 2024

[13] Jesse Medlong, ‘All other Breaches: State Practice and the Geneva Conventions’ Nebulous Class of Less Discussed Prohibitions’ (2013) 34(4) Michigan Journal of International Law <https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=mjil> accessed 32 March 2024  

[14] Emily L. Camins, ‘Needs or Rights? Exploring the Limitations of Individual Raparations for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’ (2016) 10(1) IJTJ <https://academic.oup.com/ijtj/article/10/1/126/2356892> accessed 31 March 2024

[15] Yves Sandoz, ‘The History of the Grave Breaches Regime’ (2009) 7(4) JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/7/4/657/857200> accessed 31 March 2024

[16] In re Yamashita 327 U.S. 1 (1946)

[17] Jamie Fellows, ‘Law at a Critical Juncture: the US Army’s Command Responsibility Trials at Manila 1945-1947’ (2020) American Journal of Legal History <https://academic.oup.com/ajlh/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/ajlh/njaa005/33444498/njaa005.pdf> accessed 4 April 2024

[18] Jean Senat Fleury, ‘The Tokyo Trial’ (2022) <https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/88866210/THE_TOKYO_TRIAL-libre.pdf?1658511082=&response-content disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DTHE_TOKYO_TRIAL.pdf&Expires=1712176828&Signature=H~EGnkdrTuJHDR-E7l4r~ZlnZv~JQm9kcNrhORVh~vCUMqSBOih-MtaADQGBqfZSEd0z3ia bo0Ey6HPBSffFKOKiYuo05SqghHm9S8a1nyyj8za14acqxHq42UyrtAwyIb6pFa6Yu6B5xpOnbuup~MeoQ2G2VF4NG6EdqAHjb~vLNHoRt2NBWg3K6dslqk6R5fBj63fbl56C3pwKPpSFSl1~BsZc5MSVc~y7PbgGQyQS~IYoPm9GsfOReQBg~3PD8PURDGG8~f~Jtw9nBspyZVvivHL3P5W2hpJCGXBvUr5hgNmKEJOENxntfs2rncbi852GeXGpTNTYhmixW9qKg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA> accessed 4 April 2024

[19] David Glazier, ‘Kangaroo Court or Competent Tribunal?: Judging the 21st Century Military Commission’ (2003) 89(8) Virginia Law Review <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3202371> accessed 4 April 2024

[20] Robin Rowland, ‘Command Ability and Command Responsibility: Lt. Col. Hirateru Banno and the “F Force” Trials’ (M.A Thesis, York University 2003)

[21] Kirsten Ainley, ‘ Excesses of Responsibility: The Limits of Law and the Possibilities of Politics’ (2011) 25(4) Ethics and International Affairs <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/excesses-of-responsibility-the-limits-of-law-and-the-possibilities-of-politics/A57A5011E1A88DF744D4E1C9BC5E8439> accessed 8 April 2024

[22] Annex – A Note on Command Responsibility (Human Rights Watch) <https://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/us0405/10.htm> accessed 8 April 2024

[23] James Stewart, ‘The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes’ (2012) 25(1) LJIL <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/abs/end-of-modes-of-liability-for-international-crimes/B2D623853D6AC70CE29270F6D7CF2B36> accessed 8 April 2024

[24] United States v. Wilhelm von Leeb et al 12 LRTWC 1 at 59 (1948)

[25] Jewish Virtual Library, ‘Nazi War Crimes Trials: High Command Trial’ <https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/high-command-trial-1947-1948> accessed 31 March 2024

[26] Casebook ICRC, ‘United States Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, United States v. Wilhelm von Leeb et al’ <https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/united-states-military-tribunal-nuremberg-united-states-v-wilhelm-von-leeb-et-al> accessed 31 March 2024

[27] John Jay Doughlass, ‘High Command Case: a Study in Staff and Command Responsibility’ (1972) 6(2) International Lawyer <https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3898&context=til> accessed 31 March 2024

[28] United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, ‘Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings, Case #12: The High Command Case’ (Holocaust Encyclopedia) <https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/subsequent-nuremberg-proceedings-case-12-the-high-command-case> accessed 31 March 2024

[29] Dieter Fleck, ‘Shortcomings of the Grave Breaches Regime’ (2009) 7(4) JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/7/4/833/857159> accessed 31 March 2024

[30] Jean-Marie Henckaerts, ‘The Grave Breaches Regime as Customary International Law’ (2009) 7(4) JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/7/4/683/857186> accessed 31 March 2024

[31] Lindsay Moir, ‘Grave Breaches and Internal Armed Conflict’ (2009) 7(4) JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/7/4/763/857123> accessed 31 March 2024

[32] Sylvain Vite, ‘Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal concepts and actual situations’ (2009) 91(873) IRRC <https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638310999021X> accessed 31 March 2024

[33] Julian M. Lehmann, ‘All Necessary Means to Protect Civilians: What the Intervention in Libya Says About the Relationship Between the Jus in Bello and the Jus ad Bellum’ (2012) 17(1) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/17/1/117/865607> accessed 31 March 2024

[34] Alessandra Spadaro, ‘Punish and Be Punished? The Paradox of Command Responsibility in Armed Groups’ (2020) 18(2020) JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/jicj/mqz059/33394475/mqz059.pdf> accessed 31 March 2024 

[35] Nayef Ahmad Althunibat, ‘The Global Accountability of Commanders and Superiors: Exploring the Powers and Responsibilities of the International Criminal Court’ (2023) 5(2) Journal of Research Administration <https://journalra.org/index.php/jra/article/view/682/492> accessed 31 March 2024

[36] Jenny S. Martinez, ‘Understanding Mens Rea in Command Responsibility: From Yamashita to Blaskic and Beyond’ (2007) 5(3) JICJ < https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/5/3/638/790806> accessed 31 March 2024

[37] Hannes Jobstl, ‘Bridging the Accountability Gap: Armed Non-state Actors and the Investigation and Prosecution of War Crimes’ (2020) 18 JICJ <https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/jicj/mqaa026/33788425/mqaa026.pdf> accessed 1 April 2024 

[38] Chia Lehnardt, ‘Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal Law’ (2008) 19(5) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/19/5/1015/505543> accessed 1 April 2024

[39] Christa Meindersma, ‘Violations of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions as Violations of the Laws or Customs of War under Article 3 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2009) 42(3) Netherlands International Law Review <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00005891> accessed 1 April 2024

[40] Remy Jorritsma, ‘Where General International Law meets International Humanitarian Law: Attribution of Conduct and the Classification of Armed Conflicts’ (2018) 23(3) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/23/3/405/5236611> accessed 1 April 2024

[41] Sonja Boelaert-Suominen, ‘Grave Breaches, Universal Jurisdiction and Internal Armed Conflict: Is Customarry Law moving towards a Uniform Enforcement Mechanism for all Armed Conflicts?’ (2000) 5(1) JCSL <https://www.jstor.org/stable/44471205> accessed 2 April 2024 

[42] Benson Wawery Thuo, ‘Achieving Accountability from Terrorist Groups for War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: A Case Study of Somalia’ (2022) 1(1) EAJIHL <https://eajihl.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/EAJIHL-Journal-Vol-1-Issue-1-Downloadable-Size.pdf#page=112> accessed 2 April 2024

[43] Chiara Redaelli, ‘A Common Enemy: Aggregating Intensity in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (Humanitarian Law & Policy, 22 April 2021) <https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2021/04/22/common-enemy/> accessed 2 April 2024

[44] Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict’ (UN OHCHR New York and Geneva 2011) <https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/HR_in_armed_conflict.pdf> accessed 2 April 2024

[45] Rob Grace, ‘Surmounting Contemporary Challenges to Humanitarian-Military Relations’ (Watson Institute International & Public Affairs Brown University 2020) <https://watson.brown.edu/chrhs/files/chrhs/imce/research/Surmounting%20Contemporary%20Challenges%20to%20Humanitarian-Military%20Relations_Grace.pdf> accessed 2 April 2024

[46] United Nations, ‘International Laws Protecting Civilians in Armed Conflict Not Being Upheld, Secretary-General Warns Security Council, Urging Deadly Cycle Be Broken’ <https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15292.doc.htm> accessed 2 April 2024

[47] Mark Bonchek and Chris Fussell, ‘Use Doctrine to Pierce the Fog of Business’ (Harvard Business Review 2013) <https://hbr.org/2013/02/use-doctrine-to-pierce-the-f> accessed 2 April 2024

[48] International Review of the Red Cross, ‘International humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts’ (2007) 89(867) IRRC <https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/irrc-867-ihl-challenges.pdf> accessed 2 April 2024

[49] Guenael Mettraux, The Law of Command Responsibility (OUP 2009) chp. 4

[50] John Gentry, ‘Complex Civil-Military Operations: A U.S. Military-centric Perspective’ (2000) 53(4) Naval War College Review <https://www.jstor.org/stable/44638891> accessed 4 April 2024

[51] Nils Melzer, ‘International Humanitarian Law: A Comprehensive Introduction’ (ICRC) <https://www.jep.gov.co/Sala-de-Prensa/Documents/4231_002-IHL_WEB_13.pdf> accessed 4 April 2024

[52] Hitoshi Nasu, ‘Operationalizing the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and Conflict Prevention: Dilemmas of Civilian Protection in Armed Conflict’ (2009) 14(2) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/14/2/209/862280> accessed 4 April 2024

[53] Medecins Sans Frontieres, ‘The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law’ <https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/article/3/responsibility/> accessed 4 April 2024  

[54] Manisuli Ssenyonjo, ‘Accountability of Non-State Actors in Uganda for War Crimes and Human Rights Violations: Between Amnesty and the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 10(3) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/10/3/405/877609> accessed 4 April 2024  

[55] Nicholas Tsagourias, ‘Non-State Ungoverned Spaces and International Responsibility for Cyber Acts’ (2016) 21(3) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/21/3/455/2567829> accessed 4 April 2024

[56] Kubo Macak, ‘Decoding Article 8 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Attribution of Cyber Operations by Non-State Actors’ (2016) 21(3) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/21/3/405/2525375> accessed 4 April 2024  

[57] Shane Darcy, ‘Assistance, direction and control: Untangling international judicial opinion on individual and State responsibility for war crimes by non-State actors’ (2015) 96(893) IRRC <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/assistance-direction-and-control-untangling-international-judicial-opinion-on-individual-and-state-responsibility-for-war-crimes-by-nonstate-actors/9A3F940EDC97D401C3AAC72CD34F4834> accessed 4 April 2024

[58] Dan Saxon, ‘Violations of International Humanitarian Law by Non-State Actors during Cyberwarfare: Challenges for Investigations and Prosecutions’ (2016) 21(3) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/21/3/555/2567000> accessed 4 April 2024 

[59] Marko Milanovic, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide’ (2006) 17(1) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/17/3/553/2756272> accessed 4 April 2024

[60] Alana Tiemessen, ‘The International Criminal Court and the lawfare of judicial intervention’ (2016) 30(4) <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0047117815601201

[61] Amrei Muller, ‘Can armed Non-state Actors Exercise Jurisdiction and Thus Become Human Rights Duty-bearers?’ (2020) 20(2) HRLR <https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/article/20/2/269/5858245> accessed 4 April 2024   

[62] Harriet Bulkeley and Heike Schroeder, ‘Beyond state/non-state divides: Global cities and the governing of climate change’ (2011) 18(4) EJIR <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354066111413308> accessed 4 April 2024

[63] Claudia Hifmann and Ulrich Schneckener, ‘Engaging non-state armed actors in state- and peace-building: options and strategies’ (2012) 93(883) IRRC <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/abs/engaging-nonstate-armed-actors-in-state-and-peacebuilding-options-and-strategies/CF8BD9D922D282660D004AA2890E3AEF> accessed 4 April 2024

[64] Ben Saul, ‘Enhancing Civilian Protection by Engaging Non-State Armed Groups under International Humanitarian Law’ (2016) 22(1) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/22/1/39/2525367>

[65] David Kretzmer, ‘Rethinking the Application of IHL in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (2012) 42(1) ILR <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review/article/abs/rethinking-the-application-of-ihl-in-noninternational-armed-conflicts/FD452F1CB9260CD1EDFDA9023A15279A> accessed 4 April 2024

[66] Francesco Guimelli and Michal Onderco, ‘States, firms, and security: How private actors implement sanctions, lessons learned from the Netherlands’ (2021) 6(2) EJIS <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-international-security/article/states-firms-and-security-how-private-actors-implement-sanctions-lessons-learned-from-the-netherlands/2D74ECCB8252B534F2B36C2375BA88F1> accessed 4 April 2024

[67] Russell Buchan, ‘Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm’ (2016) 21(3) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/21/3/429/2566738> accessed 4 April 2024

[68] Jonathan Black-Brance, ‘Nuclear Terrorism by States and Non-state Actors: Global Responses to Threats to Military and Human Security in International Law’ (2017) 22(2) JCSL <https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/jcsl/krx004/19597681/krx004.pdf> accessed 4 April 2024

[69] Federica Paddeu, ‘Use of Force against Non-state Actors and the Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness of Self-Defence’ (2016) 30(1) LJIL <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/use-of-force-against-nonstate-actors-and-the-circumstance-precluding-wrongfulness-of-selfdefence/3B607A56CCE90FEEA4CFC973FDC65991> accessed 4 April 2024

[70] Stephanie Meulenbelt and Maarten Nieuwenhuizen, ‘Non-State actors’ pursuit of CBRN weapons: From motivation to potential humanitarian consequences’ (2016) 97(889) IRRC <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/nonstate-actors-pursuit-of-cbrn-weapons-from-motivation-to-potential-humanitarian consequences/F8CDDFC5729028E7ADB5039830F187FA> accessed 4 April 2024

[71] Sahla Aroussi, ‘Strange Bedfellows: Interrogating the Unintended Consequences of Integrating Countering Violent Extremism with the UN's Women, Peace, and Security Agenda in Kenya’ (2020) 17(4) Politics & Gender <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/strange-bedfellows-interrogating-the-unintended-consequences-of-integrating-countering-violent-extremism-with-the-uns-women-peace-and-security-agenda-in-kenya/4867E46CE1DF9A4AAE84B5C159BBFA52> accessed 4 April 2024

[72] Ayelet Berman, ‘Between Participation and Capture in International Rule-Making: The WHO Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors’ (2021) 32(1) EJIL <https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/32/1/227/6273003> accessed 4 April 2024 

[73] Britt Koehnlien and Ore Koren, ‘COVID-19, state capacity, and political violence by non-state actors’ (2022) 59(1)

Journal of Peace Research <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00223433211063034> accessed 4 April 2024

[74] Seunghwan Kim, ‘Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: State Sovereignty and Migration Controls at Sea in the European Context’ (2016) 30(1) LJIL <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/nonrefoulement-and-extraterritorial-jurisdiction-state-sovereignty-and-migration-controls-at-sea-in-the-european-context/DEB19084E3229F6950496F3F8044CAC6> accessed 4 April 2024

[75] Pascal Bongard and Jonathan Somer, ‘Monitoring armed non-state actor compliance with humanitarian norms: a look at international mechanisms and the Geneva Call Deed of Commitment’ (2012) 93(883) IRRC <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/abs/monitoring-armed-nonstate-actor-compliance-with-humanitarian-norms-a-look-at-international-mechanisms-and-the-geneva-call-deed-of-commitment/81753DB5717332B1C0CE0FA3BC835AFC>

[76] Gloria Gaggioli and Pavle Kilibarda, ‘Counterterrorism and the risk of over-classification of situations of violence’ (2021) 103(916-917) IRRC <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/counterterrorism-and-the-risk-of-overclassification-of-situations-of-violence/61321E0D2023274D6421F88A672C61DF> accessed 4 April 2024

[77] David Jason Karp, ‘Transnational corporations in ‘bad states’: human rights duties, legitimate authority and the rule of law in international political theory’ (2009) 1(1) International Theory <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-theory/article/abs/transnational-corporations-in-bad-states-human-rights-duties-legitimate-authority-and-the-rule-of-law-in-international-political-theory/13C3775B09B5E6E3671B991392735E3C> accessed 4 April 2024

[1] https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/agrmntseries2_gatt_e.pdf

[2] https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/gatt/gatt_e.pdf

[3] https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_01_e.htm

[4] https://www.britannica.com/topic/General-Agreement-on-Tariffs-and-Trade

[5] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228631129_Analysis_of_the_importance_of_general_agreement_on_

tariffs_and_trade_GATT_and_its_contribution_to_international_trade

[6] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gatt.asp

[7] https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/07363769610107383/full/html

[8] https://law.duke.edu/lib/research-guides/gatt

[1] Thomson Reuters, "The Future of Professionals" (accessed March 23, 2024) https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/campaigns/future-of-professionals.html

[2]  India AI Task Force, "National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence" (accessed March 25, 2024) https://indiaai.gov.in/research-reports/national-strategy-for-artificial-intelligence/

[3]  Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act)

[4]  Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, "Artificial Intelligence Committees Reports" (accessed March 22, 2024) https://www.meity.gov.in/artificial-intelligence-committees-reports

[5]LITD 30 New Standards List

[6] Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and ors. v. State of Gujarat and Ors AIR 2006 SC 1367

[7] Constitution of India, Article 14

[8] Jaswinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2023:PHHC:044541

[9] Supreme Court of India Uses AI to Transcribe Live Proceedings," accessed March 25, 2024,https://indiaai.gov.in/news/supreme-court-of-india-uses-ai-to-transcribe-live-proceedings

[10] of Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of Indi AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 1841, 2019 (1) SCC 1

[11]https://theprint.in/judiciary/ai-can-improve-judicial-systems-efficiency-full-text-of-cji-bobdes-constitution-day-speech/326893/

[12]https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Responsible-AI-in-the-Indian-Justice-System-A-Strategy-Paper.pdf

[13] Government Of India Ministry Of Law And Justice (Department Of Justice), report on Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Judicial System

[1] Arunima Baruah, The Soft Target-Crime against Women 149 (Kilaso Books, New Delhi, 2004).

[2] Gooroodass Banerjee, The Hindu Law of Marriage and Stridhan 1879 (Wentworth Press, 2016).

[3] (2003) 8 SCC 80.

[4] (2010) 11 SCC 481.

[5] 1999 Cr L J 4398.

[6] (2009) 16 SCC 605.

[1] Shuchi Agrawal & Isha Ahlawat, ‘Minority Squeeze Outs Under Takeover Law: An Analysis’ (The RMLNLU Law Review Blog, 5 October 2021)

[2] Foss V Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189

[3] Report of the Expert Committee on Company Law, chaired by Dr. Jamshed J. Irani, submitted to the MCA on May 31, 2005.

[4] Vasani B, Kanan V and Seal R, “Minority Squeeze-out under Our Company Law – Is It a Legislative Policy Dilemma” (Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas December 16, 2021)

[5] See Companies Act, 1956 S.395

[6] See Companies Act, 2013 S.235

[7] See Companies Act 2013 S.235(2) ; Companies Act 2013 S.235(3)

[8] Delisting is advantageous for the controllers because the company is first brought outside the purview of the securities laws applicable to listed companies (which are administered by SEBI) that enables it to implement the squeeze out through a less onerous legal regime than when the company is listed.

[9] See Companies Act 2013 S.230

[10] In the context of squeeze outs, a company may propose a scheme that permits either a controller or thecompany itself to purchase shares held by the minorities thereby effecting a squeeze out

[11] See Companies Act 2013 S.66

[12] See Companies Act 2013 S.68

[13] See Companies Act 2013 S.77

[14] In Re: Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd, MANU/DE/3902/2011

[15] See Companies Act 2013 S.100

[16] See Companies Act 2013 S.100

[17] Section 236(1) of the Act provides that in the event of an acquirer, or a person acting in concert with such acquirer, becomes a registered holder of 90% or more of the issued equity share capital of a company, or in the event of any person or group of persons becoming 90% majority or holding 90% of the issued equity share capital of a company, by virtue of an amalgamation, share exchange, conversion of securities or for any other reason

[18] 57th Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, The Companies Bill, 2011, 15th Lok Sabha, at Pg. 73

[19] A.P State Financial Corporation V. Gar Re-Rolling Mills (1994) 2 SCC 647

[20] There are some commonalities across these jurisdictions – in particular, the more favorable treatment given to squeeze outs when they are accompanied by the approval of independent directors on the board and afavorable vote of disinterested shareholders (i.e., the minorities – sometimes called a “majority of theminority” (MoM) ratification)