CONCEPT OF MARKET ACCESS UNDER THE GATS � AN ANALYSIS(By - Sudhanshu Mishra & Amresh Swarnkar)

CONCEPT OF MARKET ACCESS UNDER THE GATS – AN ANALYSIS

Authored By - Sudhanshu Mishra

Co-author – Amresh Swarnkar

Course: B.A. LL.B. {Hons.}

Maharashtra National Law University, Aurangabad

Declaration

I, the undersigned solemnly declare that the project report on “Concept of Market Access under the GATS – An Analysis”; is based on my own work. I assert the statements made and conclusions drawn are an outcome of my research work.

I further certify that:

1. The work contained in the report is original and has been done by me under the general supervision of my supervisor.

2. Whenever we have used materials (data, theoretical analysis, and text) from other sources, we have given due credit to them in the text of the report and giving their details in the references.

Table Of Contents

ABSTRACT

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

RESEARCH METHEDOLOGY

SCOPE AND LIMITATION

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

INTRODUCTION

AN OVERVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERVICES

MARKET ACCESS FOR DEVELOPING ECONOMIES

Article XVI-XVII GATS under nutshell

A. Developing economies and comparative advantage

B. Market access and the movement of natural persons

C. Market access and tourism services

D. Market export and new export opportunities

WHAT ARE THE RESTRICTIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS?

CONCLUSION

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abstract

The viability of a nation's administration area straightforwardly affects the generally financial and exchange execution of the economy. In addition to the fact that economies depend vigorously on the help area for work and pay, yet a significant number of these administrations like banking, broadcast communications, and transportation likewise act as imperative delegate inputs for different areas to productively work.

With regards to an economy's administration area advancement, item specialization, pay development, and financial modernization are altogether inseparably connected. Since administrations establish a significant level of the foundation expected to support venture and monetary development, ensuring their effective conveyance is indispensable to upgrading an economy's absolute efficiency.

The impacts of exchange limitations on the arrangement of administrations are intricate, and ongoing financial displaying has given knowledge into the potential pay gains; in any case, extra exploration is fundamental. With regards to administrations exchange, there are a heap of expansive and particular limitations, and it is oftentimes difficult to catch every one of the repercussions of these requirements on help valuing and costs. In relation to the above the paper thus, focuses to study upon the market access under the GATS.

Keywords: economy, administration, market, development, GATS.

Significance Of The Study

GATS is directly tied to developing a well-founded structure for international trade. GATS is intended to guarantee that WTO nations adopt transparent and equitable laws and regulations to services trade. The goal of the GATS is to build a robust international framework of principles and set of norms and obligations for service trade.

In order to look after the global market or the foreign market it is necessary to look after the concept of market access under the GATS, and thus it is the most significant part of the study here.

Objectives Of The Study
The objective of the research project is to understand the meaning and significance of the concept of market access under the GATS, and obtaining a proper overview of how the international trade operates in the market and also in terms of servies.

How is the administration of market access for the developing economies worldwide, the paper also deals with proper analysis of Articles XVI and XVII of GATS and what are the restrictions and their effects accordingly.

The study in the paper focuses on the following topics: concept of market access, an overview of international trade in services, market access for developing economies, developing economies and comparative advantage, market access and the movement of natural persons, etc.

Review Of The Literature

An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration:

In this research the researcher is dealing with the basic interpretation of the topic “Concept of Market Access under the GATS – An Analysis” especially under the GATS and the basic authenticity and accountability of the topic “Concept of Market Access under the GATS – An Analysis”.

Division of work under review into categories:

Creating economies have a more prominent potential for progression benefits than industrialized economies, especially through advancement of their own help area.
Global exchanges that were beforehand unthinkable or exorbitantly costly have become typical because of the simplicity with which individuals may now move and impart across worldwide lines.
The GATS explicitly avoids measures influencing normal people looking for work, as well as measures influencing citizenship, home, and extremely durable business.

Research Questions

What is the concept of market access under the GATS?
What is the meaning of international trade in services?
What is the scope of market access for developing economies?
What is the significance of Articles XVI-XVII under GATS?
What are the restrictions and their effects under GATS?

Statement Of Problem

In order to know the concept of market access under the GATS, it is necessary to know about what is meant by market access under the GATS, however what is international trade in services under GATS, the scope of market access for the developing economies.

The paper also discusses about how is the administration of market access for the developing economies worldwide, the paper also deals with proper analysis of Articles XVI and XVII of GATS and what are the restrictions and their effects accordingly.

The paper thus, also focuses upon the problem with the question in regards to the scope, significance, effects, restrictions and nature under the GATS.

Research Methodology

The plan of conducting a research is known as Research methodology. There are two main types of doing research which are doctrinal and non-doctrinal. Doctrinal research includes theoretical research and includes sources such as reports of committees, acts made by legislature, judicial precedents and legal history. Non-doctrinal has field work as its main constituent. This research is Doctrinal in nature as it is based on data from books, previous reports and person’s own understanding.

The information accessed for the paper was obtained through secondary and tertiary sources available. The information was accessed through various online portals, government websites, various published research reports and other media sources.

Scope And Limitation

The research paper limits its research to study all the market access under the GATS interpretation and its critical analysis. As, GATS recognises four types of service provisioning: cross-border commerce, consuming abroad, commercial presence, and natural person presence. The paper is limited to the scope market access under the GATS and thus not deal with any other concepts or services provided under GATS.

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

GATS

Introduction
The viability of a nation's administration area straightforwardly affects the generally financial and exchange execution of the economy. In addition to the fact that economies depend vigorously on the help area for work and pay, yet a significant number of these administrations like banking, broadcast communications, and transportation likewise act as imperative delegate inputs for different areas to productively work. The accessibility of elite administrations at reasonable costs is a basic angle in deciding the worldwide seriousness of regular areas in arising nations. The best way to deal with guaranteeing that administrations are presented at world costs is for an economy to be presented to the difficulties and chances of global contest, as well concerning the advantages of exchange and venture progression. Advancement benefits creating economies by extending market access and empowering them to trade administrations in which they enjoy a cutthroat benefit or relative strength. Admittance to worldwide administrations markets is pivotal for agricultural countries since it empowers them to support trade income and work opportunities for their residents, as well as work on the proficiency of their own economies, permitting them to prepare assets for improvement. Worldwide financial reconciliation and mechanical upgrades have worked with global exchange administrations, opening up an abundance of new commodity open doors for creating economies. Creating economies have a more prominent potential for progression benefits than industrialized economies, especially through advancement of their own help area. Homegrown progression empowers assets to be coordinated toward the most useful purposes attainable.

A more effective assignment of assets diminishes the expense of labour and products, extends the reach and nature of open administrations, and fortifies all out monetary limit, empowering exchange horticulture and industry, which have generally been significant commodity workers for agricultural nations.[1] A well-working monetary administrations area is critical for financial limit improvement and improvement progression. Changed and fittingly directed monetary administrations areas productively prepare capital for speculation, give instalment components to business exchanges, and backing the steadiness of monetary foundations. These are on the whole advantages of an unrestricted economy.

With regards to changing administrations exchange, complex general balance models can reveal insight into the normal genuine pay benefits related with a more proficient distribution of improvement assets. At the point when the advantages of changing exchange administrations are weighed against the advantages of changing exchange farming and assembling, the discoveries lay out a system for bartering needs. They not just give basic data to arbitrators and government officials about the forthcoming advantages of extended market access, yet in addition significant data on elective progression procedures. The best acquires will be acknowledged by changing all assistance markets, both homegrown and worldwide. Regardless of whether acquiring market access in different business sectors is incredibly troublesome strategically, a worldwide structure that works with market access in different countries might act as an impetus for changing one's own homegrown market.[2] While this examination centres around unfamiliar market advancement, observational exploration shows that most of benefits accumulate through inside progression, in which how you help yourself is a higher priority than how others help you.

An Overview Of International Trade In Services

In 2000, worldwide assistance sends out added up to US$ 1,435 billion, representing generally 20% of all out worldwide commodities that year (WTO, 2001a). True to form, Asia, North America, and Western Europe are the districts with the best progression of administration products and imports. More than 88% of administration sends out begin in only three districts: the European Union (45%), North America (22%), and Asia (12%). (12% ). (21%). Asia and the Rest of the World are, separately, the world's biggest net merchants of products and administrations. In both created and arising economies, administration creation as often as possible records for the biggest portion of GDP and work. While the help area contributes for somewhere in the range of 40% and 60% of GDP and work in immature nations, it represents somewhere in the range of 60% and 80% in created economies (Hardin and Holmes, 1997).[3]

While the portion of GDP alloted to administrations is for the most part lower in non-industrial countries than in created ones, arising nations' administration areas are expanding at a quicker rate

than fostered nations' (OECD, 1999). Because of the way that administrations are key contributions to all parts of handling and creation, their worth to an economy is far more prominent than recommended by their direct sectoral portion of GDP and work. With regards to an economy's administration area advancement, item specialization, pay development, and financial modernization are altogether inseparably connected. Since administrations establish a significant level of the foundation expected to support venture and monetary development, ensuring their effective conveyance is indispensable to upgrading an economy's absolute efficiency. Worldwide financial reconciliation and specialized enhancements have brought about the continuous development of a range of exchanged administrations, which are characterized as exchanges including occupants and non-inhabitants, as well as cross-line exchanges. Global exchanges that were beforehand unthinkable or exorbitantly costly have become typical because of the simplicity with which individuals may now move and impart across worldwide lines. Various the travel industry administrations, for instance, have been transferrable as the expense of global air travel has diminished in ongoing many years. Already, these administrations were accessible just to inhabitants in their own homes.[4]

Market Access For Developing Economies

Market section is basically more challenging for administrations than it is for things. Market access for items involves the end of exchange hindrances, for example, taxes on things entering a market. Market access for administrations is worried about limiting less apparent government strategy activities that might happen once a specialist co-op enters the market. Regularly, these actions appear as unofficial laws coordinated at homegrown as opposed to exchange strategy goals. The effect of such arrangements on business and global specialist co-ops' market access is scarcely investigated. To profit from market access in administrations, as with items, one should initially characterize one's similar benefit and specialization underway and trade. While emerging nations can autonomously dissect their relative benefit, further developing product incomes requires recognizing and settling outer market imperatives.

Articles XVI–XVII GATS in a nutshell

Articles XVI and XVII of GATS are remembered for Part III. Responsibilities are explicit in nature on the grounds that every Member has the choice of if these obligations apply to them.

Article XVI of the GATS forbids hostile to separation measures. Article XVI:2 indicates which estimates Members may not keep up with in areas where complete market access has been ensured. For example, a specialist co-op might be disallowed from utilizing in excess of a predetermined number of normal creatures. Moreover, it fuses regulations denying or requiring the arrangement of specific kinds of legitimate organizations or joint endeavors, as well as disallowances on unfamiliar capital interest.

As opposed to Article XVI, GATS makes no notice of precluded measures. As opposed to that, it forces individuals to treat global administrations and providers "as well as equivalent homegrown administrations and providers." According to Article XVII:2, this obligation envelops both by right and true separation. As per Article XVII:3, an action disregards public treatment commitments if it'modifies the cutthroat climate for the Member's administrations and administration providers'. As per Article 10 commentary 10, no Member will be compelled to make up for any intrinsic serious detriments coming from the unfamiliar beginning of the applicable administrations or specialist co-ops.[5]

These arrangements apply assuming a Member goes into explicit help area responsibilities. They have a decision of administration area and method of arrangement. They mean to change, and by how much. Individuals trying to change a help area should remember it for every strategy for supply's Market Access and National Treatment areas. There are three methods for making express guarantees. To start, none. Market access and public treatment standards completely include the area and method of supply. The second is free. Responsibilities don't matter to specific methods of supply or subsectors. the actions that are absolved The Member might focus on something yet restrict it to specific circumstances or excluded a few measures with a short assertion or rundown of the regulation.

Both Market Access and National Treatment are worried about biased rehearses: Article XVI:2 forbids prejudicial and non-discriminatory direct, and homegrown and unfamiliar administrations and providers should be dealt with similarly. In this manner, Article XVII might apply to

oppressive measures expressed in Article XVI.[6]

This confuses the assignment of deciphering individuals' guarantees. At the point when a Member documents an unbound responsibility under market access however none under public treatment, deciding the level of advancement might challenge. Is this to say that it holds the position to separate under Article XVI (for example the unbound engraving wins) or that it resolves to avoid separating under the two Articles XVI and XVII (for example the loosened engraving wins)? The actual GATS is of no utilization, as it doesn't indicate which proviso applies in this occasion.

Also, the cross-over confuses recognizing the legitimate norm for a prejudicial measure. Since Articles XVI and XVII are particular and make unmistakable impacts. Article XVI doesn't need an assessment of the prejudicial idea of the action. Instead of that, it means to decide if the promise not to embrace or hold quantitative cutoff points has been abused. It restricts the utilization of an assortment of market access obstructions no matter what their unfair nature. Individuals should give 'treatment no less ideal' for unfamiliar administrations and providers than they do to'similar' homegrown administrations and providers subject to public treatment. Note 5 This gives Members the power to institute nondiscriminatory guidelines. Article XVI is a more tough and demanding standardizing arrangement than Article XVII. Reference 6 If the cross-over is seen accurately, the non-separation promise for Members might turn out to be more severe.[7]

A. Developing economies and comparative advantage

The cutting edge economy is generally dependent on specialization and cross-line exchange. The hypothesis of near advantage gives the most principal insightful clarification for the peculiarities alluded to as exchange benefits.  According to the rule of administration specialization, an economy ought to have some expertise in the creation and commodity of administrations in which it enjoys a near benefit, while bringing in administrations in which it has a similar detriment. Worldwide business done on this premise will bring about the world maker delivering administrations at the most minimal conceivable relative expense, while likewise advancing the amount of administrations consumed.

The assets of creation and innovative capacities blessed by a nation are the significant determinants of its near advantage. In financial aspects, factor gift alludes to how much assets a nation has as land, work, or capital that might be utilized for creation. The expression "innovation" alludes to asset use that is effective. An economy might have plentiful variable enrichments of untalented work as well as an upper hand in labour-escalated administrations, like development and the travel industry. Then again, an economy might have a confined pool of exceptionally talented work, giving a benefit in the arrangement of lawful administrations. Work administrations or administrations that vigorously depend on work, like the travel industry, are obviously regions where agricultural countries have a strategic advantage. Certain arising economies additionally partake in an upper hand in the arrangement of development and transportation administrations, yet the extent of this benefit differs by country. Moreover, new commodity open doors for non-industrial countries are arising in the interchanges and data innovation areas.[8]

B. Market access and the movement of natural persons

Low-and semi-gifted work movement is a huge wellspring of near advantage for creating economies. Regardless of information inadequacies, it seems like emerging nations trade work administrations while created nations import them (WTO, 2001b). Conditions for individuals versatility exchange are oftentimes more limited than those for different sorts of supply (Drabek and Laird, 2001). Various capital-concentrated industrialized economies license the passage of profoundly talented specialists however not of low-gifted specialists from work rich arising economies. For instance, development laborers are denied from entering industrialized economies for a brief timeframe (Stewart, 1993). The arrangements made under the GATS mirror the restricted idea of this method of supply. The market access necessities for the transportation of regular people are far stricter than those for some other method of transport (WTO, 2001b). Most of obligations apply to all support areas, and typically, as opposed to helping market access, they limit it. Also, responsibilities distinguish who is qualified to go to a market - chief, director, or master - and why - business organizing, deals exchanges, or business presence.

Various cutoff points on brief work relocation are forced through homegrown guidelines, most of which are regulatory in nature. Human development is obliged by four fundamental kinds of limitations:

• Guidelines administering section migration These imperatives incorporate tough work license necessities, extended application cycles, and constraints on stay and business adaptability.

• Affirmation of qualifications, mastery, and preparing. Except if and until unfamiliar specialist organizations are remembered, they can't arrive at the market. Unfamiliar certificate or licensure is likewise viewed as dependent upon the situation.

Disparity between workers serving in the homegrown and unfamiliar administrations Foreign specialist organizations generally face severe capability and qualification necessities (citizenship or residency).

• Business presence is essential. Ordinarily, unfamiliar work force are liable to some type of foundation. Creating economies have an insignificant business presence and consequently can't give work administrations.

Further developed market access benefits agricultural nations by expanding send out benefits and business open doors. Impermanent exchange human versatility additionally adds to the advancement of neighbourhood human resources. Getting back from an unfamiliar administrations market empowers the procurement of new abilities and data that might be utilized to fortify homegrown capacities.[9]

To get close enough to laid out business sectors, emerging nations should advance the advantages of such exchange and handle related issues. Created economies can obtain similar gifts and aptitude from more affordable unfamiliar work, lightening inflationary tensions brought about by developing wages. Low work costs benefit created economy firms by expanding overall revenues, which might be reinvested in R&D to make more imaginative items in a cutthroat market.

Work market progression habitually makes a huge number of intricacies, most of which are political in nature. Legislatures find it challenging to acknowledge the advantages of less expensive work imports when vocal homegrown vested parties term the program a "danger to homegrown positions." The grumblings of a couple should be weighed against the economy's general

advantages. There might be a requirement for instruction of legislatures and lobbyists. Likewise with any progression, there will be transient change costs related with redistributing assets in a formerly safeguarded work market, yet economies bringing in (and sending out) work administrations will benefit over the long haul. States and lobbyists are worried about long-lasting relocation and work misfortune. The GATS explicitly avoids measures influencing normal people looking for work, as well as measures influencing citizenship, home, and extremely durable business. The last option plans to advance work market progression while permitting WTO Members to practice command over regular individual section and brief stay, including defending the respectability of normal people and it is deliberate to guarantee their development across borders. Outsiders might be denied section into specific countries because of movement limitations. Market access can be kept up with by changing to a less productive yet more affordable method of supply. India's product administrations industry has risen rapidly during the earlier ten years, both locally and around the world. Indeed, even while industrialized nations keep on monumental travel limitations on Indians, the business contends on an overall scale (Chadha, 2001)[10]. Furthermore, created economies might be more agreeable to work being encapsulated in a help given to the homegrown market than to coordinate section.

C. Market access and tourism services

The travel industry is the main wellspring of income for non-industrial nations. It is one of the quickest developing sections of the assistance business, representing generally 35% of worldwide commodities (WTO, 2001b). It is a critical manager in arising economies. The near benefit of creating economies in the travel not set in stone by normal attractions and minimal expense objections. The normal and social variety of emerging nations draws in unfamiliar financial backers. Most of the main exporters of traveller administrations are island countries. For vacationers from rich nations, heading out to an it is comparably reasonable to foster country.

A creating economy is responsible for traveller administrations market access. Sightseers fly globally to exploit these administrations. Permitting outsiders passage gives a market to traveller administrations. Individual traveller visas and cash moves are limited in creating economies, lessening their true capacity for the travel industry send out income amplification.

To boost the travel industry send out pay, a great foundation is required. Vacationers depend on the consistent activity of transportation, correspondence, and banking frameworks. For journeys and touring, the homegrown economy requires dependable transportation, media communications, and monetary administrations.[11] Various growing business sectors require the advancement of these basic info administrations for the travel industry and different areas.

D. Market access and new export opportunities

Furthermore, non-industrial nations could extend their administration send out bases. Semi-gifted information based administrations in the correspondence and it are incorporated to process areas. These valuable open doors came because of progressions in data innovation and internet business. For example, India has fostered a top notch, minimal expense programming industry as of late (Chadha, 2001).

A plenty of business administrations might give developing business sectors a strategic advantage. Proficient administrations, like minimal expense engineering, counseling designing, legitimate examination, and statistical surveying; specialized help to other creating economies, for example, low-and medium-tech fabricating processes, modern designing, modern plan, and innovative work; and administrations, for example, multilingual seaward call habitats (UNCTAD, 1998, 2001).[12]

Since minimal expense work administrations might give creating economies a similar edge in specific ventures, market access is dependent upon individuals development. These new open doors bring about the production of a few new positions. Worldwide work deficiencies exist for a portion of these administrations, most remarkably programming advancement. Work license and visa restrictions oblige the capacity of agricultural nations to import work (WTO, 1998). As recently noted, creating economies can gain by a portion of these potential open doors by offering non-human types of assistance.

What Are The Restrictions And Their Effects?

As indicated by the models, progression benefits creating economies more than created economies. They are the result of homegrown help market progression, not of expanded admittance to worldwide assistance markets.

This raises worries about the nature and extent of administration exchange limitations blocking arising economies' progression. Recognizing and assessing limitations uncovers which economies are the most prohibitive and which economies have the best potential for development. Contrasting economies becomes simpler when exchange imperatives are measured in view of their inclusion and early evaluations of the general seriousness of different sorts of limitations.[13]

These experiences can be utilized to assess the effect of administration valuing and cost-cutting measures. Up to this point, it was accepted that measuring the outcomes of administration exchange denials was troublesome. This is on the grounds that it is trying to decide administration imperatives. Duties force limitations on the progression of merchandise, though guidelines force limitations on the progression of administrations, and a specific degree of guideline is normally satisfactory to accomplish administrative targets. These hindrances have been tackled to some degree through advancements in financial way of thinking and information assortment on limits. Scientists can measure the impact of exchange limitations on the monetary execution, cost, cost, or potentially cost edges of administration providers by utilizing an exchange limitation file (McGuire, 2000).[14]

These impacts can be utilized to appraise the economy-wide and worldwide advantages of taking out help restrictions utilizing a calculable general harmony model. Dee and Hanslow (2000) assessed the advantages of administration progression utilizing a few of these factors.

Conclusion

The monetary demonstrating discoveries shed light on the need of changing or disposing of administration related limitations. As indicated by the World Bank, the overall advantages of changing administrations are like those of changing farming and industry consolidated. Internationally, the following ten years is supposed to see an absolute ascent in genuine pay for creating economies of US$ 130 billion. The main advantages will accumulate to economies that are generally compelled. While agricultural nations' admittance to worldwide administrations markets is basic, changing administrations on their own will bring about a lot bigger genuine pay gains than changing administrations related to different areas. Worldwide rivalry opens specialist co-ops to the related requirements and amazing open doors, convincing them to assign scant assets all the more effectively to the most beneficial financial improvement reasons. Various benefits exist for changing autonomously, and they are not restricted to the help business. Not in the least do the broadcast communications, monetary, and transportation areas supply extreme buyer administrations, they additionally give significant contributions to the production of different labour and products. Because of this relationship between the help business and different areas, critical benefits emerge outside the assistance area, which straightforwardly add to an economy's exchange and financial achievement. The impacts of exchange limitations on the arrangement of administrations are intricate, and ongoing financial displaying has given knowledge into the potential pay gains; in any case, extra exploration is fundamental. With regards to administrations exchange, there are a heap of expansive and particular limitations, and it is oftentimes difficult to catch every one of the repercussions of these requirements on help valuing and costs. Moreover, it is expected to keep creating general balance models to consolidate progressively immense information on the administrations exchange and precisely gauge future cost and cost outcomes. Regardless of whether monetary progression is useful, it raises concerns in regards to the ideal speed and sequencing of change. While numerous financial specialists accept that more quick progression is best, the truth of the matter is that fast advancement might bring about transient primary change and, thus, political ramifications. This article contends that it is essential to execute a far-reaching bundle of approaches, including some kind of friendly wellbeing net, to support the change cycle. Also, the appropriate environment should be made to help progression. To guarantee the steadiness of unfamiliar specialist organizations and to drive foundation venture, a sufficient administrative structure in the help area is fundamental, which many non-industrial nations need.

Bibliography

Benjamin, N. and X. Diao (1998), “Liberalizing Services Trade in APEC: A General Equilibrium Analysis with Imperfect Competition”, The Economic Implications of Liberalising APEC Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington DC.
Brown, D., A. Deardorff and R. Stern (1996), “Modelling Multilateral Liberalization in Services”, Asia-Pacific Economic Review, vol. 2, pp. 21-34.
Chadha, R. (2001), “GATS and the Developing Countries: A Case Study of India”, in Stern.
Robert M. (ed.), Services in the International Economy: Measurement and Modelling, “Sectoral and Country Studies and Issues in the WTO Services Negotiations”, University of Michigan Press.
Chadha, R., D. Brown, “A. Deardorff and A. Stern (2000), Computational Analysis of the Impact on India of the Uruguay Round and the Forthcoming WTO Trade Negotiations”, Discussion Paper No. 459, School of Public Policy, University of Michigan.
Claessens, S. and Glaessner, T. (1998), “Internationalization of Financial Services in Asia”, World Bank, Washington DC.
Dee, P. and K. Hanslow (2000), “Multilateral Liberalisation of Services Trade”, Productivity Commission Staff Research Paper, Ausinfo, Canberra http://www.pc.gov.au/research/ staffres/multilatlib/index.html (accessed 15 October 2001).
Dee, P., A. Hardin and L. Holmes (2000), “Issues in the Application of CGE Models to Services Trade Liberalization”, in Findlay, C. and Warren, T.
Dollar, D. and A. Kraay (2001), “Trade, Growth and Poverty”, World Bank Draft Working Paper, No. 2615, Washington DC.

Drabek, Z. and S. Laird (2001), “Can Trade Policy Help Mobilize Financial Resources for Economic Development”?, Research Paper No. 01/16, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.