[1] Shashwat Bhardwaj, 3rd Year, B.A. LLB, Delhi Metropolitan Education, GGSIPU, New Delhi, E-Mail ID – shashwatbhardwaj23@gmail.com

[2] Amarchand Lalit Kumar vs Shri Ambica Mills Ltd., 1966 AIR 1036, 1963 SCR (2) 953.

[3] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act 26 of 1996), s.10.

[4] United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958), art. II

[5] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act 26 of 1996) s.2(1)(f)

[6] TDM Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ue Development India Pvt. Ltd., Arbitration Application No. 2 Of 2008

[7] The Quest for making India as the Hub of International Arbitration, available at: https://www.pmindia.gov.in/en/news_updates/the-quest-for-making-india-as-the-hub-of-international-arbitration/

[1] Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State of West Bengal, State Of U.P" SCC Online.

[2] Criminal Justice system.

[3] Legal News and Views" volume 20, May 5, 2006.

[4] Indian Constitutional law (6th Edition, 2010).

[5] Human Rights Protection and the Provisions of Human Rights under Constitution, Indian Bar Review (1983).

[6] Indian Viewpoint on the Human rights of Accused People (BBPM Law Associates, New Delhi, 2001).

[7] Human rights of adolescent offenders and accused: delinquents in legal trouble (Kalpaz Publications, 2005).

[8] Human Rights and Inhuman Wrongs (B.R. Publishing Company, New Delhi, 1990).

[9] The principle against ex-post facto laws.

[10] A.K Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR, 1950 SC 27.

[11] Halsbury’s, Laws Of England, Vol X, 1955, p.405-406.

[12] Constitution of India, Art.22 (1) “No one who is arrested may be held in detention without being promptly informed of the reasons for their detention, nor may they be refused the opportunity to speak with and be represented by a lawyer of their choosing..

[13]  Section 50, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973..

[14] S. P. Dwivedi, Procedural Privileges of the Accused 10, Indian Advocate, 1970, p.75.

[15] Criminal Procedure Code,  sec.56, 57.

16 Bengali Supreme Court and Archivist of Legal Affairs V. Zahir Ali, 37 Cr. L.J. 1070, 63 CAL 189.

17   The accused: A comparative analysis, by J.A. Coults, British Institute of Global International Law.

[18] Iqbal Kaur Kwatra v. Director General of Police, Jaipur, 1996 CrLJ 2600 (AI’-DB); see also Carbon Ali v. Intelligence Officer, Air Intelligence Unit, NIPt Salor, 1996 CrLJ 2420 (Born).

[19] 1978 Cri.L.J. 1062 (Pat.) See also observations in Shyam Dattaray beturkar v. Special Executive Magistrate, Kalyan, 1999 Cri.L.J. 2676 (Bom.H C )

[20] 1989 Cri.L.J. 383 (H. P.)

[1] Eureka Forbes Limited vs. Allahabad Bank and Ors. MANU/SC/0322 (2010)

[2] The Hindu Succession Act,1956, Section 25, No. 30, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).

[3] Kenchava Sanyellappa Hosmani vs Girimalappa Channappa Somasagar, AIR Privy Council 209 (1924)

[4] Ibid

[5] M. Nagarajan v. V. M. Nagammal (2011) SCC ONLINE MAD 2547

[6]M. Nagarajan v. V. M. Nagammal(2011) SCC ONLINE MAD 2547)

[7] Smt. Janak Rani Chadha v. State (NCT of Delhi) AIR 2007 DELHI 107

[8] Mohinder Kaur & Ors. V. Wassan Singh & Ors., 1968 SCC OnLine P&H 67

[9] Vellikannu v. R. Singaperumal & Anr, (2005) 6 SCC 622

[10] Gangu vs. Chandrabhagabai (1908) 32 Bom. 275

[11] MANU/SC/0287/1966

[12] MANU/SC/0772/2013

[i] Reserve Bank of India,  https://www.rbi.org.in/commonperson/English/scripts/Notification.aspx?Id=889 (last visited  April 4, 2024)

[ii] Subhamoy Das, Commercial Banks and Industrial Finance in India: The Pre Liberalization Scenario,   XXXV & XXXVI,  BUSINESS STUDIES, 1, 8 & 9, (2014 & 2015)

[iii] State Bank of India v. Rajesh Agarwal, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 342

[iv] Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, S. 13, No. 54, Acts if Parliament, 2002 (India)

[v] Santosh Kumar Das, Two Phases of NPAs in India’s Banks, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development,1, 2 (2021),  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://isid.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/WP240.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjss7qbtsyFAxUNd2wGHWRnCkEQFnoECBMQBg&usg=AOvVaw1k5Q2H3pZE7VMScxHGbvHX  

[vi] Sulagna Das and Abhijit Dutta, A Study on NPA of Public Sector Banks in India, 16, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 75,  77 (2014) 

[vii] Waseem Ahmad, Non – Performing Assets In The Banks: Causes, Stress and Remedies, 4, Review of Professional Management, 70, 71 (2006) 

[viii] Legal History before passing SARFAESI Act , https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/legal-history-before-passing-sarfaesi-act-4688.asp (last visited April 15, 2024)

[ix]  The Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, No. 54, Acts of Parliament  2002 (India)

[x] Press Information Bureau, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1990752#:~:text=EASE%20was%20conceptualized%20to%20improve,HR%20transformation%20and%20Governance%20etc (last visited  April 17, 2024)

[xi] Amit Kumar Singh and Renuka Prasad, A Trend Analysis of NPAs of Banks in India for 2008-2018,  Business Analyst, 23, 30 (2020)

[i] Ralph Lauren, Good Reads, https://www.good reads.com/quotes/538638 – fashion-is-not-necessarily-about-labels-it-is-not-about-brands

[ii] Microfibres Inc Vs Giridhar & Co.2006 (32) PTC 157(Del)

[iii] Case No.CS(OS)1446 of 2011 decided on 15.5.2013

[iv] Some authors add two more to this list-diffusion and bridge.

[v] Nicole Giambarrese, The Look for Less: A survey of intellectual property protections in the Fashion Industry, 26 Tourol.Rev.243(2010)

[vi] Philip Liu, An Open Shield:Antitrust Arguments against Extending copyright protection to Fashion Designs, 23 INFO.&COMM.TECH.L.,159 (2014) 

[vii] Philip Liu, An Open Shield: Antitrust Arguments against Extending Copyright Protection to Fashion Desings, 23 INFO&COMM.TECH.L.159(2014)

[viii] Kimberly A. Harchuck, Fashion Design Protection. The Eternal Plight of the soft sculpture, 4 AKRON INTELLPROP-073 (2010). 

[ix] Manaswini Raj, Flashing Badges and Design-copyright: A case comment, 22 NATL, Sch.India, Rev.199(2010). 

[x] Susanna Monseau, “ European Design Right : A Model for the Protection of All Designers from Piracy”, American Business Law Journal, Vol 46, Issue 1, Spring 2011.

[xi] Case C-345/13, CJEU, June 19,2014.

[xii] Tribunal de commerce, Paris, May 18,1994, E.C.C.1994, 512(Fr)

[xiii] Legge 22 aprile 1941, n.633 in G.U, Jul.7,1941,n.166,art 2(10) (lt.) available at http://wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=10311.

[xiv] Mario Franzosi, Design Protection Italian Style, 1 J. Intellectual Property Law & Prac.599,602 (2006).