White Black Legal – International Law Journal

[1] Environmental Issues Earth is Facing in 2022, Eurovision, https://eagrovision.com/environmental-issues/

[2] Environmental Issues Earth is Facing in 2022, Eurovision, https://eagrovision.com/environmental-issues/

[3]https://www.envirotech-online.com/news/environmental-laboratory/7/international-environmental-technolo.

[4] Environmental Issues Earth, supra note 17, at 19.

[5] 9 Environmental Issues Earth, supra note 17, at 19.

[6] .ENVIRONMENTS (PERFECTION) ACt, 1986. § 2( a )ACT NO. 29 OF 1986.

[7]  ENVIRONMENTS (PERFECTION) ACt, 1986 § 2(b)ACT NO. 29 OF 1986

[8] ENVIRONMENTS (PERFECTION) ACt, 1986 § 2(c)ACT NO. 29 OF 1986.

[9] https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972

[10] https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972

[11] https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972

[12] Dr. Vinay N. Paranjape  , environmental  law 103(1st edition2016).

[13]NDIA CONST. Art. 253.

[14]NDIA CONST. Art. 14.

[15] NDIA CONST. Art. 19(A )g.

[16] NDIA CONST. Art. 21.

[17] SUCH AS RIGHT TO EDUCATION UNNIKRISHNAN VS STATE OF MADY PRADESH.

[18]DR.VINAY N. PARANJAPE, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 110(1ST EDITION  2016)

[19] NDIA CONST. art. 48 A, AMENDED BY THE CONSTRUCTION (FORTY SECONDS AMENDMENT) ACT,1976.

[20] NDIA CONST. art. 51.

[21]NDIA CONST. art. 51A(k), amended by The Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002.

[22] Crime Records Bureau Volume II 2022.

[23]  AIR 2001 SC 1948

[24] AIR 2002 SC 40.

[25] AIR 1980  SC 1622.

[26]AIR 2000 SC1997.

[27] AIR 1997 SC 734.

[28] (2014) 4 SCC 538.

[1] Johnson, Michael. (2022). Capacity to Marry: Revisiting Mette v. Mette. International Family Law Review, 15(2), 201-220.

[2] Brown, Emma. (2024). Mette v. Mette Reconsidered: Exploring the Role of Domicile in Marriage Law. European Journal of Legal Studies, 12(3), 123-145.

[3] Garcia, Luis. (2021). Legal Capacity and International Marriages: Lessons from Mette v. Mette. Comparative Law Review, 25(1), 78-98.

[4] Patel, Aisha. (2023). The Impact of Mette v. Mette on Conflict of Laws in Marriage Cases. Journal of Private International Law, 18(3), 456-478.

[1] “Anam Khan, Settlement of disputes in International Law, iPleaders Blog, 29 April 2020, available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in/settlement-of-disputes-in-international-law/"

[2] “Anam Khan, Settlement of disputes in International Law, iPleaders Blog, 29 April 2020, available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in/settlement-of-disputes-in-international-law/"

[3] “Mohit Choudhary, Peaceful Means of Dispute Settlement, Legal Services India, available at: https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1828-peaceful-means-of-dispute-settlement.html"

[4] “Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in International Law, Law Bhoomi, 8 June 2021, available at: https://lawbhoomi.com/peaceful-settlement-of-disputes-in-international-law/"

[5] “SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES, Know Law, 16 January 2021, available at:

https://knowlaw.in/index.php/2021/01/16/settlement-of-international-disputes/"

[6] “Mohit Choudhary, Peaceful Means of Dispute Settlement, Legal Services India, available at: https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1828-peaceful-means-of-dispute-settlement.html"

[1] Pannalal Bansilal Pitti v. State of A.P, (1996) AIR SC 1023.

[2] Anukul Chandra Pradhan v. Union of India, (1997) 6 SCC 1.

[3] Sasadhar Chakravarty v. Union of India, (1997) AIR SC 336.

[4] Wilmot in Rex v. Almon (1765) Wilmot's Notes, 243.

[5] Gilbert Ahnee v. Director of Public Prosecutions, (1999) 2 AC 294.

[6] Vishram Singh Raghubanshi v. State of U.P., (2011) AIR SC 2275.

[7] National Human Rights Commission v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, (1996) AIR SC 164.

[8]  Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, AIR. 200 SC 498.

[9] Raghunath Rao, Ganapath Rao v. Union of India, (1993) AIR SC 1267.

[10] Sharma Transport v. Government of A.P., (2002) 2 SCC 188.

[11] Millington v. Loring 50 LJQB 214.

[12] State of Bombay v. F N Balsara, (1951) SCR 682.

[13] Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, (1994) 3 SCC 569.

[14] Law Commission, Contempt of Court: Scandalizing the Court (Law Com No 335, 2012) para 47.

[15] C. K. Daphtary & Ors V. O. P. Gupta, (1971) AIR 1132.

[16] Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1.

[17] Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of U.P., (1954) SCR 116.

[18] S. Rangaraian v. P Jagjivan Ram, (1989) 2 SCC 574.

[19] P.N. Dua vs. P. Shiv Shanker and Ors., (1988) 3 SCC 167.

[20] Craig v. Harney, (1947) 331 US 367.

[21] Regina v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (1968) 2 All ER 319.

[22] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of lndia, (2019) 1 SCC 1.

[23] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1990) 1 SCR 535.

[1] Pannalal Bansilal Pitti v. State of A.P, (1996) AIR SC 1023.

[2] Anukul Chandra Pradhan v. Union of India, (1997) 6 SCC 1.

[3] Sasadhar Chakravarty v. Union of India, (1997) AIR SC 336.

[4] Wilmot in Rex v. Almon (1765) Wilmot's Notes, 243.

[5] Gilbert Ahnee v. Director of Public Prosecutions, (1999) 2 AC 294.

[6] Vishram Singh Raghubanshi v. State of U.P., (2011) AIR SC 2275.

[7] National Human Rights Commission v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, (1996) AIR SC 164.

[8]  Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, AIR. 200 SC 498.

[9] Raghunath Rao, Ganapath Rao v. Union of India, (1993) AIR SC 1267.

[10] Sharma Transport v. Government of A.P., (2002) 2 SCC 188.

[11] Millington v. Loring 50 LJQB 214.

[12] State of Bombay v. F N Balsara, (1951) SCR 682.

[13] Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, (1994) 3 SCC 569.

[14] Law Commission, Contempt of Court: Scandalizing the Court (Law Com No 335, 2012) para 47.

[15] C. K. Daphtary & Ors V. O. P. Gupta, (1971) AIR 1132.

[16] Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1.

[17] Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of U.P., (1954) SCR 116.

[18] S. Rangaraian v. P Jagjivan Ram, (1989) 2 SCC 574.

[19] P.N. Dua vs. P. Shiv Shanker and Ors., (1988) 3 SCC 167.

[20] Craig v. Harney, (1947) 331 US 367.

[21] Regina v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (1968) 2 All ER 319.

[22] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of lndia, (2019) 1 SCC 1.

[23] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1990) 1 SCR 535.

[1] 2G Scam Case: Special CBI Court Acquits All 19 Accused In https://www.livelaw.in/2g-scam-case-special- cbi-court-acquits-19-accused-money-laundering-case-also/

[2] Google Docs. (n.d.). ED Vs. A. Raja and others (1).pdf. [online] Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kIdnLVknHuZnlCxY8bYPJ69FEEi30K8S/view

[3] LAW FOR ALL : Sec. 498 A . .304 B and 302 I.P.C ....

https://freelegalconsultancy.blogspot.com/2014/07/sec-498-304-b-and-302-ipc-acquitted.html

[4] I/b

[5] I/b